Literature DB >> 29803346

Is It Possible to Improve Prognostic Classification in Patients Affected by Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With an Intermediate or Poor Prognosis?

Roberto Iacovelli1, Ugo De Giorgi2, Luca Galli3, Paolo Zucali4, Franco Nolè5, Roberto Sabbatini6, Anna Paola Fraccon7, Umberto Basso8, Alessandra Mosca9, Francesco Atzori10, Daniele Santini11, Gaetano Facchini12, Giuseppe Fornarini13, Felice Pasini7, Cristina Masini14, Francesco Massari15, Sebastiano Buti16, Teodoro Sava17, Cosimo Sacco18, Riccardo Ricotta19, Isabella Sperduti20, Giampaolo Tortora21, Camillo Porta22.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International mRCC (metastatic renal cell carcinoma) Database Consortium (IMDC) is the standard classification for mRCC. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a large cohort of patients with an intermediate or a poor prognosis treated with sunitinib using a different cutoff point for IMDC to improve the classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with an intermediate or a poor prognosis according to the IMDC criteria and treated with sunitinib were included in the present study. A new cutoff point was used to categorize the patients. The new score was validated in an independent cohort of patients.
RESULTS: A total of 457 patients were included in the present study. Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were highlighted regarding the number of prognostic factors. Three categories were identified according to the presence of 1 (ie, favorable-intermediate group), 2 (ie, real-intermediate group), and > 2 (ie, poor group) factors. The corresponding median OS periods were 32.9, 20.0, and 8.9 months, with significant differences among the groups. The validation cohort included 389 patients. The median OS period for the favorable-intermediate group, real-intermediate group, and poor group was 34.3, 19.4, and 9.0 months, respectively, with confirmed significant differences among the groups.
CONCLUSION: Our analysis revealed significant differences among patients with an intermediate prognosis using the IMDC prognostic factors. Further investigations to optimize the use of available and upcoming therapies are required.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intermediate risk; Overall survival; Poor risk; Sunitinib; mRCC

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29803346     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  10 in total

1.  Should CARMENA Really Change our Attitude Towards Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Francesco Massari; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Lidia Gatto; Matteo Santoni; Riccardo Schiavina; Laura Cosmai; Eugenio Brunocilla; Andrea Ardizzoni; Camillo Porta
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Efficacy of Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab According to Number of IMDC Risk Factors in CheckMate 214.

Authors:  Bernard Escudier; Robert J Motzer; Nizar M Tannir; Camillo Porta; Yoshihiko Tomita; Matthew A Maurer; M Brent McHenry; Brian I Rini
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Compassionate Use Program of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Intermediate or Poor Risk Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Large Multicenter Italian Study.

Authors:  Umberto Basso; Federico Paolieri; Mimma Rizzo; Ugo De Giorgi; Sergio Bracarda; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Francesco Atzori; Giacomo Cartenì; Giuseppe Procopio; Lucia Fratino; Manolo D'Arcangelo; Giuseppe Fornarini; Paolo Zucali; Antonio Cusmai; Matteo Santoni; Stefania Pipitone; Claudia Carella; Stefano Panni; Filippo Maria Deppieri; Vittorina Zagonel; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in IMDC favorable- and intermediate-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of Chinese patients.

Authors:  Aihetaimujiang Anwaier; Jianhui Chen; Hongfeng Zhou; Xinxin Zhao; Song Zheng; Xiaofan Li; Yuanyuan Qu; Guohai Shi; Hailiang Zhang; Jin Wu; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-05

5.  Validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) score within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database: A new tool to predict survival in surgically treated renal cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Sebastiano Buti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Melissa Bersanelli; Umberto Capitanio; Zhe Tian; Alessio Cortellini; Satoru Taguchi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Francesco Leonardi; Marco Bandini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Pazopanib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a single-center, real-world, retrospective Chinese study.

Authors:  Jianhui Chen; Wen Ye; Wei Jiang; Xiaofan Li; Rong Liu; Bijuan Lin; Jingnan Xiang; Wei Tian; Junjie Bai; Teng Zuo; Bingxin Lin; Yinan Guo; Song Zheng
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-03

7.  Identification of international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC) intermediate-risk subgroups in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Annalisa Guida; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Carolina Alves; Emeline Colomba; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Lisa Derosa; Ronan Flippot; Bernard Escudier; Laurence Albiges
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Application of the Meet-URO score to metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with second- and third-line cabozantinib.

Authors:  Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Luigi Cerbone; Alessio Signori; Matteo Santoni; Veronica Murianni; Ugo De Giorgi; Giuseppe Procopio; Camillo Porta; Michele Milella; Umberto Basso; Francesco Massari; Marco Maruzzo; Roberto Iacovelli; Nicola Battelli; Luca Carmisciano; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Sebastiano Buti; Giuseppe Fornarini
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 8.168

9.  Predictive value of De Ritis ratio in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Florian Janisch; Thomas Klotzbücher; Roland Dahlem; Michael Rink; Phillip Marks; Christina Kienapfel; Christian P Meyer; Hang Yu; Constantin Fühner; Tobias Hillemacher; Keiichiro Mori; Hadi Mostafei; Shahrokh F Shariat; Margit Fisch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Inflammatory indices and clinical factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab: the development of a novel prognostic score (Meet-URO 15 study).

Authors:  Sara Elena Rebuzzi; Alessio Signori; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Marco Maruzzo; Ugo De Giorgi; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Andrea Sbrana; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Cristina Masini; Emanuele Naglieri; Giuseppe Procopio; Sara Merler; Laura Tomasello; Lucia Fratino; Cinzia Baldessari; Riccardo Ricotta; Stefano Panni; Veronica Mollica; Maria Sorarù; Matteo Santoni; Alessio Cortellini; Veronica Prati; Hector Josè Soto Parra; Marco Stellato; Francesco Atzori; Sandro Pignata; Carlo Messina; Marco Messina; Franco Morelli; Giuseppe Prati; Franco Nolè; Francesca Vignani; Alessia Cavo; Giandomenico Roviello; Francesco Pierantoni; Chiara Casadei; Melissa Bersanelli; Silvia Chiellino; Federico Paolieri; Matteo Perrino; Matteo Brunelli; Roberto Iacovelli; Camillo Porta; Sebastiano Buti; Giuseppe Fornarini
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 8.168

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.