Literature DB >> 29800397

Development of a web-based toolkit to support improvement of care coordination in primary care.

David A Ganz1,2,3, Jenny M Barnard1, Nina Z Y Smith4, Isomi M Miake-Lye1, Deborah M Delevan1, Alissa Simon1, Danielle E Rose1, Susan E Stockdale1,5, Evelyn T Chang1,2, Polly H Noël6,7, Erin P Finley6,7, Martin L Lee1, Donna M Zulman8,9, Kristina M Cordasco1,2, Lisa V Rubenstein1,2,3.   

Abstract

Promising practices for the coordination of chronic care exist, but how to select and share these practices to support quality improvement within a healthcare system is uncertain. This study describes an approach for selecting high-quality tools for an online care coordination toolkit to be used in Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care practices. We evaluated tools in three steps: (1) an initial screening to identify tools relevant to care coordination in VA primary care, (2) a two-clinician expert review process assessing tool characteristics (e.g. frequency of problem addressed, linkage to patients' experience of care, effect on practice workflow, and sustainability with existing resources) and assigning each tool a summary rating, and (3) semi-structured interviews with VA patients and frontline clinicians and staff. Of 300 potentially relevant tools identified by searching online resources, 65, 38, and 18 remained after steps one, two and three, respectively. The 18 tools cover five topics: managing referrals to specialty care, medication management, patient after-visit summary, patient activation materials, agenda setting, patient pre-visit packet, and provider contact information for patients. The final toolkit provides access to the 18 tools, as well as detailed information about tools' expected benefits, and resources required for tool implementation. Future care coordination efforts can benefit from systematically reviewing available tools to identify those that are high quality and relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800397     DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

1.  Patient experience of health care system hassles: Dual-system vs single-system users.

Authors:  Polly H Noël; Jenny M Barnard; Frances M Barry; Alissa Simon; Martin L Lee; Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa; Neetu Chawla; Danielle E Rose; Susan E Stockdale; Erin P Finley; Lauren S Penney; David A Ganz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Staff Perspectives on Primary Care Teams as De Facto "Hubs" for Care Coordination in VA: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa; Purnima Bharath; David A Ganz; Polly H Noël; Neetu Chawla; Jenny M Barnard; Danielle E Rose; Susan E Stockdale; Alissa Simon; Erin P Finley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Coordination Toolkit and Coaching Project: Cluster-Randomized Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Patient Experience of Care Coordination.

Authors:  Polly H Noël; Jenny M Barnard; Mei Leng; Lauren S Penney; Purnima S Bharath; Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa; Neetu Chawla; Danielle E Rose; Susan E Stockdale; Alissa Simon; Martin L Lee; Erin P Finley; Lisa V Rubenstein; David A Ganz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Sustaining implementation facilitation: a model for facilitator resilience.

Authors:  Tanya T Olmos-Ochoa; David A Ganz; Jenny M Barnard; Lauren Penney; Erin P Finley; Alison B Hamilton; Neetu Chawla
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Assessing fidelity to evidence-based quality improvement as an implementation strategy for patient-centered medical home transformation in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Susan E Stockdale; Alison B Hamilton; Alicia A Bergman; Danielle E Rose; Karleen F Giannitrapani; Timothy R Dresselhaus; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.