| Literature DB >> 29806583 |
Amelia R DeFosset1, Allison Kwan2, Daniel Rizik-Baer2, Luis Gutierrez3, Lauren N Gase4, Tony Kuo2,5,6.
Abstract
Increasing access to fresh produce in small retail venues could improve the diet of people in underserved communities. However, small retailers face barriers to stocking fresh produce. In 2014, an innovative distribution program, Community Markets Purchasing Real and Affordable Foods (COMPRA), was launched in Los Angeles with the aim of making it more convenient and profitable for small retailers to stock fresh produce. Our case study describes the key processes and lessons learned in the first 2 years of implementing COMPRA. Considerable investments in staff capacity and infrastructure were needed to launch COMPRA. Early successes included significant week-to-week increases in the volume of produce distributed. Leveraging partnerships, maintaining a flexible operational and funding structure, and broadly addressing store owners' needs contributed to initial gains. We describe key challenges and next steps to scaling the program. Lessons learned from implementing COMPRA could inform other jurisdictions considering supply-side approaches to increase access to healthy food.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29806583 PMCID: PMC5985911 DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.170291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Chronic Dis ISSN: 1545-1151 Impact factor: 2.830
FigureKey program activities, potential outcomes, and effects of the COMPRA healthy food distribution program.
Key Activities and Timeline for Establishing the COMPRA Healthy Food Distribution Program in Los Angeles, California, 2014–2016
| Project Phase | Key Activities | Approximate Number of Months Required |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Forming the operating team, designing the concept, and planning for launch | • Received unrestricted seed funding to address food access issues | 6 |
| • Identified interest among stakeholder network in developing a program to address supply chain challenges related to healthy food | ||
| • Secured LURN as partner to co-lead and prototype the program | ||
| • Conducted formative research (eg, focus groups) to capture the perspective of stakeholders, including potential program participants | ||
| • Defined the program scope: focused on establishing a healthy food distribution program | ||
| • Conducted subsequent research to understand structure of healthy distribution programs in other jurisdictions and issues related to sourcing fresh produce in Los Angeles | ||
|
| ||
| 2. Program pilot launch | • Finalized leadership structure: LAFPC, LURN, and APIFM | 6–8 |
| • Secured sufficient resources to begin operations: one delivery van; basic sales-tracking measures; temporary cold storage; staff time to conduct outreach to small retailers, process orders, deliver produce, and provide technical assistance to member stores once they enrolled in the program | ||
| • Recruited sample of 7 members, including several “member champions,” through Healthy Neighborhood Market Network | ||
| • Identified produce supplier willing to accommodate small volume orders and provide products at cost | ||
| • Began accepting and delivering orders to stores | ||
|
| ||
| 3. Refining operations and scaling up | • Secured needed resources to sustain and grow operations: 1 additional delivery van, paid delivery drivers, permanent cold storage facilities | ≥12 |
| • Secured local and national funding that supported program operations from US Department of Agriculture, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (via the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health), The Ahmanson Foundation, and a Community Development Block Grant from City of Los Angeles | ||
| • Outreached to and recruited additional member stores in Promise Zone areas of Los Angeles | ||
Abbreviations: APIFM, Asian Pacific Islander Forward Movement; COMPRA, Community Markets Purchasing Real and Affordable Foods; LAFPC, Los Angeles Food Policy Council; LURN, Leadership for Urban Renewal Network.
Quarterly Changes in Membership and Sales Volume During COMPRA Foods Evaluation Period, Los Angeles, California, 2015–2016a
| Measure | Quarter | Week-to-Week Change: Parameter Estimate (95% Confidence Interval) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Average weekly sales volume, lb (SD) | 151.92 (81.78) | 269.87 (67.90) | 280.87 (71.61) | 400.25 (111.63) | 6.00 (4.50–7.50) |
| Average no. members per week (range) | 10.00 (8–12) | 10.38 (10–11) | 11.00 (10–12) | 13.85 (12–15) | 0.10 (0.08–0.12) |
Abbreviation: COMPRA, Community Markets Purchasing Real and Affordable Foods.
Adapted with permission of Springer from DeFosset et al (8).
Simple linear regression model.
Significant at α = 0.05.