Literature DB >> 29801881

Cortical excitability variability: Insights into biological and behavioral characteristics of healthy individuals.

Anna Paula Chagas1, Milena Monteiro1, Vanessa Mazer1, Adriana Baltar1, Déborah Marques1, Maíra Carneiro1, Maria das Graças Rodrigues de Araújo1, Daniele Piscitelli2, Kátia Monte-Silva3.   

Abstract

Motor threshold (MT) measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has diagnostic utility in central nervous system disorders. Its diagnostic sensitivity may be enhanced by identification of non-pathological factors which may influence this measure. The aim of this study was to provide a description of MT variability across physiological and non-pathological behaviour characteristics in a large cohort, including hemispheric asymmetries. In a cross-sectional study, age, handedness, physical activity level, body mass index, gender/menstrual cycle phase, glycemic index and degree of stress were collected from 115 healthy participants. The resting MT of the first dorsal interosseous muscle to TMS was recorded in both hemispheres and served as an indicator of the cortical excitability level. Repeated measures ANOVAs revealed higher MT values in the non-dominant hemisphere, elderly people, stressed individuals and women with amenorrhea. Other biological and behavioral individual characteristics did not influence cortical excitability. Although the degree of interhemispheric difference varied (range: 0.2 to 4.3), depending on biological and behavioral characteristics, this variation was not significant (0.1 ≤ p ≤ 0.8). In conclusion, MT varied considerably between subjects. The difference between the hemisphere excitability that was less influenced by external factors, may be an alternative method of TMS measure to identify pathological changes of cortical excitability.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain dominance; Motor cortex; Neurophysiology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29801881     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Labruna; A Stark-Inbar; A Breska; M Dabit; B Vanderschelden; M A Nitsche; R B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of the motor cortex excitability in stroke: relationship with sensory-motor impairment and injury chronicity.

Authors:  Marina Berenguer-Rocha; Adriana Baltar; Sérgio Rocha; Lívia Shirahige; Rodrigo Brito; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Inter-Individual Variability in tDCS Effects: A Narrative Review on the Contribution of Stable, Variable, and Contextual Factors.

Authors:  Alessandra Vergallito; Sarah Feroldi; Alberto Pisoni; Leonor J Romero Lauro
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  Motor cortical excitability behavior in chronic spinal cord injury neuropathic pain individuals submitted to transcranial direct current stimulation-case reports.

Authors:  Victor Gomide Carvalho; Rodrigo Lanna de Almeida; Raphael Boechat-Barros
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-11-18

5.  Relationship between body mass and clinical response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Davila; Brianna Ely; Ann M Manzardo
Journal:  Ment Illn       Date:  2019-06-11

6.  Baseline Motor Impairment Predicts Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Physical Therapy-Induced Improvement in Individuals with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Adriana Baltar; Daniele Piscitelli; Déborah Marques; Lívia Shirahige; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation neurophysiology of patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megumi Kinjo; Masataka Wada; Shinichiro Nakajima; Sakiko Tsugawa; Tomomi Nakahara; Daniel M Blumberger; Masaru Mimura; Yoshihiro Noda
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 7.723

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.