Sivashakthi Kanagalingam1, Prem S Subramanian2,3,4. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1675 Aurora Court, Mailstop F-731, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. prem.subramanian@ucdenver.edu. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. prem.subramanian@ucdenver.edu. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. prem.subramanian@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review presents a critical appraisal of current therapeutic strategies for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). We present the reader with the most recent evidence to support medical and surgical interventions in patients with IIH and provide recommendations about treatment initiation and escalation. We also indicate areas where knowledge gaps exist regarding therapeutic efficacy and superiority of one intervention over another. RECENT FINDINGS: A double-masked, randomized prospective study of medical management of patients with mild IIH (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial-IIHTT) has established that acetazolamide therapy has additional efficacy when compared to weight loss alone. Furthermore, management of IIH-related headache, even in patients with papilledema, may require treatment other than ICP lowering for patients to experience symptomatic relief. Finally, a number of uncontrolled interventional studies have shown transverse sinus stenting to be a potentially effective treatment for medically refractory IIH. Medical therapy with acetazolamide should be considered in addition to structured weight loss in patients with mild IIH. Surgical treatment for patients with vision-threatening disease IIH can be performed by either optic nerve sheath fenestration or cerebrospinal fluid diversion, with venous sinus stenting emerging as an alternate therapy. Headache relief from ICP lowering therapy is variable and often not sustained.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review presents a critical appraisal of current therapeutic strategies for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). We present the reader with the most recent evidence to support medical and surgical interventions in patients with IIH and provide recommendations about treatment initiation and escalation. We also indicate areas where knowledge gaps exist regarding therapeutic efficacy and superiority of one intervention over another. RECENT FINDINGS: A double-masked, randomized prospective study of medical management of patients with mild IIH (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial-IIHTT) has established that acetazolamide therapy has additional efficacy when compared to weight loss alone. Furthermore, management of IIH-related headache, even in patients with papilledema, may require treatment other than ICP lowering for patients to experience symptomatic relief. Finally, a number of uncontrolled interventional studies have shown transverse sinus stenting to be a potentially effective treatment for medically refractory IIH. Medical therapy with acetazolamide should be considered in addition to structured weight loss in patients with mild IIH. Surgical treatment for patients with vision-threatening disease IIH can be performed by either optic nerve sheath fenestration or cerebrospinal fluid diversion, with venous sinus stenting emerging as an alternate therapy. Headache relief from ICP lowering therapy is variable and often not sustained.
Authors: Michael Wall; Michael P McDermott; Karl D Kieburtz; James J Corbett; Steven E Feldon; Deborah I Friedman; David M Katz; John L Keltner; Eleanor B Schron; Mark J Kupersmith Journal: JAMA Date: 2014 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laura C Huang; Timothy W Winter; Angela M Herro; Potyra R Rosa; Joyce C Schiffman; Joshua Pasol; Ryan S Trombly; Mike Tawfik; Byron L Lam Journal: J Neuroophthalmol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Rachel K Sobel; Nasreen A Syed; Keith D Carter; Richard C Allen Journal: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.746