| Literature DB >> 29804906 |
Andreas Hjelm Brandt1, Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen2, Caroline Ewertsen2, Simon Holbek3, Jacob Bjerring Olesen3, Ramin Moshavegh3, Carsten Thomsen4, Jørgen Arendt Jensen3, Michael Bachmann Nielsen2.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance phase contrast angiography (MRA) is the gold standard for blood flow evaluation. Spectral Doppler ultrasound (SDU) is the first clinical choice, although the method is angle dependent. Vector flow imaging (VFI) is an angle-independent ultrasound method. The aim of the study was to compare VFI- and SDU-estimated peak systolic velocities (PSV) of the common carotid artery (CCA) with PSV obtained by MRA. Furthermore, intra- and inter-observer agreement was determined. MRA estimates were significantly different from SDU estimates (left CCA: p < 0.001, right CCA: p < 0.001), but not from VFI estimates (left CCA: p = 0.28, right CCA: p = 0.18). VFI measured lower PSV in both CCAs compared with SDU (p < 0.001) with improved precision (VFI: left: 24%, right: 18%; SDU: left 38%, right: 23%). Intra- and inter-observer agreement was almost perfect for VFI and SDU (inter-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.88, SDU 0.91; intra-observer correlation coefficient: VFI 0.96, SDU 0.97). VFI is more accurate than SDU in evaluating PSV compared with MRA.Entities:
Keywords: Common carotid artery; Magnetic resonance phase contrast angiography; Peak systolic velocity; Spectral Doppler ultrasound; Vector flow imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29804906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol ISSN: 0301-5629 Impact factor: 2.998