Literature DB >> 29807853

Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory.

Daniela J Palombo1, Signy Sheldon2, Brian Levine3.   

Abstract

Although humans have a remarkable capacity to recall a wealth of detail from the past, there are marked interindividual differences in the quantity and quality of our mnemonic experiences. Such differences in autobiographical memory may appear self-evident, yet there has been little research on this topic. In this review, we synthesize an emerging body of research regarding individual differences in autobiographical memory. We focus on two syndromes that fall at the extremes of the 'remembering' dimension: highly superior autobiographical memory (HSAM) and severely deficient autobiographical memory (SDAM). We also discuss findings from research on less extreme individual differences in autobiographical memory. This avenue of research is pivotal for a full description of the behavioral and neural substrates of autobiographical memory.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic memory; highly superior autobiographical memory; severely deficient autobiographical memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29807853     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  21 in total

1.  A Posterior-Anterior Distinction between Scene Perception and Scene Construction in Human Medial Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Edward H Silson; Adrian W Gilmore; Sarah E Kalinowski; Adam Steel; Alexis Kidder; Alex Martin; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The Autobiographical Recollection Test (ART): A Measure of Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory.

Authors:  Dorthe Berntsen; Rick H Hoyle; David C Rubin
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-07-26

3.  On the relationship between trait autobiographical episodic memory and spatial navigation.

Authors:  Carina L Fan; Hervé Abdi; Brian Levine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-13

4.  Machine learning to detect invalid text responses: Validation and comparison to existing detection methods.

Authors:  Ryan C Yeung; Myra A Fernandes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  Hippocampus and temporal pole functional connectivity is associated with age and individual differences in autobiographical memory.

Authors:  Roni Setton; Laetitia Mwilambwe-Tshilobo; Signy Sheldon; Gary R Turner; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Conduction velocity along a key white matter tract is associated with autobiographical memory recall ability.

Authors:  Ian A Clark; Siawoosh Mohammadi; Martina F Callaghan; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  The relationship between episodic detail generation and anterotemporal, posteromedial, and hippocampal white matter tracts.

Authors:  Molly Memel; Aubrey A Wank; Lee Ryan; Matthew D Grilli
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Beyond episodic remembering: elaborative retrieval of lifetime periods in young and older adults.

Authors:  Mónica C Acevedo-Molina; Stephanie Matijevic; Matthew D Grilli
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2019-10-31

9.  Troubled past: A critical psychometric assessment of the self-report Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM).

Authors:  Roni Setton; Amber W Lockrow; Gary R Turner; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-22

10.  Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia.

Authors:  Fraser Milton; Jon Fulford; Carla Dance; James Gaddum; Brittany Heuerman-Williamson; Kealan Jones; Kathryn F Knight; Matthew MacKisack; Crawford Winlove; Adam Zeman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.