OBJECTIVES: The uric acid (UA) level is related to cardiac events and mortality, but little is known about the clinical significance of serum UA with regard to the ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) risk in patients with heart failure. METHODS: The present study enrolled 56 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (37 males, mean age 64.7 ± 11.1 years) who received prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Based on a median serum UA value, study subjects were divided into two groups: serum UA < 6.1 mg/dL (group L, n = 29) and ≥6.1 mg/dL (group H, n = 27). Echo- and electrocardiograms (QRS duration and QTc intervals) were examined in each group. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (30 ± 8 months), 22 (39%) patients had appropriate ICD therapies for sustained VT. There was no significant difference in the electro- and echocardiographic data between both groups. However, appropriate ICD therapies were significantly higher in group H than in group L (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, UA was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies (hazard ratio 1.826, 95% confidence interval 1.248-2.671, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Serum UA levels might be a predictor of VT, providing new aspects regarding the decision to adapt ICD implantation in patients with heart failure.
OBJECTIVES: The uric acid (UA) level is related to cardiac events and mortality, but little is known about the clinical significance of serum UA with regard to the ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) risk in patients with heart failure. METHODS: The present study enrolled 56 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (37 males, mean age 64.7 ± 11.1 years) who received prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Based on a median serum UA value, study subjects were divided into two groups: serum UA < 6.1 mg/dL (group L, n = 29) and ≥6.1 mg/dL (group H, n = 27). Echo- and electrocardiograms (QRS duration and QTc intervals) were examined in each group. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (30 ± 8 months), 22 (39%) patients had appropriate ICD therapies for sustained VT. There was no significant difference in the electro- and echocardiographic data between both groups. However, appropriate ICD therapies were significantly higher in group H than in group L (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, UA was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapies (hazard ratio 1.826, 95% confidence interval 1.248-2.671, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Serum UA levels might be a predictor of VT, providing new aspects regarding the decision to adapt ICD implantation in patients with heart failure.