Importance: Capillary dropout is a hallmark of diabetic retinopathy, but its role in visual loss remains unclear. Objective: To examine how macular vessel density is correlated with visual acuity (VA) in patients younger than 40 years who have type 1 diabetes without macular edema but who have diabetic retinopathy requiring panretinal photocoagulation. Design, Settings, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of VA and optical coherence tomography angiography data collected from consecutive patients during a single visit to Lariboisière Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Paris, France. The cohort included 22 eyes of 22 patients with type 1 diabetes without macular edema but with bilateral rapidly progressive diabetic retinopathy that was treated with panretinal photocoagulation between August 15, 2015, and December 30, 2016. Eyes were classified into 2 groups by VA: normal (logMAR, 0; Snellen equivalent, 20/20) and decreased (logMAR, >0; Snellen equivalent, <20/20). The control group included 12 eyes from age-matched healthy participants with normal vision. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity and mean vessel density in 4 retinal vascular plexuses: the superficial vascular plexus and the deep capillary complex, which comprises the intermediate capillary plexus and the deep capillary plexus. Results: Of the 22 participants, 11 (50%) were men, mean (SD) age was 30 (6) years, and mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c level was 8.9% (1.6%). Of the 22 eyes with diabetic retinopathy, 13 (59%) had normal VA and 9 (41%) had decreased VA (mean [SD]: logMAR, 0.12 [0.04]; Snellen equivalent, 20/25). Mean [SE] vessel density was lower for eyes with diabetic retinopathy and normal VA compared with the control group in the superficial vascular plexus (44.1% [0.9%] vs 49.1% [0.9%]; difference, -5.0% [1.3%]; 95% CI, -7.5% to -2.4%; P < .001), in the deep capillary complex (44.3% [1.2%] vs 50.6% [1.3%]; difference, -6.3% [1.8%]; 95% CI, -9.9% to -2.7%; P = .001), in the intermediate capillary plexus (43.8% [1.2%] vs 49.3% [1.2%]; difference, -5.5% [1.7%]; 95% CI, -9.0% to -2.0%; P = .003), and in the deep capillary plexus (24.5% [1.0%] vs 30.5% [1.0%]; difference, -6.1% [1.4%]; 95% CI, -8.9% to -3.2%; P < .001). Mean vessel density was lower in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and decreased VA compared with eyes with diabetic retinopathy and normal VA; the mean (SE) loss was more pronounced in the deep capillary complex (34.6% [1.5%] vs 44.3% [1.2%]; difference, -9.6% [1.9%]; 95% CI, -13.6% to -5.7%; P < .001), especially in the deep capillary plexus (15.2% [1.2%] vs 24.5% [1.0%]; difference, -9.3% [1.5%]; 95% CI, -12.4% to -6.1%; P < .001), than in the superficial vascular plexus (39.6% [1.1%] vs 44.1% [0.9%]; difference, -4.5% [1.4%]; 95% CI, -7.3% to -1.7%; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that in patients with type 1 diabetes without macular edema but with severe nonproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, decreased VA may be associated with the degree of capillary loss in the deep capillary complex.
Importance: Capillary dropout is a hallmark of diabetic retinopathy, but its role in visual loss remains unclear. Objective: To examine how macular vessel density is correlated with visual acuity (VA) in patients younger than 40 years who have type 1 diabetes without macular edema but who have diabetic retinopathy requiring panretinal photocoagulation. Design, Settings, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of VA and optical coherence tomography angiography data collected from consecutive patients during a single visit to Lariboisière Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Paris, France. The cohort included 22 eyes of 22 patients with type 1 diabetes without macular edema but with bilateral rapidly progressive diabetic retinopathy that was treated with panretinal photocoagulation between August 15, 2015, and December 30, 2016. Eyes were classified into 2 groups by VA: normal (logMAR, 0; Snellen equivalent, 20/20) and decreased (logMAR, >0; Snellen equivalent, <20/20). The control group included 12 eyes from age-matched healthy participants with normal vision. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity and mean vessel density in 4 retinal vascular plexuses: the superficial vascular plexus and the deep capillary complex, which comprises the intermediate capillary plexus and the deep capillary plexus. Results: Of the 22 participants, 11 (50%) were men, mean (SD) age was 30 (6) years, and mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c level was 8.9% (1.6%). Of the 22 eyes with diabetic retinopathy, 13 (59%) had normal VA and 9 (41%) had decreased VA (mean [SD]: logMAR, 0.12 [0.04]; Snellen equivalent, 20/25). Mean [SE] vessel density was lower for eyes with diabetic retinopathy and normal VA compared with the control group in the superficial vascular plexus (44.1% [0.9%] vs 49.1% [0.9%]; difference, -5.0% [1.3%]; 95% CI, -7.5% to -2.4%; P < .001), in the deep capillary complex (44.3% [1.2%] vs 50.6% [1.3%]; difference, -6.3% [1.8%]; 95% CI, -9.9% to -2.7%; P = .001), in the intermediate capillary plexus (43.8% [1.2%] vs 49.3% [1.2%]; difference, -5.5% [1.7%]; 95% CI, -9.0% to -2.0%; P = .003), and in the deep capillary plexus (24.5% [1.0%] vs 30.5% [1.0%]; difference, -6.1% [1.4%]; 95% CI, -8.9% to -3.2%; P < .001). Mean vessel density was lower in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and decreased VA compared with eyes with diabetic retinopathy and normal VA; the mean (SE) loss was more pronounced in the deep capillary complex (34.6% [1.5%] vs 44.3% [1.2%]; difference, -9.6% [1.9%]; 95% CI, -13.6% to -5.7%; P < .001), especially in the deep capillary plexus (15.2% [1.2%] vs 24.5% [1.0%]; difference, -9.3% [1.5%]; 95% CI, -12.4% to -6.1%; P < .001), than in the superficial vascular plexus (39.6% [1.1%] vs 44.1% [0.9%]; difference, -4.5% [1.4%]; 95% CI, -7.3% to -1.7%; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that in patients with type 1 diabetes without macular edema but with severe nonproliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, decreased VA may be associated with the degree of capillary loss in the deep capillary complex.
Authors: Yoshihiko Usui; Peter D Westenskow; Toshihide Kurihara; Edith Aguilar; Susumu Sakimoto; Liliana P Paris; Carli Wittgrove; Daniel Feitelberg; Mollie S H Friedlander; Stacey K Moreno; Michael I Dorrell; Martin Friedlander Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Alice Y Kim; Damien C Rodger; Anoush Shahidzadeh; Zhongdi Chu; Nicole Koulisis; Bruce Burkemper; Xuejuan Jiang; Kathryn L Pepple; Ruikang K Wang; Carmen A Puliafito; Narsing A Rao; Amir H Kashani Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Lala Ceklic; Christian K Brinkmann; Milko E Iliev; Manuel Frey; Simon P Rothenbuehler; Volker Enzmann; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Aditya Gill; Emily D Cole; Eduardo A Novais; Ricardo N Louzada; Talisa de Carlo; Jay S Duker; Nadia K Waheed; Caroline R Baumal; Andre J Witkin Journal: Int J Retina Vitreous Date: 2017-06-19
Authors: Dawn A Sim; Pearse A Keane; Javier Zarranz-Ventura; Simon Fung; Michael B Powner; Elise Platteau; Catey V Bunce; Marcus Fruttiger; Praveen J Patel; Adnan Tufail; Catherine A Egan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jesse J Jung; Daryle Jason G Yu; Anne Zeng; Michael H Chen; Yue Shi; Marco Nassisi; Kenneth M Marion; Srinivas R Sadda; Quan V Hoang Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Emily S Levine; Eric M Moult; Eugenia Custo Greig; Yi Zhao; Varsha Pramil; Isaac Gendelman; Agha Y Alibhai; Caroline R Baumal; Andre J Witkin; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto; Nadia K Waheed Journal: Retina Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Emanuele Crincoli; Donato Colantuono; Zhanlin Zhao; Eric H Souied; Alexandra Miere Journal: Acta Diabetol Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 4.087
Authors: Christopher Sun; Carlo Ladores; Jimmy Hong; Duc Quang Nguyen; Jacqueline Chua; Daniel Ting; Leopold Schmetterer; Tien Yin Wong; Ching-Yu Cheng; Anna C S Tan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.379