Literature DB >> 29807021

The clinical utility of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies and the challenges of their determination.

Eckart Mummert1, Marvin J Fritzler2, Christopher Sjöwall3, Chelsea Bentow1, Michael Mahler4.   

Abstract

Autoantibodies against double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) were first described >60 years ago and although they are still one of the most clinically relevant autoantibodies, test results may be more challenging to interpret compared to other autoantibody tests. They are a serological hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are included in both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria for SLE. Furthermore, anti-dsDNA antibodies (a-dsDNA) have been shown to associate with SLE disease activity and coincide with renal involvement. Given their importance and long history, one might assume that immunological tests for a-dsDNA are standardized and give comparable results. However, even though there has been an international reference standard serum (the WHO Wo/80), different methods for the detection of a-dsDNA and tests from different manufacturers give different results for the same samples. This disparity is due to the diversity of possible antibodies generated to this biochemically complex antigen, which may have different clinical associations. The goal of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the clinical associations with a-dsDNA, highlight challenges in a-dsDNA testing, and elucidate the reasons for discrepant results between methods or manufacturers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoantibodies; SLE; dsDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29807021     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  16 in total

1.  Longitudinal anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) seroconversion in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study of Swedish cases with recent-onset disease.

Authors:  M Frodlund; J Wetterö; C Dahle; Ö Dahlström; T Skogh; J Rönnelid; C Sjöwall
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The interaction of anti-DNA antibodies with DNA antigen: Evidence for hysteresis for high avidity binding.

Authors:  David S Pisetsky; Robert Shaffer; Dustin D Armstrong; Diane M Spencer
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Immunoglobulin A Glycosylation and Its Role in Disease.

Authors:  Alyssa L Hansen; Colin Reily; Jan Novak; Matthew B Renfrow
Journal:  Exp Suppl       Date:  2021

4.  B cell-intrinsic TLR9 expression is protective in murine lupus.

Authors:  Jeremy S Tilstra; Shinu John; Rachael A Gordon; Claire Leibler; Michael Kashgarian; Sheldon Bastacky; Kevin M Nickerson; Mark J Shlomchik
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The Utilization of Autoantibodies in Approaches to Precision Health.

Authors:  Marvin J Fritzler; Laura Martinez-Prat; May Y Choi; Michael Mahler
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Comparison of Three Immunoassays for the Detection of Myositis Specific Antibodies.

Authors:  Michael Mahler; Zoe Betteridge; Chelsea Bentow; Michaelin Richards; Andrea Seaman; Hector Chinoy; Neil McHugh
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  The perspective on standardisation and harmonisation: the viewpoint of the EASI president.

Authors:  Jan Damoiseaux
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2020-02-06

8.  Gut microbiota promote the inflammatory response in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Yiyangzi Ma; Xiaoxue Xu; Mengtao Li; Jun Cai; Qiang Wei; Haitao Niu
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.354

9.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Autoantibodies as a Paradigm Shift in Autoimmune Serology.

Authors:  Adrian Y S Lee; Tim Chataway; Alex D Colella; Tom P Gordon; Jing J Wang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Different indirect immunofluorescence ANA substrate performance in a diagnostic setting of patients with SLE and related disorders: retrospective review and analysis.

Authors:  May Y Choi; Jing Cui; Karen Costenbader; David Rydzewski; Lisa Bernhard; Peter Schur
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.