Literature DB >> 29800826

Effect of urine contamination on stallion semen freezing ability.

R E Ellerbrock1, J Honorato2, B R Curcio3, J L Stewart1, J A T Souza4, C C Love5, F S Lima1, I F Canisso6.   

Abstract

Urospermia is a common ejaculatory dysfunction of stallions. Current practice suggests that urine contaminated semen should not be used for cryopreservation. The aim of this study was to determine effects of urine contamination on semen freezing. Sixty-five ejaculates from eight stallions were divided into no urine (CONT), low (20% urine, LOW), and high (50% urine, HIGH) samples. Semen was extended with a commercial cooling extender, cushion-centrifuged, resuspended to 200 million/mL in a commercial egg-yolk based extender, and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. A subset of ejaculates (n = 20) were split in two after cushion-centrifugation, and one half of the ejaculate was submitted to a single-layer gradient centrifugation before cryopreservation. Sperm motility parameters were assessed pre- and post-freezing with an automated sperm analyzer. Semen pH, creatinine, and urea concentrations were assessed in raw samples, after urine contamination and after centrifugation and extension. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc. There were significant reductions in total and progressive sperm motilities (i.e., %TM and %PM, respectively) with increasing urine contamination pre-freezing (%TM 67 ± 1.7, %PM 50 ± 2.2, CONT), (%TM 60.3 ± 1.7, % PM 42.5 ± 2.1, LOW), and (%TM 41.3 ± 2, %PM 21.3 ± 1.5, HIGH). Post-thaw motilities for CONT (%TM 54 ± 2.3, %PM 40.8 ± 3.3) and LOW (%TM 51.7 ± 1.8, %PM 36.2 ± 2.1) were not different, but were higher than the HIGH (%TM 31.5 ± 1.2, %PM 17.1 ± 1.0) (p < 0.05). Post-thaw sperm viability was significantly lower in the HIGH (54.7 ± 2.4) than in the CONT (63.8 ± 2.3) or LOW (64.6 ± 3.4) groups. Semen creatinine and urine levels were significantly higher with increasing urine contamination and were significantly decreased after centrifugation and resuspension in freezing extender. Pre-treatment semen pH was significantly lower than semen contaminated with low or high amounts of urine, and pH decreased significantly after centrifugation and resuspension. Gradient centrifugation did not improve %TM in the control group, but it did improve pre-freeze %TM and %PM in the low and high groups and improved significantly post freezing %TM and %PM in the high urine contaminated group. Semen contaminated with a small amount of urine may be suitable for freezing, whereas highly contaminated semen might not be usable. Although urine was mostly removed in this fashion, the initial exposure to high quantities was sufficient to decrease sperm motility pre- and post-freezing, whereas low urine contamination was not as detrimental.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Horses; Semen cryopreservation; Sperm parameters; Urospermia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800826     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  3 in total

1.  Metabolomic profiling reveals correlations between spermiogram parameters and the metabolites present in human spermatozoa and seminal plasma.

Authors:  Kathrin M Engel; Sven Baumann; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Jürgen Schiller; Martin von Bergen; Sonja Grunewald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of In Vitro Interactions of Oviduct Epithelial Cells with Frozen-Thawed Stallion Spermatozoa on Their Motility, Viability and Capacitation Status.

Authors:  Brenda Florencia Gimeno; María Victoria Bariani; Lucía Laiz-Quiroga; Eduardo Martínez-León; Micaela Von-Meyeren; Osvaldo Rey; Adrián Ángel Mutto; Claudia Elena Osycka-Salut
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Cryopreservation of ferret (Mustela putorius furo) sperm collected by rectal massage and electroejaculation: Comparison of a decelerating and an accelerating freezing rate protocol.

Authors:  Adolfo Toledano-Díaz; Cristina Castaño; Rosario Velázquez; Paula Bóveda; Antonio López-Sebastián; Eva Martínez-Nevado; Silvia Villaverde-Morcillo; Milagros C Esteso; Julián Santiago-Moreno
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.