Literature DB >> 29805309

Chemical and genetic inhibition of STAT3 sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib induced cell death.

Linna Xie1,2, Yanhua Zeng1, Zichan Dai3, Wensheng He2, Huozhao Ke2, Qiaofa Lin1, Yan Chen4, Jingjing Bu1, Dexin Lin1, Min Zheng1,3.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become the second leading cause of cancer related death, with an increasing death rate in recent years. For advanced HCC, sorafenib is the first-line FDA approved drug, with no more than 3 months' overall survival advantage. Recently, a novel strategy has been proposed to improve sorafenib efficacy through enhancing the ability of sorafenib to induce cell death. STAT3 plays a key role in cancer development and recurrence by promoting cell proliferation, survival and immune evasion through its well-established function as a transcription factor in cancer. Notably, STAT3 transcription activity, indicated by its phosphorylation on Y705 is heterogeneous in different liver cancer cell lines. And sorafenib attenuates STAT3 phosphorylation on Y705. However, the role of STAT3 in sorafenib induced cell death is still largely unknown. Here, we show that liver cancer cells also exhibit heterogeneous sensitivities to sorafenib induced cell death, which co-relates with the STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation levels and JAK1/2 expression levels in Hep3B, Huh7 and HepG2 cells. Furthermore, overexpression or knockdown of STAT3 could switch HCC cells between resistant and sensitive to sorafenib induced cell death, which could be partially due to its regulation on Mcl-1, an anti-apoptotic protein. Finally, both inhibitors of STAT3 SH2 domain (S3i-201) or STAT3 upstream kinases JAKs (JAK inhibitor I) could synergistically enhance sorafenib induced cell death. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that STAT3 is not only a downstream effector of sorafenib, but also a key regulator of cellular sensitivity to sorafenib induced cell death, which provide support for the notion to develop STAT3-targeting drugs to improve clinical efficacy of sorafenib in liver cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell death; HCC; STAT3; Sorafenib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29805309      PMCID: PMC5968850          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.22220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   6.580


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, often accompanied by chronic liver disease due to viral hepatitis, alcohol abuse or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis 1. Because liver cancer is an extraordinary heterogeneous malignant disease 2 and could be induced by multiple etiologies3, treatment of liver cancer is usually unsatisfied and the five-year survival rate is only reaching 26% 4. Until 2012, liver cancer has become the second leading cause of cancer related death 5. The first line FDA-approved targeted drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is sorafenib, which was originally developed as an inhibitor targeting on Raf kinase, a key regulator of cell proliferation 6. Pharmacological profile showed that sorafenib could also block multiple kinases including VEGFRs, PDGFRβ, c-Kit and RET in addition to Raf family members 7. This property confers sorafenib as a powerful drug simultaneously targeting on multiple oncogenic kinases. As expected, preclinical data showed its competent inhibitory effect on tumor formation and progression both ex-vivo andin vivo, and FDA approved sorafenib as a targeted drug for advanced HCC in 2007 8. However, the clinical benefit of sorafenib treatment is still limited with no more than 3 months overall survival advantage 9. The molecular mechanisms underlying sorafenib resistance in HCC are still largely unknown. Notably, sorafenib treated cancers rarely completely regressed and that sorafenib alone did not induce massive cell death 9. Indeed, as a single agent, sorafenib weakly induced cell death, either apoptosis 10 or ferroptosis 11 in cell-type and drug-dose dependent manner. However, in combination with chemical inhibitors or shRNAs targeting on key regulators, sorafenib induces strong cell death in multiple HCC cell lines 12-15, indicating a potential to improve sorafenib efficacy against HCC through enhancing its ability to induce cell death. Therefore, identifying the key regulators and strategies to enhance sorafenib induced cell death might be the key to meet the challenges of advanced HCC treatment. STAT3 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3) is a pivotal transcriptional factor of multiple tumor promoting genes and anti-apoptotic genes, like Mcl-1 (myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1) 16-18. In response to growth factors and inflammatory factors, STAT3 is activated through phosphorylation on 705th tyrosine and 727th serine, leading to its trans-localization from cytoplasm to nucleus 19. In liver cancer cells, Sorafenib dephosphorylates and inhibits STAT3 activity through activating phosphatase SHP2 13, 20, leading to down-regulation of Mcl-1 21. RFX-1/SHP-1 activation could also overcome sorafenib resistance by dephosphorylating STAT3 22. However, the role of STAT3 in determining cellular sensitivity to sorafenib induced cell death in HCC is still largely unknown. Here, we show that HCC cell lines exhibit heterogeneous STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation and cellular sensitivities to sorafenib induced cell death. STAT3-Y705 is constitutively phosphorylated in sorafenib resistant Huh7 and HepG2 cells, but not in sorafenib sensitive Hep3B cells. Over-expression of STAT3 confers Hep3B cells with resistance to sorafenib induced cell death. Reversely, genetic knockdown of STAT3 could sensitize Huh7 cells to sorafenib induced cell death. Supportively, anti-apoptotic Mcl-1 was down regulated in STAT3 knocked down Huh7 and HepG2 cells and up-regulated in STAT3 overexpressed Hep3B cells. Importantly, inhibitors of STAT3 itself by S3i-201 or its upstream kinase JAKs by JAK inhibitor I (JAKi) could synergistically enhance sorafenib induced cell death in both Huh7 and HepG2 cells. Taken together, our data suggest that STAT3 contribute to sorafenib resistance, and inhibition of STAT3 could improve sorafenib efficacy by enhancing sorafenib induced cell death in liver cancer.

Results

STAT3 contributes to cellular resistance to sorafenib induced cell death in HCC cells

Sorafenib is the first FDA approved targeted drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma 9. However, the efficacy of sorafenib in HCC is still limited 9. Recently, accumulating evidence showed that sorafenib could not only inhibit cell growth, but also be able to induce cell death 23. In the light of heterogeneity of HCC cells, we examined the effect of sorafenib to induce cell death in different HCC cell lines. We found that different HCC cell lines exhibited heterogeneous sensitivities to sorafenib induced cell death. Hep3B cells were more sensitive to sorafenib induced cell death compared to Huh7 and HepG2 cells, indicated by microscopy observation (Figure 1A), pI/Hoechst staining assay (Figure 1B) and pI staining followed by FACS analysis (Figure 1C). Interestingly, STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation was much higher in Huh7 and HepG2 cells than that in Hep3B cells (Figure 1D). Supportively, STAT3 nuclear localization was much more intensive in Huh7 and HepG2 cells (Figure 1E). Since tyrosine kinase JAK and phosphatase SHP family are well-known regulators of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation, we also examined the expression of JAK1/2 and SHP1/2. As shown in figure 1D, JAK1/2 expression was also lower in Hep3B cells than that in Huh7 and HepG2 cells. These data indicate that STAT3 activities might play a key role in cellular sensitivity to sorafenib induced cell death in HCC cells.
Figure 1

JAK1/2-STAT3 pathway is associated with cellular sensitivity to sorafenib induced cell death. (A, B, C) Hep3B, HepG2 and Huh7 cells were treated with 5uM Sorafenib for 48hours. Cell death was monitored under microscopy (A), and cell death assay was performed by staining with pI and Hoechst 33342 followed by photograph under microscopy and analyzed by Image J (B) or staining with pI and analyzed by flow cytometry (C). (D) The expressing levels of JAK1, JAK2, STAT3, SHP1, SHP2, actin and phosphorylation levels of STAT3 were determined by western blot using the antibodies, respectively. (E) STAT3 localization was examined in Hep3B, Huh7 and HepG2 cells.

In order to determine the role of STAT3 in sorafenib induced cell death in HCC cells, we knocked down STAT3 in Huh7 cells and over-expressed STAT3 in Hep3B cells, using a lentivirus based system. The ability of sorafenib to induce cell death was monitored. Knockdown of STAT3 reduced STAT3 protein levels and phosphorylation on Y705 or S727 (Figure 2A), while sorafenib induced cell death was significantly increased, indicated by pI/Hoechst staining assay (Figure 2B), and double confirmed by pI/Annexin V staining followed by FACS analysis (Figure 2C). Inversely, over expression of STAT3 in Hep3B increased STAT3 protein levels and phosphorylation on Y705 or S727 (Figure 2D), while sorafenib induced cell death was dramatically attenuated (Figure 2E).
Figure 2

STAT3 contributes to cellular resistance to sorafenib induced cell death. (A) STAT3 was knocked down in Huh7 cells using lentivirus expressing STAT3 shRNAs. Cells were treated with or without 5uM sorafenib for 48 hours. The expression levels of STAT3 and its phosphorylation levels were determined. (B) Huh7 cells expressing scramble shRNA or STAT3 shRNAs were treated with 5uM sorafenib for 72 hours, and then stained with pI and Hoechst, photographed under microscopy and analyzed by Image J. (C) Cells were treated as in (B), and then stained with pI/Annexin V and analyzed by flow cytometry. (D) STAT3 was over-expressed in Hep3B cells using lentivirus expressing STAT3. Cells were treated with or without 5uM sorafenib for 24 hours. The expression levels of STAT3 and its phosphorylation levels were determined. S.E. stands for short exposure, while L.E. represents long exposure. (E) Hep3B cells expressing STAT3 and its parallel control were treated with 5uM sorafenib for 48hours. Cell death assay was performed as in (B). Data of three independent replicates are presented as the mean+/-s.e.m., n=3.

Taken together, these data demonstrate that STAT3 plays a key role in determining the cell sensitivity to sorafenib induced cell death in HCC cells.

STAT3 protects HCC cells from sorafenib induced cell death through regulating Mcl-1 expression

STAT3 has been well known to regulate the expression of Mcl-1 20, 24, a member of Bcl-2 family, which plays a key role in anti-apoptosis 25. It has also been shown that sorafenib treatment leads to down-regulation of Mcl-120. Therefore, we examined Mcl-1 expression in Hep3B, Huh7 and HepG2 cells. As shown in Figure 3A, Mcl-1 expression was higher in Huh7/HepG2 cells than Hep3B cells, which correlated with their STAT3-Y705 phosphorylation levels and sensitivities to sorafenib induced cell death. Moreover, knockdown of STAT3 reduced Mcl-1 expression in Huh7 cells (Figure 3B), while over expression of STAT3 increased Mcl-1 expression in Hep3B cells (Figure 3C). Furthermore, sorafenib induced down-regulation of Mcl-1 in Huh7 cells, but not in STAT3 knocked-down Huh7 cells, indicating the essential role of STAT3 in sorafenib induced down regulation of Mcl-1 (Figure 3D). Taken together, these data indicates that STAT3 might protect HCC cells from sorafenib induced cell death through regulating Mcl-1 expression.
Figure 3

STAT3 protects HCC cells from sorafenib induced cell death through regulating Mcl-1 expression. (A) The expression levels of STAT3, Mcl-1 and GAPDH in Hep3B, Huh7 and HepG2 were determined by Western Blot using anti-STAT3, anti-Mcl-1 and anti-GAPDH antibodies, respectively. (B) STAT3 was knocked down in Huh7 cells. The expression levels of Mcl-1 and STAT3 levels were determined. (C) STAT3 was over-expressed in Hep3B cells. The expression levels of Mcl-1 and STAT3 were determined. (D, E) STAT3 was knocked down in Huh7 cells. Cells were then treated with different doses of sorafenib for 24hours. The expression levels of Mcl-1, STAT3 and its phosphorylation levels were determined (D). The ratio of pSTAT3 to STAT3 was quantified using Image J (E).

Inhibition of STAT3 enhances sorafenib induced cell death in HCC cells

In order to investigate the effect of STAT3 inhibition on sorafenib induced cell death, we used a STAT3 inhibitor, S3i-201, which was identified through a structure-based virtual screening from the NCI chemical libraries 26. Huh7 cells were treated with Sorafenib in the absence or presence of S3i-201. As shown in figure 4A and 4B, combination of S3i-201 with sorafenib lead to down-regulation of STAT3 phosphorylation and Mcl-1 expression, and shrinkage of Huh7 cells, while sorafenib or S3i-201 alone lead to reduction of cell density. Consistently, tetrazolium based cell growth assay showed that sorafenib or S3i-201 alone lead to inhibition of cell growth, while combination of both drugs completely blocked cell growth, as shown by CCK8 assay (Figure 4C). Annexin V/pI staining also showed that combination of S3i-201 could dramatically enhance the ability of sorafenib to induce cell death (Figure 4D and 4E).
Figure 4

STAT3 inhibitor S3i-201 synergistically enhances sorafenib induced cell death. (A) Huh7 cells were treated with S3i-201 (100uM), sorafenib (5uM) or its combination for 24 hours. The expression of STAT3 and Mcl-1, and the phosphorylation level of STAT3 were determined. (B, C) Huh7 cells were treated with 100uM S3i-201 (100uM), Sorafenib (5uM) or their combination for 48 hours. Cell death was monitored by microscopy (B). Cell metabolic activities were monitored by CCK8 assay (C). Data of three independent replicates are presented as the mean+/-s.e.m., n=3. (D, E) Huh7 cells were treated with 5uM sorafenib, 20uM or 100uM S3i-201, or their combination. Cell death assay was performed by pI/Annexin V staining and followed by flow cytometry analysis. Data of three independent replicates are presented as the mean+/-s.e.m., n=3.

Janus kinase (JAK) family members are well known as STAT3 upstream kinases responsible for STAT3 phosphorylation on tyrosine 705. Indeed, JAK inhibitor I (JAKi) alone lead to de-phosphorylation of STAT3 on Y705 27, but not S727 (Figure 5A and 5C). Long term sorafenib treatment alone resulted in de-phosphorylation on both Y705 and S727 phosphorylation on STAT3 (Figure 5A and 5C), as shown previously 20. Combinational treatment of sorafenib with JAKi could lead to synergistic de-phosphorylation of STAT3 and Mcl-1 down-regulation in both Huh7 and HepG2 cells (Figure 5A and 5C). Meanwhile, either sorafenib or JAKi alone had mild effect on cell death, while combination of sorafenib and JAKi dramatically increase the rate of cell death in both Huh7 and HepG2 cells (Figure 5B and 5D). By contrast, sorafenib alone could lead to drastic cell death in Hep3B cells where STAT3 phosphorylation on Y705 is barely detectable, while the effect of combinational treatment to induce cell death was much modest (Figure 5E and 5F). Furthermore, the synergistic effect of sorafenib and JAK inhibitor was also double confirmed using pI staining followed by FACS analysis (Figure 5G). Notably, although long-term sorafenib treatment alone could effectively down-regulate STAT3 phosphorylation levels, there are still residual p-STAT3 (Y705) and p-STAT3(S727) left. Only combination of sorafenib and STAT3 inhibitors could dramatically induce cell death, but not sorafenib alone, indicating that residual p-STAT3(Y705) and p-STAT3(S727) might still protect HCC cells from sorafenib induced cell death. In addition, STAT3 inhibitors might synergistically contribute to sorafenib sensitivities through abrogating the residual STAT3 activities.
Figure 5

JAK inhibitor I enhanced sorafenib induced cell death in STAT3 active HCC cells. (A, C, E) HCC cells were treated with 2uM JAK inhibitor I (JAKi), 5uM Sorafenib or their combination. The expression levels of STAT3, phospho-STAT3 (Y705) phospho-STAT3 (S727), Mcl-1 and GAPDH were determined by Western Blot. (B, D, F) Cell death assays were performed by pI staining and photographed under microscopy. Cell death rate was calculated by Image J. Data of three independent replicates are presented as the mean+/-s.e.m., n=3. (G) Huh7 cells were treated with JAKi (2uM), Sorafenib (5uM) and their combination for 60hours. Cell death assay was performed by pI staining and followed by flow cytometry analysis.

Taken together, these data suggest that STAT3 inhibition could synergistically improve efficacy by enhancing sorafenib induced cell death.

Discussion

In contrast to most cancers, the incidence and death rate of liver cancer is increasing, in part due to the lack of novel and potent drugs and treatments. The first-line targeted drug for advanced HCC is sorafenib, which was approved by FDA in 2007 9. However its overall clinical benefit is still limited 28. Thus, one of the major challenges for biomedical studies of sorafenib is to improve its efficacy against HCC. Accumulating evidences show that sorafenib is capable to induce cell death in high dose 21. Therefore, identification of biomarkers and regulators in determining HCC cell sensitivity to sorafenib induced cell death might contribute to clinical benefit from sorafenib. In this study, we show that three HCC cell lines (Hep3B, Huh7 and HepG2) response to sorafenib induced cell death in a different way. Hep3B with low STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation is much more sensitive to sorafenib induced cell death than HepG2 and Huh7 cells, where STAT3 is highly phosphorylated on Y705. Importantly, up-regulation of STAT3 increases resistance to sorafenib induced cell death in Hep3B cells, while depletion of STAT3 reduces cellular resistance in Huh7 and HepG2 cells, indicating STAT3 plays a pivotal role in protecting HCC cells from sorafenib induced cell death. STAT3 inactivation is accompanied with down-regulation of multiple anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Mcl-1, survivin and Bcl-XL 16. These genes serve as protective shield against spear of sorafenib. Indeed, our study also shows that Mcl-1 is tightly controlled by STAT3 expression. In concert with previous works, our data also show that sorafenib attenuates STAT3 phosphorylation on both 727th serine and 705th tyrosine, indicating STAT3 activities could be suppressed by sorafenib 20. Taken together, it suggests that STAT3 might serve as a “bumper” to protect cancer cells from sorafenib. Recent researches identified many key factors playing similar roles in sorafenib induced cell death, such as Erk, AIB1 and Pin1 29-31. The expression or activities of these genes are also down regulated by sorafenib, while genetic or chemical inhibition of these genes could enhance sorafenib induced cell death. Interestingly, STAT3 could be phosphorylated by Erks 32, while AIB1 and STAT3 are documented to be regulated by Pin1 33, 34, indicating that a network of genes might play a role of “bumper” in sorafenib induced cell death. One might easily propose that attenuating or eradicating the bumper might enhance sorafenib efficacy. Indeed, STAT3 inhibitor or STAT3 upstream kinase JAK inhibitor could synergistically enhance sorafenib induced cell death. Supportively, combinational treatment with other drugs, such as all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) 15, 31 or bufalin 30 could dramatically enhance the ability of sorafenib to induce cell death in HCC cells. These findings strengthen the potential strategy to improve sorafenib efficacy by combinational treatment and enhancing sorafenib induced cell death in liver cancer cells.

Methods and Materials

Cell culture and Reagents

Huh7, HepG2 and Hep3B cells were bought from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Cells were cultured in high glucose DMEM (#12800-017; GIBCO) with 10% FBS (#10437-028; GIBCO). All the cells were cultured in 37 degree centigrade with 5% CO2. GAPDH antibody (#HC301) and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (#FC101) were from Transgene (Beijing, China). Antibodies of anti STAT3 (#9139), anti phospho-STAT3 at Y705 (#9145) or anti phospho-STAT3 at S727 (#94994) were from Cell Signaling (Davers, MA). Mcl-1 (#16225-1-AP), JAK1 (#66466-1-Ig), JAK2 (17670-1-AP), SHP1 (24546-1-AP), SHP2 (20145-1-AP) antibodies was from Proteintech (Wuhan, China). TurboFect Transfection Reagent (#R0532) was from Life Technologies. Sorafenib (#sc-220125) was purchased from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA) and Medchemexpress (#HY-10201, Shanghai, China). JAK inhibitor I (#420099) was from Millipore (Billerica, MA). Polybrene (#107689) and STAT3 inhibitor S3i-201 (#SML0330) was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

RNA interference

STAT3 shRNA expressing lentivirus was bought from Genechem (Shanghai, China). The shRNA sequences are 5'-GCTGACCAACAATCCCAAGAA-3' for STAT3-sh1, 5'- GCACAATCTACGAAGAATCAA-3' for STAT3-sh2, and 5'-GCAAAGAATCACATGCCACTT-3' for STAT3-sh3. To establish STAT3 knocked down cells, Huh7 and HepG2 cells were infected with lentivirus expressing STAT3 shRNA and supplemented with 4ug/ml polybrene.

Cell viability assay

Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate and were treated as indicated. 10ul of CCK-8 was added into 90ul DMEM culture medium. Cells were then incubated at 37℃ and 5% CO2 for 1 hour. Measure the absorbance using Multi-scan GO (Thermo Scientific) at 450nm with 620nm as reference wavelength.

Cell death assay

pI/Hoechst33342 double staining was described previously 35, 36. Briefly, HCC cells were stained with 5ug/mL pI and 5ug/mL Hoechst33342 after treatment as indicated. Cells were photographed under fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axio Observer A1). pI positive cells were considered as dead cells. Hoechst33342 positive cells were considered as total cells. The number of pI or Hoechst positive cells was quantified using Image J (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), respectively. The percentage of cell death was quantified by pI positive cells divided by Hoechst33342 positive cells. Alternatively, cells were stained with pI and analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described 31. Briefly, pI incorporation and cell size were quantified by flow cytometry. pI negative cells with normal size were considered as live cells. pI positive cells with smaller size were considered as dead cells. Annexin V/pI staining was performed following manual instruction of Annexin-V-FLUOS Staining kit (#11988549001) from Roche (Mannheim, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means±s.e.m. The two sample t-test was used to compare differences between treated groups and their paired controls.
  34 in total

1.  A flow cytometric method using Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide for simultaneous cell cycle analysis and apoptosis determination in unfixed cells.

Authors:  F Belloc; P Dumain; M R Boisseau; C Jalloustre; J Reiffers; P Bernard; F Lacombe
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1994-09-01

2.  Interleukin 6 upregulates myeloid cell leukemia-1 expression through a STAT3 pathway in cholangiocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Hajime Isomoto; Shogo Kobayashi; Nathan W Werneburg; Steve F Bronk; Maria Eugenia Guicciardi; David A Frank; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Mary Maluccio; Anne Covey
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Sorafenib enriches epithelial cell adhesion molecule-positive tumor initiating cells and exacerbates a subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma through TSC2-AKT cascade.

Authors:  Dong-Xian Guan; Jie Shi; Yang Zhang; Jiang-Sha Zhao; Ling-Yun Long; Tian-Wei Chen; Er-Bin Zhang; Yuan-Yuan Feng; Wen-Dai Bao; Yue-Zhen Deng; Lin Qiu; Xue-Li Zhang; H Phillip Koeffler; Shu-qun Cheng; Jing-Jing Li; Dong Xie
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  STAT3 suppresses transcription of proapoptotic genes in cancer cells with the involvement of its N-terminal domain.

Authors:  Olga A Timofeeva; Nadya I Tarasova; Xueping Zhang; Sergey Chasovskikh; Amrita K Cheema; Honghe Wang; Milton L Brown; Anatoly Dritschilo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3.

Authors:  Hua Yu; Drew Pardoll; Richard Jove
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Sorafenib inhibits signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells by activating the phosphatase shatterproof 2.

Authors:  Boris R A Blechacz; Rory L Smoot; Steven F Bronk; Nathan W Werneburg; Alphonse E Sirica; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 8.  The role of Raf kinases in malignant transformation.

Authors:  Walter Kolch; Ashwin Kotwaliwale; Keith Vass; Petra Janosch
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 5.600

9.  Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by retinoic acid sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to apoptosis induced by sorafenib.

Authors:  Naoki Ishijima; Keita Kanki; Hiroki Shimizu; Goshi Shiota
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  Multicentric survey on dose reduction/interruption of cancer drug therapy in 12.472 patients: indicators of suspected adverse reactions.

Authors:  Andrea Casadei Gardini; Elena Tenti; Carla Masini; Oriana Nanni; Emanuela Scarpi; Martina Valgiusti; Silvia Restuccia; Maria Laura Gallani; Simonetta Palazzini; Erica Bianchini; Silvia Menozzi; Antonio Maugeri; Dino Amadori; Martina Minguzzi; Giovanni Luca Frassineti
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-28
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Hu; Jing Li; Maorong Fu; Xia Zhao; Wei Wang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-11-26

2.  Ginsenoside Rg3 in combination with artesunate overcomes sorafenib resistance in hepatoma cell and mouse models.

Authors:  Ying-Jie Chen; Jia-Ying Wu; Yu-Yi Deng; Ying Wu; Xiao-Qi Wang; Amy Sze-Man Li; Lut Yi Wong; Xiu-Qiong Fu; Zhi-Ling Yu; Chun Liang
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.735

3.  Modulation of the IL-6-Signaling Pathway in Liver Cells by miRNAs Targeting gp130, JAK1, and/or STAT3.

Authors:  Florence A Servais; Mélanie Kirchmeyer; Matthias Hamdorf; Nadège W E Minoungou; Stefan Rose-John; Stephanie Kreis; Claude Haan; Iris Behrmann
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2019-04-02

4.  LncRNA DANCR Promotes Sorafenib Resistance via Activation of IL-6/STAT3 Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Lamei Chen; Huabing Yuan; Shenghong Guo; Gang Wu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Targeting the JAK/STAT pathway in solid tumors.

Authors:  Zoya Qureshy; Daniel E Johnson; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  J Cancer Metastasis Treat       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 6.  Critical signaling pathways governing hepatocellular carcinoma behavior; small molecule-based approaches.

Authors:  Zahra Farzaneh; Massoud Vosough; Tarun Agarwal; Maryam Farzaneh
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.722

7.  Oxidative Stress Activated by Sorafenib Alters the Temozolomide Sensitivity of Human Glioma Cells Through Autophagy and JAK2/STAT3-AIF Axis.

Authors:  Jianwei Wei; Zhengfeng Wang; Weiwei Wang; Xiaoge Liu; Junhu Wan; Yongjie Yuan; Xueyuan Li; Liwei Ma; Xianzhi Liu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-14

Review 8.  Role of hydrogen sulfide donors in cancer development and progression.

Authors:  Ebenezeri Erasto Ngowi; Attia Afzal; Muhammad Sarfraz; Saadullah Khattak; Shams Uz Zaman; Nazeer Hussain Khan; Tao Li; Qi-Ying Jiang; Xin Zhang; Shao-Feng Duan; Xin-Ying Ji; Dong-Dong Wu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Sorafenib and CuB exert synergistic antitumor effects against hepatocellular carcinoma cells via inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Xiaoli Wang; Hua Li; Dong Li; Yudi Bai; Yao Zhang; Xue Yan; Jin Li; Ri Zhao; Jiahui Liu; Wei Liu; Maolin Shi; Cheng Xu; Tai Yang; Tao Zhang
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.792

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.