Literature DB >> 29802038

Differences in corneo-scleral topographic profile between healthy and keratoconus corneas.

David P Piñero1, Antonio Martínez-Abad2, Roberto Soto-Negro3, Pedro Ruiz-Fortes3, Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí3, Miguel Angel Ariza-Gracia4, Gonzalo Carracedo5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the differences in corneo-scleral topographic profile between healthy and keratoconus eyes, and their potential diagnostic ability for keratoconus detection.
METHODS: Prospective comparative study including 21 keratoconic eyes (11 patients) and 88 healthy eyes (88 patients). In all cases, a complete eye exam was performed including an evaluation of the corneo-scleral profile. The diagnostic ability of corneo-scleral topographic parameters to detect keratoconus was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS: A significant lower inferior tangent angle at limbus (ITA) was found in the keratoconic group compared to the control group (p = 0.024). Regarding sagittal heights, significant differences between groups were found in temporal sagittal height (TSH) for 11 mm (p = 0.040), 12 mm (p = 0.041) and 13 mm corneal chords (p = 0.040), difference between temporal and nasal sagittal heights (T-NSH) for 12 mm (p = 0.025) and 13 mm (p = 0.034), and maximum sagittal height (MaxSH) for 12 mm (p = 0.043), with higher values in keratoconus. In bilateral cases, these differences were not found when comparing with the least severe keratoconus eye. Statistical significance for the ROC curve was only found for ITA (p = 0.025), 12-mm (p = 0.048) and 13-mm TSH (p = 0.042), and 13-mm T-NSH (p = 0.037), with cutoff values associated to limited values of sensitivity and specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: The corneo-scleral profile in keratoconus presents higher levels of asymmetry compared to healthy eyes, especially in eyes with moderate and advanced stages of the disease. The diagnostic accuracy of corneo-scleral topographic data alone for keratoconus detection is limited and must be used in conjunction with other clinical parameters.
Copyright © 2018 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneo-Scleral topography; Keratoconus; Profilometry; Sagittal height

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29802038     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  5 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of the geometric properties of the sclero-conjunctival structure: a review.

Authors:  Laurent Bataille; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Optical Impact of Corneal Clearance in Healthy Eyes Fitted with Scleral Contact Lenses: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  María Villa; Francisco Cavas; David P Piñero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial.

Authors:  Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Eef van der Worp; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control.

Authors:  Laura Remón; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Ana I Amorim-de-Sousa; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Characterization and prediction of the clinical result with a specific model of mini-scleral contact lens in corneas with keratoconus.

Authors:  Abdelkader Sidi Mohamed Hamida; García-Barchín Marta; Ruiz-Fortes Pedro; David P Piñero
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.