Literature DB >> 29803146

Temporal-Spatial Values During a 180° Step Turn in People with Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation.

Sheila M Clemens1, Glenn K Klute2, Neva J Kirk-Sanchez3, Michele A Raya3, Kyoung Jae Kim3, Ignacio A Gaunaurd4, Robert S Gailey4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Daily ambulation with a prosthesis often involves turning to negotiate within the home and community environments, however how people with lower limb loss perform turns is infrequently studied. Administering a common clinical outcome measure to capture turn performance data provides a convenient means of assessing this ubiquitous activity. RESEARCH QUESTION: What temporal-spatial parameters are exhibited by people with unilateral lower limb amputation while performing a 180˚ turn task?
METHODS: Forty community-ambulating subjects with unilateral lower limb amputation (20 transtibial amputees, 20 transfemoral amputees) performed the Component Timed-Up-and-Go (cTUG) test turning once in each direction, both toward the intact and toward the prosthetic limb. An instrumented walkway captured temporal-spatial parameters during performance of the 180˚ turn task of the cTUG, while a custom iPad application recorded time and number of steps to perform the turn. Comparisons between turn direction and level of amputation during the cTUG and temporal-spatial results were assessed.
RESULTS: People with lower limb amputation spent more time on their intact limb while turning than their prosthetic limb regardless of the position of the intact limb, and those with transfemoral amputation spent significantly more time over the intact limb than those with transtibial amputation. Additionally, subjects with transfemoral amputation performed the turn significantly faster when turning with an inner intact limb. SIGNIFICANCE: Amputees use different movement strategies with altered temporal-spatial characteristics to turn depending on the direction of the turn and the level of amputation. Clinical use of the cTUG could provide evidence supporting prosthetic prescription practice and introduction of novel physical therapy interventions for individuals with lower limb amputation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputee mobility; Lower limb amputation; Outcome measures; Turning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29803146     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  4 in total

1.  Differences in Measures of Strength and Dynamic Balance Among Individuals With Lower-Limb Loss Classified as Functional Level K3 Versus K4.

Authors:  Emma Haldane Beisheim; John Robert Horne; Ryan Todd Pohlig; Jaclyn Megan Sions
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.159

2.  Gait asymmetry is associated with performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation.

Authors:  Mayank Seth; Peter C Coyle; Ryan T Pohlig; Emma H Beisheim; John R Horne; Gregory E Hicks; Jaclyn Megan Sions
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  The feasibility and validity of a wearable sensor system to assess the stability of high-functioning lower-limb prosthesis users.

Authors:  Kyle T Miller; Molly Russell; Terese Jenks; Kaddie Surratt; Kelly Poretti; Samantha S Eigenbrot; Jonathan S Akins; Matthew J Major
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2020-08-11

4.  Instrumented Four Square Step Test in Adults with Transfemoral Amputation: Test-Retest Reliability and Discriminant Validity between Two Types of Microprocessor Knees.

Authors:  Arnaud Gouelle; Michael Jason Highsmith
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.