Literature DB >> 29808367

[How do residents in urology evaluate their daily routine at work-a survey analysis].

U Necknig1, R Borowitz2, M Wöhr3, H Leyh1, D Weckermann4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The changing conditions in German hospitals is causing a shortage of young people. In order to identify starting point for improvements, the Bavarian association of urologists in collaboration with the German Society of Residents in Urology (GeSRU) conducted an online survey among residents in urology in summer of 2017.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardised survey composed of 38 questions was distributed to participants through a mailing list of the GeSRU. Most questions were closed-ended; however, some did allow participants to respond by means of an open-ended answer.
RESULTS: A total of 218 participants provided a total of 11,764 responses: 58% were female and 42% were male. Over 70% were aged between 31 and 35 years. In all, 29% of participants responded negatively to the question asking whether they feel like their medical studies at university prepared them well for the daily routine in their workplace. Participants particularly demanded a higher degree of practical experience during their studies, as well as more teaching of soft skills. In relation to choosing their specialisation, participants considered the intern year and their clinical traineeships as crucial factors. Participants did express appreciation of their field of specialization in relation to the broad range of available treatments, the opportunity of further specialising, the clientele of patients, the opportunity of working in a small team, innovations, and the high possibilities of opening their own medical practice. On a personal level, participants specifically wished for a more structured plan relating to their further internship, involving regular meetings. They also expressed the wish for more personalised career plans, more flexible work hours, and improved advanced training, both internally and externally.
CONCLUSIONS: With the aim of making urology even more attractive, participants' wishes and suggestions should be taken into consideration. These, in general, involve a more structured training plan, better working conditions with part-time programmes, and improved surrounding conditions at the workplace, in particular for families.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced training; Specialist medical training; Studies; Surrounding conditions; Urology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29808367     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0674-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  7 in total

1.  [Work and training conditions of young German physicians in internal medicine. Results of a nationwide survey by young internists from the German Society of Internal Medicine and the German Professional Association of Internists].

Authors:  Matthias Raspe; Alexis Müller-Marbach; Matthias Schneider; Timo Siepmann; Kevin Schulte
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  [Generation Y : recruitment, retention and development].

Authors:  C E Schmidt; J Möller; K Schmidt; M U Gerbershagen; F Wappler; V Limmroth; S A Padosch; M Bauer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Distress and job satisfaction among hospital physicians in internal medicine].

Authors:  J Bauer; D A Groneberg
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  [The Educational Situation of Young Chest Physicians: Reasons for Choosing Pneumology as Specialization and Assessment of Carreer-Relevant Aspects by Gender and Occupational Situation].

Authors:  Lucia Christians; Regina Prenzel
Journal:  Pneumologie       Date:  2017-08-07

5.  [Work and training conditions of residents in urology in Germany : Results of a 2015 nationwide survey by the German Society of Residents in Urology].

Authors:  H Arnold; C P Meyer; J Salem; M Raspe; J P Struck; H Borgmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Confidence with and Barriers to Serious Illness Communication: A National Survey of Hospitalists.

Authors:  Leah B Rosenberg; Jeff Greenwald; Bartho Caponi; Ami Doshi; Howard Epstein; Jeff Frank; Elizabeth Lindenberger; Nick Marzano; Lynnea M Mills; Rab Razzak; James Risser; Wendy G Anderson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Psychosocial stress at work and perceived quality of care among clinicians in surgery.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Kirstin Grosse Frie; Karl Blum; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Urology training in Germany: international comparison of educational concepts and satisfaction].

Authors:  A Cebulla; C Bolenz; D M Carrion; L Bellut
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Attending physicians in urology working at university centers or non-university centers-what are the differences? : Results of a web-based cross-sectional study at German hospitals].

Authors:  M May; I Wolff; J Bründl; M C Kriegmair; D Marghawal; C Wülfing; M Burger; U Necknig; C Schäfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.