Literature DB >> 2980544

Thermal effects of high-field (1.5 tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Clinical experience above a specific absorption rate of 0.4 W/kg.

F G Shellock1, D J Schaefer, W Grundfest, J V Crues.   

Abstract

Current safety guidelines recommend limiting the exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation used for clinical magnetic resonance imaging to a whole body average specific absorption rate (SAR) of 0.4 W/kg. Since it may be desirable to image with SARs that exceed this level during MRI of the spine, we evaluated the thermal responses associated with these procedures. Body and skin temperatures were determined in 25 patients immediately before and after MRI. Since the eye is particularly susceptible to thermal injury, corneal temperature was also measured. High-resolution thermography was performed on three subjects to evaluate the surface heating pattern and identify potential thermal 'hot spots'. A 1.5 tesla/64 MHz MRI system with quadrature transmission and reception was used iN this study. The whole body average specific absorption rate ranged from 0.5 to 1.3 W/kg. Ambient conditions were room temperature 20-24 degrees C and relative humidity between 40 and 50 per cent. There was a slight but statistically significant (p less than 0.01) increase in body temperature after MRI (36.5 +/- 0.4 to 36.7 +/- 0.4 degrees C). Temperatures of the hand (30.4 +/- 1.4 to 31.2 +/- 1.0 degrees C), positioning isocenter (32.1 +/- 0.6 to 32.9 +/- 0.5), and cornea (32.5 +/- 0.6 to 32.9 +/- 0.5 degrees C) also increased a statistically significant amount. Thermographic imaging revealed normal heating patterns with no surface 'hot spots'. We conclude that the temperature changes associated with MRI of the spine at the SARs we studied were well below known thresholds for adverse effects and do not appear to be harmful to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2980544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl        ISSN: 0365-5954


  3 in total

Review 1.  Sustainable low-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance in changing healthcare systems.

Authors:  Cathy Qin; Sanjana Murali; Elsa Lee; Vaishnavi Supramaniam; Derek J Hausenloy; Johnes Obungoloch; Joanna Brecher; Rongyu Lin; Hao Ding; Theophilus N Akudjedu; Udunna C Anazodo; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Orlando P Simonetti; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Thoralf Niendorf; Regina Mammen; Sola Adeleke
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.130

Review 2.  Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview.

Authors:  Domenico Formica; Sergio Silvestri
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  High-energy external defibrillation and transcutaneous pacing during MRI: feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Vladimir Shusterman; Denice Hodgson-Zingman; Daniel Thedens; Xiaodong Zhu; Stacy Hoffman; Jessica C Sieren; Gina M Morgan; Anthony Faranesh; Barry London
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.364

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.