Literature DB >> 29802886

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile isolated from food and environmental sources in Western Australia.

Su-Chen Lim1, Grace O Androga2, Daniel R Knight3, Peter Moono1, Niki F Foster4, Thomas V Riley5.   

Abstract

We recently reported a high prevalence of Clostridium difficile in retail vegetables, compost and lawn in Western Australia. The objective of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of previously isolated food and environmental C. difficile isolates from Western Australia. A total of 274 C. difficile isolates from vegetables, compost and lawn were tested for susceptibility to a panel of 10 antimicrobial agents (fidaxomicin, vancomycin, metronidazole, rifaximin, clindamycin, erythromycin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, moxifloxacin, meropenem and tetracycline) using the agar incorporation method. Fidaxomicin was the most potent agent (MIC50/MIC90, 0.06/0.12 mg/L). Resistance to fidaxomicin and metronidazole was not detected and resistance to vancomycin (0.7%) and moxifloxacin (0.7%) was low. However, 103 isolates (37.6%) showed resistance to at least one agent, and multidrug resistance was observed in 3.9% of the resistant isolates (4/103), all of which came from compost. A significantly greater proportion of compost isolates were resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin and tetracycline compared with food and/or lawn isolates. Clostridium difficile ribotype (RT) 014/020 showed greater clindamycin resistance than other less common RTs (P = 0.008, χ2). Contaminated vegetables, compost and lawn could be playing an intermediary role in the transmission of C. difficile from animals to humans. Environmental strains of C. difficile could also function as a reservoir for antimicrobial resistance genes of clinical relevance. This study provides a baseline for future surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in environmental C. difficile isolates in Australia.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial; Australia; Clostridium difficile; Environmental; Food; Resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802886     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  5 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Keeley O'Grady; Daniel R Knight; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Risk for Asymptomatic Household Transmission of Clostridioides difficile Infection Associated with Recently Hospitalized Family Members.

Authors:  Aaron C Miller; Alan T Arakkal; Daniel K Sewell; Alberto M Segre; Sriram V Pemmaraju; Philip M Polgreen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 3.  Clostridioides difficile infection and One Health: an equine perspective.

Authors:  Natasza M R Hain-Saunders; Daniel R Knight; Mieghan Bruce; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.476

4.  Esculin hydrolysis negative and TcdA-only producing strains of Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile from the environment in Western Australia.

Authors:  Nirajmohan Shivaperumal; Daniel R Knight; Korakrit Imwattana; Grace O Androga; Barbara J Chang; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.059

5.  Toxin profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns among toxigenic clinical isolates of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile.

Authors:  Hamid Heidari; Hadi Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie; Ali Amanati; Mohammad Motamedifar; Nahal Hadi; Abdollah Bazargani
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.699

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.