Literature DB >> 29805116

Safety and efficacy of elobixibat for chronic constipation: results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial and an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial.

Atsushi Nakajima1, Mitsunori Seki2, Shinya Taniguchi3, Akira Ohta2, Per-Göran Gillberg4, Jan P Mattsson4, Michael Camilleri5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A subset of patients with constipation has reduced colonic bile acid concentrations, which are associated with slow colonic transit. In a previous study, elobixibat, a locally acting ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, accelerated colonic transit in Japanese patients with functional constipation. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of elobixibat for short-term treatment of chronic constipation, and safety, patient satisfaction, and quality of life with long-term treatment.
METHODS: We did two phase 3 studies of patients aged 20-80 years in Japan with at least 6 months of chronic constipation, who satisfied Rome III criteria for functional constipation, including fewer than three spontaneous bowel movements per week. The first trial, including patients enrolled at 16 clinics, was a 2-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which (after a 2-week run-in period) patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either elobixibat 10 mg/day for 2 weeks or placebo. Randomisation was done with permuted block method (block size six) without stratification. Masking to treatment allocation was achieved with identical appearances of elobixibat and placebo, which were supplied in sealed, opaque containers. Group assignment was concealed from patients, investigators, and analysts. The second trial, including patients enrolled at 34 clinics or hospitals, was an open-label, 1-year study in which all patients received elobixibat; participants could titrate the dose to 5 mg/day or 15 mg/day, or maintain the 10 mg/day dose. In both studies, participants took the study drug as an oral tablet once per day before breakfast. The primary outcome of the 2-week randomised trial was the change from baseline (ie, last week of the 2-week run-in) in the frequency of spontaneous bowel movements during week 1 of treatment. The primary outcome of the 52-week open-label trial was safety (type, severity, and incidence of adverse drug reactions) at all times from treatment initiation. All efficacy analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population without imputation for any missing data. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (numbers JapicCTI-153061 and JapicCTI-153062) and have been completed.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 4, 2015, and June 11, 2016, we assigned 133 patients to treatment in the 2-week randomised trial: 70 to elobixibat (69 included in the modified ITT and safety populations) and 63 to placebo. The frequency of spontaneous bowel movements per week during week 1 of treatment was greater with elobixibat (least-squares mean 6·4, 95% CI 5·3-7·6) than with placebo (1·7, 1·2-2·2), p<0·0001). Between Oct 31, 2015, and March 15, 2017, we allocated 341 patients to 52 weeks of elobixibat (340 included in the modified ITT and safety populations). 163 (48%) patients in the 52-week trial had an adverse drug reaction, the most common of which were mild gastrointestinal disorders (in 135 [40%] patients). Inguinal hernia was reported in one patient with elobixibat in the 52-week study as a moderate adverse drug reaction. The most common adverse drug reactions in both trials were mild abdominal pain (13 [19%] patients with elobixibat and one [2%] with placebo in the 2-week randomised trial, and 82 [24%] patients in the 52-week trial) and diarrhoea (nine [13%] patients with elobixibat and none with placebo in the 2-week randomised trial and 50 [15%] in the 52-week trial).
INTERPRETATION: Elobixibat resolved constipation in the short-term, and was well tolerated with both short-term and long-term treatment. The evidence supports the use of this novel approach to increase intracolonic concentrations of endogenous bile acid for the treatment of chronic constipation. FUNDING: EA Pharma and Mochida Pharmaceutical.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29805116     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30123-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  38 in total

Review 1.  What's in the pipeline for lower functional gastrointestinal disorders in the next 5 years?

Authors:  Michael Camilleri
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 2.  Intestinal Absorption of Bile Acids in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Alexander L Ticho; Pooja Malhotra; Pradeep K Dudeja; Ravinder K Gill; Waddah A Alrefai
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Contributions of bile acids to gastrointestinal physiology as receptor agonists and modifiers of ion channels.

Authors:  Stephen J Keely; Andreacarola Urso; Alexandr V Ilyaskin; Christoph Korbmacher; Nigel W Bunnett; Daniel P Poole; Simona E Carbone
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Gut microbiota: a new avenue to reveal pathological mechanisms of constipation.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Yu Wang; Yun Zhang; Wenwen Li; Shu Jiang; Dawei Qian; Jinao Duan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.560

5.  Rationale and design of a multicenter, single-group, open-label trial aiming at investigating the effectiveness of elobixibat for loss of defecation desire in patients with chronic constipation.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamamoto; Takaomi Kessoku; Kosuke Tanaka; Kota Takahashi; Yuki Kasai; Anna Ozaki; Michihiro Iwaki; Takashi Kobayashi; Tsutomu Yoshihara; Noboru Misawa; Kanji Ohkuma; Akiko Fuyuki; Takuma Higurashi; Kunihiro Hosono; Masato Yoneda; Tomoyuki Iwasaki; Takeo Kurihashi; Machiko Nakatogawa; Ayao Suzuki; Masataka Taguri; Shunsuke Oyamada; Keisuke Ariyoshi; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Yasushi Ichikawa; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-06-27

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Elobixibat in Elderly Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Single-center, Observational Study.

Authors:  Tatsuya Abe; Masao Kunimoto; Yoshikazu Hachiro; Kei Ohara; Mitsuhiro Inagaki; Masanori Murakami
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2020-07-30

Review 7.  Management of functional constipation in children and adults.

Authors:  Mana H Vriesman; Ilan J N Koppen; Michael Camilleri; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Marc A Benninga
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 8.  Review article: diagnosis, management and patient perspectives of the spectrum of constipation disorders.

Authors:  Amol Sharma; Satish S C Rao; Kimberly Kearns; Kimberly D Orleck; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  The Efficacy and Safety of Elobixibat for the Elderly with Chronic Constipation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Akira Tomie; Naohisa Yoshida; Munehiro Kugai; Ryohei Hirose; Osamu Dohi; Ken Inoue; Kotaro Okuda; Takayuki Motoyoshi; Kohei Fukumoto; Yoshikazu Inagaki; Hiroyuki Yoriki; Yutaka Inada; Takashi Okuda; Daisuke Hasegawa; Kiyoshi Ogiso; Takaaki Murakami; Koichi Soga; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Norimasa Yoshida; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  Targeting the Four Pillars of Enterohepatic Bile Salt Cycling; Lessons From Genetics and Pharmacology.

Authors:  Roni F Kunst; Henkjan J Verkade; Ronald P J Oude Elferink; Stan F J van de Graaf
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 17.425

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.