| Literature DB >> 29805483 |
Ping Sun1,2, Lei Lu1,2, Jun Chen2, Xiao Dan Liu1,2, Qing Zhang1,2, Xu Wang1,3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of AMP-activated protein kinase α subunit (AMPKα), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and Fcγ receptor (FcγR) in diabetic nephropathy and drug intervention effects. Sixty Sprague Dawley male rats were randomly divided into the control (n=30) and observation (n=30) groups. The model of type 2 diabetic nephropathy was established by high-fat and high-glucose diet and streptozotocin injection. The rats in the observation group were treated with baicalein and the rats in control group did not receive any drug intervention. The pathological changes of kidneys were observed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The expression of AMPKα mRNA in renal tissue was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The levels of hs-CRP and FcγR were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at 1, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after drug intervention and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and the 24 h urinary micro-albumin (U-ALB) levels were compared at 1, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after intervention. After 8 weeks of drug intervention, the pathological changes of kidneys in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p<0.05), while the relative expression levels of AMPKα mRNA and protein in the control group were higher than those in the observation group (p<0.05). The levels of hs-CRP, BUN and 24 h U-ALB in the control group were significantly higher than those in the observation group at different time-points after drug intervention and the level of FcγR in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group (p<0.05). Baicalein may protect renal function by inhibiting the expression of AMPKα and inflammatory reaction, and can also decrease BUN and 24 h U-ALB levels and improve the pathological changes of the kidney.Entities:
Keywords: AMP-activated protein kinase α subunit; FcγR; baicalein; diabetic nephropathy; hypersensitive C-reactive protein
Year: 2018 PMID: 29805483 PMCID: PMC5952080 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
AMPKα and β-actin primer sequences.
| Item | Sequence |
|---|---|
| AMPKα | F: 5′-GTTCTACCTCGCCTCCAGTC-3′ |
| R: 5′-TGCTCCACCACCTCATCATC-3′ | |
| β-actin | F: 5′-ACTGGCATTGTGATGGACTC-3′ |
| R: 5′-AGGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAG-3′ |
F, forward; R, reverse.
Figure 1.H&E staining results. Renal pathological changes of rats in the (A) control and (B) observation groups (magnification, ×400). The degree of renal pathological change in the observation group is significantly relieved compared with that in the control group. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.
Comparison of AMPKα expression in rats between the two groups.
| Group | Relative expression level of AMPKα mRNA | Relative expression level of AMPKα protein |
|---|---|---|
| Observation | 0.493±0.074 | 0.978±0.124 |
| group | ||
| Control | 0.278±0.062 | 0.456±0.083 |
| group | ||
| t-test | 12.198 | 19.161 |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 |
AMPKα, AMP-activated protein kinase α.
Figure 2.Gel electrophoresis results of RT-PCR amplification of AMPKα mRNA in rats in both groups. M, DNA marker; 1–4, control group; 5–8, observation group; AMPKα, AMP-activated protein kinase α.
Figure 3.Results of AMPKα protein expression in both groups. 1–4, control group; 5–8, observation group. AMPKα, AMP-activated protein kinase α.
Comparison of hs-CRP level in rats between the two groups after drug intervention (mg/l).
| Group | Case | 1 week after intervention | 4 weeks after intervention | 6 weeks after intervention | 8 weeks after intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 7.52±2.73 | 5.75±2.26 | 3.47±1.35 | 1.83±0.56 |
| Control group | 30 | 12.36±3.42 | 13.43±3.63 | 14.22±3.15 | 15.45±3.53 |
| t-test | 6.058 | 9.837 | 17.181 | 20.872 | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
hs-CRP, hypersensitive C-reactive protein.
Comparison of FcγR level in rats between the two groups after drug intervention (ng/ml).
| Group | Case | 1 week after intervention | 4 weeks after intervention | 6 weeks after intervention | 8 weeks after intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 22.57±3.74 | 25.68±3.16 | 26.67±3.38 | 27.63±3.58 |
| Control group | 30 | 17.46±3.47 | 18.53±3.62 | 18.42±3.16 | 19.15±3.23 |
| t-test | 5.486 | 8.150 | 9.766 | 9.633 | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
FcγR, Fcγ receptor.
Comparison of BUN level in rats between the two groups after drug intervention (mmol/l).
| Group | Case | 1 week after intervention | 4 weeks after intervention | 6 weeks after intervention | 8 weeks after intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 9.08±2.53 | 8.23±2.16 | 6.87±1.75 | 4.43±1.35 |
| Control group | 30 | 18.35±2.46 | 18.73±2.13 | 19.82±2.14 | 24.45±2.43 |
| t-test | 14.388 | 18.958 | 25.658 | 39.446 | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
BUN, blood urea nitrogen.
Comparison of 24 h U-ALB level in rats between the two groups after drug intervention (mg).
| Group | Case | 1 week after intervention | 4 weeks after intervention | 6 weeks after intervention | 8 weeks after intervention |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 85.53±7.35 | 78.75±5.16 | 59.48±4.38 | 47.83±3.57 |
| Control group | 30 | 164.39±9.47 | 193.43±9.65 | 203.22±9.36 | 209.45±9.43 |
| t-test | 36.032 | 57.410 | 76.184 | 87.793 | |
| P-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
U-ALB, urinary micro-albumin.