Literature DB >> 29802589

Commodification and Human Interests.

Julian J Koplin1,2.   

Abstract

In Markets Without Limits and a series of related papers, Jason Brennan and Peter Jaworski argue that it is morally permissible to buy and sell anything that it is morally permissible to possess and exchange outside of the market. Accordingly, we should (Brennan and Jaworski argue) open markets in "contested commodities" including blood, gametes, surrogacy services, and transplantable organs. This paper clarifies some important aspects of the case for market boundaries and in so doing shows why there are in fact moral limits to the market. I argue that the case for restricting the scope of the market does not (as Brennan and Jaworski assume) turn on the idea that some things are constitutively non-market goods; it turns instead on the idea that treating some things according to market norms would threaten the realization of particular kinds of human interests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commodification; Market boundaries; Market design; Moral dumbfounding; Semiotic arguments

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802589     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-018-9857-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  11 in total

1.  Contested commodities at both ends of life: buying and selling gametes, embryos, and body tissues.

Authors:  S Holland
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2001-09

2.  Selling yourself: Titmuss's argument against a market in blood.

Authors:  David Archard
Journal:  J Ethics       Date:  2002

3.  Burden of Proof in Bioethics.

Authors:  Julian J Koplin; Michael J Selgelid
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Kidney sales and the analogy with dangerous employment.

Authors:  Erik Malmqvist
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2015-06

5.  Kantian condemnation of commerce in organs.

Authors:  Samuel J Kerstein
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2009-06

6.  Risk, regulation, and financial incentives for living kidney donation.

Authors:  Dominique Martin; Sarah White
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market.

Authors:  Simon Rippon
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Reassessing the Likely Harms to Kidney Vendors in Regulated Organ Markets.

Authors:  Luke Semrau
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2017-11-15

9.  Beyond altruistic and commercial contract motherhood: the professional model.

Authors:  Liezl Van Zyl; Ruth Walker
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 10.  Assessing the likely harms to kidney vendors in regulated organ markets.

Authors:  Julian Koplin
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Embedded Journalists or Empirical Critics? The Nature of The "Gaze" in Bioethics.

Authors:  Michael A Ashby; Bronwen Morrell
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 2.  Ethical dilemmas related to living donor liver transplantation in Asia.

Authors:  Lubna Shazi; Zaigham Abbas
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 1.568

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.