Sara Baird1, Monica D Gagnon2, Gabrielle deFiebre3, Emily Briglia4, Rebecca Crowder5, Linda Prine6. 1. The Institute for Family Health, 1824 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10035, USA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA. Electronic address: s1baird@ucsd.edu. 2. The Institute for Family Health, 1824 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10035, USA. Electronic address: monica.gagnon@mail.utoronto.ca. 3. The Institute for Family Health, 1824 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10035, USA; CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, 55 W 125th St, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: Gydefiebre@gmail.com. 4. CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, 55 W 125th St, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: Emily.briglia@gmail.com. 5. The Institute for Family Health, 1824 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10035, USA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA. Electronic address: Rebeccarcrowder@gmail.com. 6. The Institute for Family Health, 1824 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10035, USA; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA. Electronic address: Lindaprine@mac.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To understand the reasons why women present to the Emergency Room (ER) for Early Pregnancy Loss (EPL)-related care, how they perceive care and counseling there, and their overall experience during and after their visit. STUDY DESIGN: This qualitative study utilized semi-structured telephone interviews. Participants were recruited in a large urban ER; women who experienced EPL were interviewed by telephone about their experiences 1-3 weeks after their visit. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded by two independent coders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews without the use of formal outcome measurement tools. RESULTS: Of the sixty-seven women recruited, ten completed the full telephone interview. Interview participants' responses were grouped into four categories: Feelings about EPL, reasons for going to the ER, experience in the ER, and experience after leaving the ER. Women had mixed feelings about their ER experiences; many reported chaos, lack of information or lack of emotional support, while a few felt informed and supported. Many did not know much about EPL before their experience. CONCLUSIONS: ER care for women experiencing suspected or confirmed EPL may not be addressing the emotional needs and knowledge gaps of women. Patient education, emotional support, and clear plans for outpatient follow up are critical. Further research is needed to guide interventions to improve care.
OBJECTIVES: To understand the reasons why women present to the Emergency Room (ER) for Early Pregnancy Loss (EPL)-related care, how they perceive care and counseling there, and their overall experience during and after their visit. STUDY DESIGN: This qualitative study utilized semi-structured telephone interviews. Participants were recruited in a large urban ER; women who experienced EPL were interviewed by telephone about their experiences 1-3 weeks after their visit. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded by two independent coders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews without the use of formal outcome measurement tools. RESULTS: Of the sixty-seven women recruited, ten completed the full telephone interview. Interview participants' responses were grouped into four categories: Feelings about EPL, reasons for going to the ER, experience in the ER, and experience after leaving the ER. Women had mixed feelings about their ER experiences; many reported chaos, lack of information or lack of emotional support, while a few felt informed and supported. Many did not know much about EPL before their experience. CONCLUSIONS: ER care for women experiencing suspected or confirmed EPL may not be addressing the emotional needs and knowledge gaps of women. Patient education, emotional support, and clear plans for outpatient follow up are critical. Further research is needed to guide interventions to improve care.
Authors: Carolyn A Miller; Andrea H Roe; Arden McAllister; Zachary F Meisel; Nathanael Koelper; Courtney A Schreiber Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Lyndsey S Benson; Sara L Magnusson; Kristen E Gray; Kelly Quinley; Larry Kessler; Lisa S Callegari Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2021-11-05
Authors: Ewa Rzońca; Agnieszka Bień; Grażyna Bączek; Patryk Rzońca; Michał Filip; Robert Gałązkowski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jessica K Wu; Emily N Sadecki; Moira A Kyweluk; Suneeta Senapati; Anne N Flynn; Elizabeth Steider; Tracey Thomas; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: F S Rep Date: 2022-07-09