Literature DB >> 29807449

An Institutional Program to Increase Compliance with Clinicaltrials.gov Requirements.

Issis Kelly-Pumarol1, Joseph E Andrews1.   

Abstract

Recent National Institutes of Health policy changes have expanded the number of research studies that must be registered in clinicaltrials.gov beyond the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has also adopted a policy that requires registration of research in a public database. The goal was to increase the transparency of research by reporting the original endpoints of a study, and to discern whether primary endpoints were excluded in subsequent publications. Efforts to increase openness and accountability in clinical trials are likely to strengthen public trust. However, first investigators and study staff must be educated about the requirements, and staff must be prepared to offer support to researchers in navigating the clinicaltrials.gov system. For academic institutions, maintaining compliance requires continuous oversight so that problems can be identified centrally and addressed with investigators. At Wake Forest University Health Sciences, because researchers often did not realize they were out of compliance, we implemented a program to assist them and provide oversight. We introduced standard operating procedures, provided education and assistance to investigators, and engaged leadership about consequences of compliance, resulting in increased budget support for a full-time employee in this role. As a result of these changes, compliance increased from 22% to 92% over 4 months. These approaches may help other institutions become compliant with registration requirements more quickly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinicaltrials.gov; data transparency; disclosures; outcomes reporting; registry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29807449      PMCID: PMC6027609          DOI: 10.1177/2168479018778284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  6 in total

1.  Clinicaltrials.gov: Is the Glass Half Full?

Authors:  Victor Guharoy
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2014-11

2.  Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson; Michael S Lauer; Francis S Collins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Compliance with results reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Monique L Anderson; Karen Chiswell; Eric D Peterson; Asba Tasneem; James Topping; Robert M Califf
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Systematic drug repositioning through mining adverse event data in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Authors:  Eric Wen Su; Todd M Sanger
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals.

Authors:  Benjamin Howard; Jared T Scott; Mark Blubaugh; Brie Roepke; Caleb Scheckel; Matt Vassar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.