Literature DB >> 29808266

Low Tunneling Decay of Iodine-Terminated Alkane Single-Molecule Junctions.

Lin-Lu Peng1, Bing Huang1, Qi Zou2, Ze-Wen Hong1, Ju-Fang Zheng1, Yong Shao1, Zhen-Jiang Niu1, Xiao-Shun Zhou3, Hu-Jun Xie4, Wenbo Chen5.   

Abstract

One key issue for the development of molecular electronic devices is to understand the electron transport of single-molecule junctions. In this work, we explore the electron transport of iodine-terminated alkane single molecular junctions using the scanning tunneling microscope-based break junction approach. The result shows that the conductance decreases exponentially with the increase of molecular length with a decay constant βN = 0.5 per -CH2 (or 4 nm-1). Importantly, the tunneling decay of those molecular junctions is much lower than that of alkane molecules with thiol, amine, and carboxylic acid as the anchoring groups and even comparable to that of the conjugated oligophenyl molecules. The low tunneling decay is attributed to the small barrier height between iodine-terminated alkane molecule and Au, which is well supported by DFT calculations. The work suggests that the tunneling decay can be effectively tuned by the anchoring group, which may guide the manufacturing of molecular wires.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alkyl-based molecules; Barrier height; Electron transport; Iodine; Single molecular junction

Year:  2018        PMID: 29808266      PMCID: PMC5972139          DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2528-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett        ISSN: 1556-276X            Impact factor:   4.703


Background

Understanding the electron transport of single-molecule junctions is crucial for the development of molecular electronic devices [1-16]. The non-resonant tunneling model has often been used to describe the electron transport process through small molecule, where contact conductance, molecular length, and the tunneling decay constant are the main parameters [17, 18]. In most molecular systems, decay constant is highly related to the electronic properties of organic backbone. For example, the conjugated molecular systems have low tunneling decay, unlike non-conjugated ones [17, 19]. Since the tunneling decay is decided by the barrier height between the Fermi level of electrode and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) or highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of molecular junctions [17, 20], it is possible to tune the molecular energy level towards the Fermi level to achieve the low decay [21-24]. In single-molecule junctions, the anchoring group plays an important role in the control of electronic coupling between the organic backbones with the electrodes [21, 23–25]. A series of conductance measurements for the alkane-based molecules have showed a significant effect of different anchoring groups on the binding geometry, junction formation probabilities, contact conductance, and even conductance channel (through LUMO or HOMO) of molecular junctions [21-25]. Since the anchoring group can regulate the frontier orbitals in the molecular junction, the tunneling decay of the molecule may also be tuned by the anchoring group [24]. However, limited study has been focused on this area. Herein, we report the electron transport of alkane molecules terminated with iodine group by using scanning tunneling microscopy break junction (STM-BJ) (Fig. 1) [26, 27]. The single molecular conductance measurements show that the conductance decreases exponentially with the increase of molecular lengths and the decay constant of alkane molecules with iodine group is much lower than that of the analogues with other anchoring groups. The different tunneling decay constants for alkane molecules with varied anchoring groups are explained by barrier height between molecule and electrode.
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of scanning tunneling microscopy break junction (STM-BJ) and molecular structures. a Schematic of the STM-BJ with molecular junction. b Molecular structures of alkane iodine molecules

Schematic diagram of scanning tunneling microscopy break junction (STM-BJ) and molecular structures. a Schematic of the STM-BJ with molecular junction. b Molecular structures of alkane iodine molecules

Methods

1,4-Butanediiodo, 1,5-pentanediiodo, and 1,6-hexanediiodo were purchased from Alfa Aesar. All solutions were prepared with ethanol. Au(111) was used as the substrate, while mechanically cut Au tips were used as the tips. Before each experiment, the Au(111) was electrochemically polished and carefully annealed in a butane flame and then dried with nitrogen. The Au(111) substrate was immersed into a freshly prepared ethanol solution containing 0.1 mM target molecules for 10 min. The conductance measurement was carried out on the modified Nanoscope IIIa STM (Veeco, USA.) by using the STM-BJ method at room temperature [28-30], which simply measured the conductance of single-molecule junctions formed by repeatedly moving the tip into and out of the substrate at a constant speed. During the process, the molecules could anchor between the two metal electrodes and form single molecular junctions. Thousands of such curves were collected for statistical analysis. All the experiments were performed with a fix bias voltage of 100 mV. Since molecules with iodine as the anchoring group are a photosensitive material, the experiment was carried out under shading.

Results and Discussion

Conductance Measurement of Iodine-Terminated Alkane Single Molecular Junctions

The conductance measurements were first carried out on Au(111) with monolayer of 1,4-butanediiodo by STM-BJ. Figure 2a gives out the typical conductance traces exhibiting the stepwise feature. Conductance traces show plateau at 1 G0, indicating the formation of stable Au atomic contact. Plateau at a conductance value of 10−3.6 G0 (19.47 ns) is also found besides the 1 G0, owing to the formation of molecular junction. A conductance histogram could also be obtained by treating with logarithm and binning of conductance value from more than 3000 conductance traces, and then, the intensity of conductance histogram was normalized by the number of traces used and shows a conductance peak at 10−3.6 G0 (19.44 ns) (Fig. 2b). Those show that the iodine group can serve as an effective anchoring group forming molecular junction. However, this value is smaller than the single molecular conductance value of 1,4-butanediamine with amine as the anchoring group, which may stem from weak interaction between iodine and Au electrode [31].
Fig. 2

Single molecular conductance of Au–1,4-butanediiodo–Au junctions. a Typical conductance curves of Au–1,4-butanediiodo–Au junctions measured at a bias of 100 mV. b Log-scale conductance histogram of 1,4-butanediiodo junctions with Au contacts

Single molecular conductance of Au1,4-butanediiodoAu junctions. a Typical conductance curves of Au1,4-butanediiodoAu junctions measured at a bias of 100 mV. b Log-scale conductance histogram of 1,4-butanediiodo junctions with Au contacts In comparison with 1,4-diiodobutane, pronounced peaks at 10−3.8 G0 (12.28 ns) and 10−4.0 G0 (7.75 ns) are found for 1,5-pentanediiodo and 1,6-hexanediiodo, respectively (Fig. 3). The conductance values decrease with the increasing of molecule length. Meanwhile, the conductance values of 1,5-pentanediiodo and 1,6-hexanediiodo are smaller than those of 1,5-pentanediamine and 1,6-hexanediamine, respectively [31], which may be caused by the different interaction in alkane-based molecular junctions between iodine and amine anchoring groups binding to Au electrodes [32].
Fig. 3

Single molecular conductance of 1,5-pentanediiodo and 1,6-hexanediiodo with Au electrode. Log-scale conductance histogram of single molecular junctions with a 1,5-pentanediiodo and b 1,6-hexanediiodo

Single molecular conductance of 1,5-pentanediiodo and 1,6-hexanediiodo with Au electrode. Log-scale conductance histogram of single molecular junctions with a 1,5-pentanediiodo and b 1,6-hexanediiodo The two-dimensional conductance histograms were also constructed for those molecular junctions (Additional file 1: Figure S1) and give out similar conductance values of one-dimensional histograms. Typically, the breaking off distance of molecular junctions increases with the increasing of molecular length. We also analyze the distance from the conductance value of 10−5.0 G0 to 10−0.3 G0 as shown in Fig. 4, and rupture distances of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 nm are found for 1,4-butanediiodo, 1,5-pentanediiodo, and 1,6-hexanediiodo, respectively. Here, the rupture distances are obtained from the maximum peak of the rupture distance histogram [33]. It was reported that there is a snap back distance of 0.5 nm for Au after the breaking of AuAu contact [34, 35]; thus, the absolute distances for those molecular junctions between electrodes could be 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 nm which are found for 1,4-butanediiodo, 1,5-pentanediiodo, and 1,6-hexanediiodo, respectively. Those distances are comparable to the length of molecules. Eder et al. reported that the adsorption of 1,3,5-tri (4-iodophenyl)-benzene monolayer onto Au(111) may cause partial dehalogenation [36]; however, a very larger conductance value for those AuC covalent contact molecular junctions can be found for molecules with four (around 10−1 G0) and six (bigger than 10−2 G0) –CH2– units [37]. Thus, we propose that the current investigated molecules contact to the Au through the Au–I contact.
Fig. 4

Breaking off distances for iodine-terminated alkanes. Breaking off distances of a 1,4-butanediiodo, b 1,5-pentanediiodo, and c 1,6-hexanediiodo obtained from conductance curves between 10−5.0 G0 and 10−0.3 G0

Breaking off distances for iodine-terminated alkanes. Breaking off distances of a 1,4-butanediiodo, b 1,5-pentanediiodo, and c 1,6-hexanediiodo obtained from conductance curves between 10−5.0 G0 and 10−0.3 G0

Tunneling Decay Constant of Iodine-Terminated Alkane Single Molecular Junctions

Under the current bias, those molecule conductance can be expressed as G = Gc exp(–βNN). Here, G is the conductance of the molecule and Gc is the contact conductance and is determined by the interaction between the anchoring group and the electrode. N is the methylene number in the molecule, and βN is the tunneling decay constant, which reflects the coupling efficiency of electron transport between the molecule and the electrode. As show in Fig. 5, we plot a natural logarithm scale of conductance against the number of methylene; tunneling decay constant βN of 0.5 per –CH2 is determined from the slope of linear fitting. This tunneling decay is very low in alkane-based molecules. For the alkane-based molecules, βN is usually found around 1.0 per –CH2 for thiol (SH) [23, 38], while around 0.9 and 0.8 per –CH2 are determined for amine (NH2) [23, 31] and carboxylic acid (COOH), respectively [39]. Thus, the tunneling decay with iodine shows the lowest value among those anchoring groups with a trend βN (thiol) > βN (amine) > βN (carboxylic acid) > βN (iodine), which may be due to the difference in the alignment of molecular energy levels to the Fermi level of Au electrode [23, 31]. The tunneling decay of 0.5 per –CH2 can also be converted to 4 nm−1, which is comparable to oligophenyls with 3.5–5 nm−1 [40, 41].
Fig. 5

Single-molecule conductance vs molecular length for iodine-terminated alkanes. Logarithmic plots of single-molecule conductance vs molecular length for iodine-terminated alkanes

Single-molecule conductance vs molecular length for iodine-terminated alkanes. Logarithmic plots of single-molecule conductance vs molecular length for iodine-terminated alkanes The βN for the metal-molecule-metal junctions can be simply described by the below equation [17, 20, 38],where m is the effective electron mass and is the reduced Planck’s constant. Φ represents the barrier height, which is decided by the energy gap between the Fermi level and the molecular energy levels in the junction. Obviously, the βN value is proportional to the square root of barrier height. Thus, we may propose that iodine-terminated alkane molecules have small Φ with the Au electrode.

Barrier Height of Single Molecular Junctions with Different Anchoring Groups

Taking the –(CH2)6– as the backbone, we performed the rough calculations (see computational detail in Additional file 1) to investigate the frontier molecular orbitals of complexes with four Au atoms at the both ends, including 1,6-hexanedithiol (C6DT), 1,6-hexanediamineb (C6DA), 1,6-hexanedicarboxylic acid (C6DC), and 1,6-hexanediiodo (C6DI). As shown in Table 1, the HOMO and LUMO are − 6.18 and − 1.99 eV, respectively, for C6DT, while HOMO (6.02 eV) and LUMO (− 1.85 eV) are found for C6DA. Meanwhile, HOMO and LUMO energy levels are calculated for C6DC (-6.33 and -2.58 eV) and C6DI (-6.22 and -2.61 eV).
Table 1

Energy levels of the frontier orbitals of molecules contacting with four Au atoms computed by DFT method

Au4-C6DT-Au4 (eV)Au4-C6DA-Au4 (eV)Au4-C6DC-Au4 (eV)Au4-C6DI-Au4 (eV)
ELUMO− 1.99− 1.85− 2.58− 2.61
EHOMO− 6.18− 6.02− 6.33− 6.22
ELUMO-EAu2.212.351.621.59
EAu-EHOMO1.981.822.132.02
Energy levels of the frontier orbitals of molecules contacting with four Au atoms computed by DFT method For the Fermi level of Au electrode, we need to consider the influence of the adsorption of molecules. In the vacuum condition, clean Au gives out work function of 5.1 eV [42]; meanwhile, this value can be obviously changed by the adsorption of molecules. Kim et al. [43] and Yuan et al. [44] have found that the work function of Au is around 4.2 eV (4.0–4.4 eV) upon the adsorbed self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) measured by the ultraviolet photoelectron spectrometer (UPS). Low et al. also investigated the electron transport of thiophene-based molecules of TOTOT (LUMO − 3.3 eV, HOMO − 5.2 eV) and TTOpTT (LUMO − 3.6 eV, HOMO − 5.1 eV) with Au as the electrode (T, O, and Op denote thiophene, thiophene-1,1-dioxide, and oxidized thienopyrrolodione, respectively) [45]. The results show that the Fermi level of Au is in the middle of LUMO and HOMO. Thus, we can infer the Fermi level of Au can be around the average energy level of LUMO and HOMO, which are − 4.25 and − 4.35 eV established from TOTOT and TTOPTT, respectively. The Fermi level of Au − 4.25 and − 4.35 eV are similar to that measured by UPS with − 4.2 eV [43]. According to the above, we will use the − 4.2 eV as the Fermi level of Au electrode with the adsorption of molecule. Assuming the Fermi level of − 4.2 eV for Au with SAM, C6DT and C6DA are the HOMO-dominated electron transport, while LUMO-dominated electron transport is proposed for the C6DC and C6DI. Thus, the barrier height Φ can be established as 1.98 eV (C6DT), 1.82 eV (C6DA), 1.62 eV (C6DC), and 1.59 eV (C6DI) (Table 1). The trend for the barrier height between the molecule and Au is ΦC6DT (thiol) > ΦC6DA (amine) > ΦC6DC (carboxylic acid) > ΦC6DI (iodine), which is consistent with the trend of the tunneling decay (β). Thus, the unusual low tunneling decay can be contributed to the small barrier height between iodine-terminated alkane molecules and Au.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have measured the conductance of alkane-based molecules with iodine group contacting to Au electrodes by STM-BJ at room temperature. A tunneling decay βN of 0.5 per –CH2 was found for those molecules with Au electrodes, which is much lower than that of alkane-based molecules with other anchoring groups. This can be caused by the small barrier height between the iodine-terminated alkane molecule and Au. The current work shows the important role of the anchoring group in electrical characteristics of single molecular junctions, which can tune the tunneling decay of molecular junction and guide the manufacturing molecular wire. Two-dimensional conductance histograms of molecular junctions and computational details. (DOCX 173 kb)
  35 in total

1.  Do molecular conductances correlate with electrochemical rate constants? Experimental insights.

Authors:  Xiao-Shun Zhou; Ling Liu; Philippe Fortgang; Anne-Sophie Lefevre; Anna Serra-Muns; Noureddine Raouafi; Christian Amatore; Bing-Wei Mao; Emmanuel Maisonhaute; Bernd Schöllhorn
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Rectification and stability of a single molecular diode with controlled orientation.

Authors:  Ismael Díez-Pérez; Joshua Hihath; Youngu Lee; Luping Yu; Lyudmyla Adamska; Mortko A Kozhushner; Ivan I Oleynik; Nongjian Tao
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2009-10-11       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  Multichannel conductance of folded single-molecule wires aided by through-space conjugation.

Authors:  Long Chen; Ya-Hao Wang; Bairong He; Han Nie; Rongrong Hu; Fei Huang; Anjun Qin; Xiao-Shun Zhou; Zujin Zhao; Ben Zhong Tang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Signatures of quantum interference effects on charge transport through a single benzene ring.

Authors:  Carlos R Arroyo; Simge Tarkuc; Riccardo Frisenda; Johannes S Seldenthuis; Charlotte H M Woerde; Rienk Eelkema; Ferdinand C Grozema; Herre S J van der Zant
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Thermally Activated Tunneling Transition in a Photoswitchable Single-Molecule Electrical Junction.

Authors:  Na Xin; Chuancheng Jia; Jinying Wang; Shuopei Wang; Mingliang Li; Yao Gong; Guangyu Zhang; Daoben Zhu; Xuefeng Guo
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Non-exponential Length Dependence of Conductance in Iodide-Terminated Oligothiophene Single-Molecule Tunneling Junctions.

Authors:  Limin Xiang; Thomas Hines; Julio L Palma; Xuefeng Lu; Vladimiro Mujica; Mark A Ratner; Gang Zhou; Nongjian Tao
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Correlations between molecular structure and single-junction conductance: a case study with oligo(phenylene-ethynylene)-type wires.

Authors:  Veerabhadrarao Kaliginedi; Pavel Moreno-García; Hennie Valkenier; Wenjing Hong; Víctor M García-Suárez; Petra Buiter; Jelmer L H Otten; Jan C Hummelen; Colin J Lambert; Thomas Wandlowski
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Contact chemistry and single-molecule conductance: a comparison of phosphines, methyl sulfides, and amines.

Authors:  Young S Park; Adam C Whalley; Maria Kamenetska; Michael L Steigerwald; Mark S Hybertsen; Colin Nuckolls; Latha Venkataraman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Tuning the polarity of charge carriers using electron deficient thiophenes.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Low; Brian Capozzi; Jing Cui; Sujun Wei; Latha Venkataraman; Luis M Campos
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Chemical control over the energy-level alignment in a two-terminal junction.

Authors:  Li Yuan; Carlos Franco; Núria Crivillers; Marta Mas-Torrent; Liang Cao; C S Suchand Sangeeth; Concepció Rovira; Jaume Veciana; Christian A Nijhuis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Electrochemically controlled rectification in symmetric single-molecule junctions.

Authors:  Zixiao Wang; Julio L Palma; Hui Wang; Junzhi Liu; Gang Zhou; M R Ajayakumar; Xinliang Feng; Wei Wang; Jens Ulstrup; Alexei A Kornyshev; Yueqi Li; Nongjian Tao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 2.  Metal Centers as Nucleophiles: Oxymoron of Halogen Bond-Involving Crystal Engineering.

Authors:  Daniil M Ivanov; Nadezhda A Bokach; Vadim Yu Kukushkin; Antonio Frontera
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.020

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.