Literature DB >> 29804746

Long-Distance Relationships: Suppression of Repeat-Mediated Deletions.

Maria E Morales1, Tiffany Kaul1, Prescott Deininger2.   

Abstract

The high proportion of repetitive DNA sequences in the human genome provides tremendous opportunities for DNA rearrangements between non-allelic repetitive elements. The genome must use multiple competing and collaborating repair mechanisms to minimize these types of DNA rearrangements, some of which fail in cancer cells where DNA repair pathways are suppressed.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29804746      PMCID： PMC6054550          DOI： 10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN： 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  9 in total

1.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

Authors:  E S Lander; L M Linton; B Birren; C Nusbaum; M C Zody; J Baldwin; K Devon; K Dewar; M Doyle; W FitzHugh; R Funke; D Gage; K Harris; A Heaford; J Howland; L Kann; J Lehoczky; R LeVine; P McEwan; K McKernan; J Meldrim; J P Mesirov; C Miranda; W Morris; J Naylor; C Raymond; M Rosetti; R Santos; A Sheridan; C Sougnez; Y Stange-Thomann; N Stojanovic; A Subramanian; D Wyman; J Rogers; J Sulston; R Ainscough; S Beck; D Bentley; J Burton; C Clee; N Carter; A Coulson; R Deadman; P Deloukas; A Dunham; I Dunham; R Durbin; L French; D Grafham; S Gregory; T Hubbard; S Humphray; A Hunt; M Jones; C Lloyd; A McMurray; L Matthews; S Mercer; S Milne; J C Mullikin; A Mungall; R Plumb; M Ross; R Shownkeen; S Sims; R H Waterston; R K Wilson; L W Hillier; J D McPherson; M A Marra; E R Mardis; L A Fulton; A T Chinwalla; K H Pepin; W R Gish; S L Chissoe; M C Wendl; K D Delehaunty; T L Miner; A Delehaunty; J B Kramer; L L Cook; R S Fulton; D L Johnson; P J Minx; S W Clifton; T Hawkins; E Branscomb; P Predki; P Richardson; S Wenning; T Slezak; N Doggett; J F Cheng; A Olsen; S Lucas; C Elkin; E Uberbacher; M Frazier; R A Gibbs; D M Muzny; S E Scherer; J B Bouck; E J Sodergren; K C Worley; C M Rives; J H Gorrell; M L Metzker; S L Naylor; R S Kucherlapati; D L Nelson; G M Weinstock; Y Sakaki; A Fujiyama; M Hattori; T Yada; A Toyoda; T Itoh; C Kawagoe; H Watanabe; Y Totoki; T Taylor; J Weissenbach; R Heilig; W Saurin; F Artiguenave; P Brottier; T Bruls; E Pelletier; C Robert; P Wincker; D R Smith; L Doucette-Stamm; M Rubenfield; K Weinstock; H M Lee; J Dubois; A Rosenthal; M Platzer; G Nyakatura; S Taudien; A Rump; H Yang; J Yu; J Wang; G Huang; J Gu; L Hood; L Rowen; A Madan; S Qin; R W Davis; N A Federspiel; A P Abola; M J Proctor; R M Myers; J Schmutz; M Dickson; J Grimwood; D R Cox; M V Olson; R Kaul; C Raymond; N Shimizu; K Kawasaki; S Minoshima; G A Evans; M Athanasiou; R Schultz; B A Roe; F Chen; H Pan; J Ramser; H Lehrach; R Reinhardt; W R McCombie; M de la Bastide; N Dedhia; H Blöcker; K Hornischer; G Nordsiek; R Agarwala; L Aravind; J A Bailey; A Bateman; S Batzoglou; E Birney; P Bork; D G Brown; C B Burge; L Cerutti; H C Chen; D Church; M Clamp; R R Copley; T Doerks; S R Eddy; E E Eichler; T S Furey; J Galagan; J G Gilbert; C Harmon; Y Hayashizaki; D Haussler; H Hermjakob; K Hokamp; W Jang; L S Johnson; T A Jones; S Kasif; A Kaspryzk; S Kennedy; W J Kent; P Kitts; E V Koonin; I Korf; D Kulp; D Lancet; T M Lowe; A McLysaght; T Mikkelsen; J V Moran; N Mulder; V J Pollara; C P Ponting; G Schuler; J Schultz; G Slater; A F Smit; E Stupka; J Szustakowki; D Thierry-Mieg; J Thierry-Mieg; L Wagner; J Wallis; R Wheeler; A Williams; Y I Wolf; K H Wolfe; S P Yang; R F Yeh; F Collins; M S Guyer; J Peterson; A Felsenfeld; K A Wetterstrand; A Patrinos; M J Morgan; P de Jong; J J Catanese; K Osoegawa; H Shizuya; S Choi; Y J Chen; J Szustakowki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Lorraine S Symington; Jean Gautier
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 3.  Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders.

Authors:  Claudia M B Carvalho; James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break.

Authors:  Raphael Ceccaldi; Beatrice Rondinelli; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Heteroduplex rejection during single-strand annealing requires Sgs1 helicase and mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh6 but not Pms1.

Authors:  Neal Sugawara; Tamara Goldfarb; Barbara Studamire; Eric Alani; James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  I-SceI-based assays to examine distinct repair outcomes of mammalian chromosomal double strand breaks.

Authors:  Amanda Gunn; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Mammalian non-LTR retrotransposons: for better or worse, in sickness and in health.

Authors:  Victoria P Belancio; Dale J Hedges; Prescott Deininger
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Repeat-mediated deletions can be induced by a chromosomal break far from a repeat, but multiple pathways suppress such rearrangements.

Authors:  Carlos Mendez-Dorantes; Ragini Bhargava; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The contribution of alu elements to mutagenic DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Maria E Morales; Travis B White; Vincent A Streva; Cecily B DeFreece; Dale J Hedges; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.917
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes reveals phylogenetic relationships and intraspecific variation in the medicinal plant Isodon rubescens.

Authors:  Conglong Lian; Hao Yang; Jinxu Lan; Xueyu Zhang; Fei Zhang; Jingfan Yang; Suiqing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.