Literature DB >> 29802800

Does mirabegron relieve ureteric stent-related discomfort? A prospective, randomized, multicentre study.

Bum Sik Tae1, Seok Cho2, Byung Jo Jeon1, Hoon Choi1, Jae Young Park1, Sung Yong Cho2, Keon-Cheol Lee2, Jae Hyun Bae1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of 50 mg mirabegron once daily for ureteric stent-related discomfort after ureteroscopic procedures by conducting a multicentre randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients with indwelling ureteric stents after ureteroscopic stone removal or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) were randomized 1:1 to receive either no treatment or mirabegron during the stenting period. At the time of stent removal, the validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), total amount of analgesics administered, and post-voiding residual urine volume were reported for each patient.
RESULTS: Overall, 96 patients were enrolled for analysis. The postoperative USSQ body pain score (21.96 vs 13.96; P = 0.007) and overall pain score (5.58 vs 2.83; P = 0.002) were lower in the mirabegron group than in the control group. The USSQ urinary symptom scores (32.58 vs 27.92; P = 0.582) and USSQ general health score (17.71 vs 14.00; P = 0.281) were also lower in the mirabegron group, but the difference was not significant. Postoperative IPSS total scores and quality-of-life scores were lower in the mirabegron group, but the difference was not significant. The change in IPSS storage symptom score, however, was lower in the mirabegron group than in the control group (3.58 ± 3.58 vs 1.83 ± 4.39; P = 0.035). Post-void residual urine volume did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The use of 50 mg mirabegron once daily has the potential to reduce ureteric stent-related discomfort. Prospective larger-scale, placebo-controlled studies are warranted to further evaluate the beneficial effects of mirabegron on stent-related symptoms.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discomfort; mirabegron; pain; ureteric stent

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802800     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of silicone versus polyurethane ureteral stents: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Nariman Gadzhiev; Dmitry Gorelov; Vigen Malkhasyan; Gagik Akopyan; Revaz Harchelava; Denis Mazurenko; Christina Kosmala; Zhamshid Okhunov; Sergei Petrov
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  The role of mirabegron in relieving double-J stent-related discomfort: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ehab Galal; Mohamed H Abdelhamid; Tarek Fath El-Bab; Amr Abdelhamid
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-02-12

3.  Editorial Comment: The effects of pregaba-lin, solifenacin and their combination the-rapy on ureteral double-J stentrelated symp-toms: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Alexandre Danilovic
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  Complete intraureteral stent placement relieves daytime urinary frequency compared with conventional placement in patients with an indwelling ureteral stent: post-hoc analysis of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Tomoaki Matsuzaki; Takashi Yoshida; Takashi Murota; Kazuyoshi Nakao; Makoto Taguchi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.