Objective: To examine individual differences in pediatric cancer survivors' psychosocial adjustment and test the psychosocial predictors, assessed 2-3 years earlier, of those differences. Method: Pediatric cancer survivors (n = 209, aged 8-17 years at baseline) and their parents were followed for 4 years. They provided reports of survivors' psychosocial adjustment at 3 years post-baseline, and latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups of survivors who differed on those reports. Multinomial logistic regression was used to predict group membership from self- and parent-reported psychosocial factors at baseline (child adjustment, disposition, and parental functioning) and at 1 year post-baseline (child social relations). Results: The LPA revealed a 3-class model as the best fit: a "Resilient" group (65%), characterized by good psychosocial adjustment; a "Self-Reported At-Risk" group (23%), characterized by subclinical elevations in self-reported internalizing and attention problems; and a "Parent-Reported At-Risk" group (12%), characterized by subclinical elevations in parent-reported internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems and in self-reported attention problems. Several psychosocial predictors, including child posttraumatic stress, affectivity, and connectedness to school, as well as parental distress and overprotection, differentiated the Resilient group from the other groups, in expected directions. Conclusions: The majority of pediatric cancer survivors exhibit enduring resilience. The protective factors identified for them-including positive affectivity and strong connectedness to school-may inform targeted prevention strategies for the minority of survivors who are at risk for maladjustment.
Objective: To examine individual differences in pediatric cancer survivors' psychosocial adjustment and test the psychosocial predictors, assessed 2-3 years earlier, of those differences. Method: Pediatric cancer survivors (n = 209, aged 8-17 years at baseline) and their parents were followed for 4 years. They provided reports of survivors' psychosocial adjustment at 3 years post-baseline, and latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify subgroups of survivors who differed on those reports. Multinomial logistic regression was used to predict group membership from self- and parent-reported psychosocial factors at baseline (child adjustment, disposition, and parental functioning) and at 1 year post-baseline (child social relations). Results: The LPA revealed a 3-class model as the best fit: a "Resilient" group (65%), characterized by good psychosocial adjustment; a "Self-Reported At-Risk" group (23%), characterized by subclinical elevations in self-reported internalizing and attention problems; and a "Parent-Reported At-Risk" group (12%), characterized by subclinical elevations in parent-reported internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems and in self-reported attention problems. Several psychosocial predictors, including childposttraumatic stress, affectivity, and connectedness to school, as well as parental distress and overprotection, differentiated the Resilient group from the other groups, in expected directions. Conclusions: The majority of pediatric cancer survivors exhibit enduring resilience. The protective factors identified for them-including positive affectivity and strong connectedness to school-may inform targeted prevention strategies for the minority of survivors who are at risk for maladjustment.
Authors: Lisa S Kahalley; Stephanie J Wilson; Vida L Tyc; Heather M Conklin; Melissa M Hudson; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Heather H Stancel; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Tara M Brinkman; Chenghong Li; Kathryn Vannatta; Jordan G Marchak; Jin-Shei Lai; Pinki K Prasad; Cara Kimberg; Stefanie Vuotto; Chongzhi Di; Deokumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L K Zeltzer; E Chen; R Weiss; M D Guo; L L Robison; A T Meadows; J L Mills; H S Nicholson; J Byrne Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Birmaher; D A Brent; L Chiappetta; J Bridge; S Monga; M Baugher Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Marina Servitzoglou; Danai Papadatou; Ioannis Tsiantis; Helen Vasilatou-Kosmidis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-06-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Peter C Trask; Amber G Paterson; Christine L Trask; Cristina B Bares; JoAnn Birt; Cathy Maan Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Amanda L Thompson; Heather L Christiansen; Megan Elam; Jennifer Hoag; Mary Kay Irwin; Maryland Pao; Megan Voll; Robert B Noll; Katherine Patterson Kelly Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: T M Brinkman; L Zhu; L K Zeltzer; C J Recklitis; C Kimberg; N Zhang; A C Muriel; M Stovall; D K Srivastava; L L Robison; K R Krull Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Abby R Rosenberg; Chuan Zhou; Miranda C Bradford; John M Salsman; Katie Sexton; Alison O'Daffer; Joyce P Yi-Frazier Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-11-01