| Literature DB >> 29805285 |
Yi Xu1, Quansheng Chen1,2, Yan Liu1, Xin Sun3, Qiping Huang1, Qin Ouyang1, Jiewen Zhao1.
Abstract
This study proposed a rapid microscopic examination method for pork freshness evaluation by using the self-assembled hyperspectral microscopic imaging (HMI) system with the help of feature extraction algorithm and pattern recognition methods. Pork samples were stored for different days ranging from 0 to 5 days and the freshness of samples was divided into three levels which were determined by total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) content. Meanwhile, hyperspectral microscopic images of samples were acquired by HMI system and processed by the following steps for the further analysis. Firstly, characteristic hyperspectral microscopic images were extracted by using principal component analysis (PCA) and then texture features were selected based on the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Next, features data were reduced dimensionality by fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) for further building classification model. Finally, compared with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model and support vector machine (SVM) model, good back propagation artificial neural network (BP-ANN) model obtained the best freshness classification with a 100 % accuracy rating based on the extracted data. The results confirm that the fabricated HMI system combined with multivariate algorithms has ability to evaluate the fresh degree of pork accurately in the microscopic level, which plays an important role in animal food quality control.Entities:
Keywords: fresh degree evaluation; hyperspectral microscopic imaging; pork; texture analysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29805285 PMCID: PMC5960833 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.2.362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the hyperspectral microscopic imaging (HMI) system.
(A) Pictorial diagram of HMI system, (B) Original hyperspectral microscopic datacube, (C) EMCCD: electron-multiplying charge-coupled device.
Fig. 2Results of parameters optimization in SVM model.
SVM, support vector machine.
Fig. 3TVB-N content of pork meat measured in the 1st, 3rd and 5th day.
TVB-N, total volatile basic nitrogen.
Fig. 4Characteristics images at 1st, 3rd and 5th day.
Fig. 5Dominant wavelengths selected by PCA.
PCA, principal component analysis; PC1, principal component 1; PC2, principal component 2; PC3, principal component 3.
Fig. 6Score scatter plot with two FDs of three groups of meat.
FD1, the first FDA factor; FD2, the second FDA facto; FDA, fisher discriminant analysis.
Identification results of LDA, BP-ANN and SVM models
| Models | Subsets | Sample type | Sample number | Discrimination results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | Secondary fresh | Stale | Discrimination rate (%) | ||||
| LDA | Training set | Fresh | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 91.67[ |
| Secondary fresh | 20 | 1 | 16 | 3 | |||
| Stale | 20 | 0 | 1 | 19 | |||
| Prediction set | Fresh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 93.33[ | |
| Secondary fresh | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 | |||
| Stale | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |||
| BP-ANN | Training set | Fresh | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 95.00[ |
| Secondary fresh | 20 | 1 | 18 | 1 | |||
| Stale | 20 | 0 | 1 | 19 | |||
| Prediction set | Fresh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| Secondary fresh | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | |||
| Stale | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |||
| SVM | Training set | Fresh | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 98.33[ |
| Secondary fresh | 20 | 1 | 19 | 0 | |||
| Stale | 20 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |||
| Prediction set | Fresh | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 93.33[ | |
| Secondary fresh | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 | |||
| Stale | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |||
a LDA model in the training set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, three secondary fresh samples were misclassified as stale meat, one stale sample was misclassified as secondary meat.
b LDA model in the prediction set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as stale meat.
c BP-ANN model in the training set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as stale meat, one stale sample was misclassified as secondary fresh meat.
d SVM model in the training set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat.
e SVM model in the prediction set: one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as fresh meat, one secondary fresh sample was misclassified as stale meat.
LDA, linear discriminant analysis; BP-ANN, back propagation artificial neural network; SVM, support vector machine.