Literature DB >> 29804286

Synaptic activity induces input-specific rearrangements in a targeted synaptic protein interaction network.

Jonathan D Lautz1, Emily A Brown1, Alison A Williams VanSchoiack1, Stephen E P Smith1,2,3.   

Abstract

Cells utilize dynamic, network-level rearrangements in highly interconnected protein interaction networks to transmit and integrate information from distinct signaling inputs. Despite the importance of protein interaction network dynamics, the organizational logic underlying information flow through these networks is not well understood. Previously, we developed the quantitative multiplex co-immunoprecipitation platform, which allows for the simultaneous and quantitative measurement of the amount of co-association between large numbers of proteins in shared complexes. Here, we adapt quantitative multiplex co-immunoprecipitation to define the activity-dependent dynamics of an 18-member protein interaction network in order to better understand the underlying principles governing glutamatergic signal transduction. We first establish that immunoprecipitation detected by flow cytometry can detect activity-dependent changes in two known protein-protein interactions (Homer1-mGluR5 and PSD-95-SynGAP). We next demonstrate that neuronal stimulation elicits a coordinated change in our targeted protein interaction network, characterized by the initial dissociation of Homer1 and SynGAP-containing complexes followed by increased associations among glutamate receptors and PSD-95. Finally, we show that stimulation of distinct glutamate receptor types results in different modular sets of protein interaction network rearrangements, and that cells activate both modules in order to integrate complex inputs. This analysis demonstrates that cells respond to distinct types of glutamatergic input by modulating different combinations of protein co-associations among a targeted network of proteins. Our data support a model of synaptic plasticity in which synaptic stimulation elicits dissociation of pre-existing multiprotein complexes, opening binding slots in scaffold proteins and allowing for the recruitment of additional glutamatergic receptors. Open Science: This manuscript was awarded with the Open Materials Badge. For more information see: https://cos.io/our-services/open-science-badges/.
© 2018 International Society for Neurochemistry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SynGAP; glutamate signaling; homer; protein interaction network; quantitative multiplex immunoprecipitation; synapse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29804286      PMCID: PMC6150823          DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurochem        ISSN: 0022-3042            Impact factor:   5.372


  60 in total

1.  Regulation of AMPA receptor endocytosis by a signaling mechanism shared with LTD.

Authors:  E C Beattie; R C Carroll; X Yu; W Morishita; H Yasuda; M von Zastrow; R C Malenka
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Isolation of 2000-kDa complexes of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and postsynaptic density 95 from mouse brain.

Authors:  H Husi; S G Grant
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Rapid dispersion of SynGAP from synaptic spines triggers AMPA receptor insertion and spine enlargement during LTP.

Authors:  Yoichi Araki; Menglong Zeng; Mingjie Zhang; Richard L Huganir
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Metabotropic glutamate receptors: physiology, pharmacology, and disease.

Authors:  Colleen M Niswender; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 13.820

5.  Spine-type-specific recruitment of newly synthesized AMPA receptors with learning.

Authors:  Naoki Matsuo; Leon Reijmers; Mark Mayford
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase activation is required for metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent long-term depression in hippocampal area CA1.

Authors:  Sean M Gallagher; Christine A Daly; Mark F Bear; Kimberly M Huber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Elevated CaMKIIα and Hyperphosphorylation of Homer Mediate Circuit Dysfunction in a Fragile X Syndrome Mouse Model.

Authors:  Weirui Guo; Laura Ceolin; Katie A Collins; Julie Perroy; Kimberly M Huber
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Cell type–specific channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice for optogenetic dissection of neural circuitry function.

Authors:  Shengli Zhao; Jonathan T Ting; Hisham E Atallah; Li Qiu; Jie Tan; Bernd Gloss; George J Augustine; Karl Deisseroth; Minmin Luo; Ann M Graybiel; Guoping Feng
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Camkii-mediated phosphorylation regulates distributions of Syngap-α1 and -α2 at the postsynaptic density.

Authors:  Yijung Yang; Jung-Hwa Tao-Cheng; K Ulrich Bayer; Thomas S Reese; Ayse Dosemeci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors.

Authors:  A C Penn; C L Zhang; F Georges; L Royer; C Breillat; E Hosy; J D Petersen; Y Humeau; D Choquet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  13 in total

1.  Reintroduction of the archaic variant of NOVA1 in cortical organoids alters neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Cleber A Trujillo; Edward S Rice; Nathan K Schaefer; Isaac A Chaim; Emily C Wheeler; Assael A Madrigal; Justin Buchanan; Sebastian Preissl; Allen Wang; Priscilla D Negraes; Ryan A Szeto; Roberto H Herai; Alik Huseynov; Mariana S A Ferraz; Fernando S Borges; Alexandre H Kihara; Ashley Byrne; Maximillian Marin; Christopher Vollmers; Angela N Brooks; Jonathan D Lautz; Katerina Semendeferi; Beth Shapiro; Gene W Yeo; Stephen E P Smith; Richard E Green; Alysson R Muotri
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  A perspective on molecular signalling dysfunction, its clinical relevance and therapeutics in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sushmitha S Purushotham; Neeharika M N Reddy; Michelle Ninochka D'Souza; Nilpawan Roy Choudhury; Anusa Ganguly; Niharika Gopalakrishna; Ravi Muddashetty; James P Clement
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Correlative Assembly of Subsynaptic Nanoscale Organizations During Development.

Authors:  Shi-Yan Sun; Xiao-Wei Li; Ran Cao; Yang Zhao; Nengyin Sheng; Ai-Hui Tang
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-24

4.  Quantification of Protein Interaction Network Dynamics using Multiplexed Co-Immunoprecipitation.

Authors:  Emily A Brown; Steven C Neier; Claudia Neuhauser; Adam G Schrum; Stephen E P Smith
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Resolving the Synaptic versus Developmental Dichotomy of Autism Risk Genes.

Authors:  Whitney E Heavner; Stephen E P Smith
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Remodeling of the Homer-Shank interactome mediates homeostatic plasticity.

Authors:  Whitney E Heavner; Jonathan D Lautz; Haley E Speed; Edward P Gniffke; Karen B Immendorf; John P Welsh; Nathan A Baertsch; Stephen E P Smith
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.517

7.  SynGAP isoforms differentially regulate synaptic plasticity and dendritic development.

Authors:  Yoichi Araki; Ingie Hong; Timothy R Gamache; Shaowen Ju; Leonardo Collado-Torres; Joo Heon Shin; Richard L Huganir
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Clustering the autisms using glutamate synapse protein interaction networks from cortical and hippocampal tissue of seven mouse models.

Authors:  Emily A Brown; Jonathan D Lautz; Tessa R Davis; Edward P Gniffke; Alison A W VanSchoiack; Steven C Neier; Noah Tashbook; Chiara Nicolini; Margaret Fahnestock; Adam G Schrum; Stephen E P Smith
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 7.509

9.  Intramolecular domain dynamics regulate synaptic MAGUK protein interactions.

Authors:  Nils Rademacher; Benno Kuropka; Stella-Amrei Kunde; Markus C Wahl; Christian Freund; Sarah A Shoichet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Activity-dependent changes in synaptic protein complex composition are consistent in different detergents despite differential solubility.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lautz; Edward P Gniffke; Emily A Brown; Karen B Immendorf; Ryan D Mendel; Stephen E P Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.