Literature DB >> 29800270

Multimodal analgesia using intrathecal diamorphine, and paravertebral and rectus sheath catheters are as effective as thoracic epidural for analgesia post-open two-phase esophagectomy within an enhanced recovery program.

C L Donohoe1, A W Phillips1, E Flynn2, C Donnison2, C L Taylor1, R C F Sinclair2, D Saunders2, A Immanuel1, S M Griffin1.   

Abstract

Thoracic epidural (TE) analgesia has been the standard of care for transthoracic esophagectomy patients since the 1990s. Multimodal anesthesia using intrathecal diamorphine, local anesthetic infusion catheters (LAC) into the paravertebral space and rectus sheaths and intravenous opioid postoperatively represent an alternative option for postoperative analgesia. While TE can provide excellent pain control, it may inhibit early postoperative recovery by causing hypotension and reducing mobilization. The aim of this study is to determine whether multimodal analgesia with LAC was effective with respect to adequate pain management, and compare its impact on hypotension and mobility. Patients receiving multimodal LAC analgesia were matched using propensity score matching to patients undergoing two-phase trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a TE over a two-year period (from January 2015 to December 2016). Postoperative endpoints that had been evaluated prospectively, including pain scores on movement and at rest, inotrope or vasoconstrictor requirements, and hypotension (systolic BP < 90 mmHg), were compared between cohorts. Out of 14 patients (13 male) that received LAC were matched to a cohort of 14 patients on age, sex, and comorbidity. Mean and maximum pain scores at rest and movement on postoperative days 0 to 3 were equivalent between the groups. In both cohorts, 50% of patients had a pain score of more than 7 on at least one occasion. Fewer patients in the LAC group required vasoconstrictor infusion (LAC: 36% vs. TE: 57%, P = 0.256) to maintain blood pressure or had episodes of hypotension (LAC: 43% vs. TE: 79%, P = 0.05). The LAC group was more able to ambulate on the first postoperative day (LAC: 64% vs. TE: 43%, P = 0.14) but these differences were not statistically significant. Within the epidural cohort, three patients had interruption of epidural due to dislodgement or failure of block compared to no disruption in the multimodal local anesthesia catheters group (P = 0.05). Therefore, multimodal anesthesia using spinal diamorphine with combined paravertebral and rectus sheath local anesthetic catheters appears to provide comparable pain relief post two-phase esophagectomy and may provide more reliable and safe analgesia than the current standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800270     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  5 in total

1.  Evolution of Esophagectomy for Cancer Over 30 Years: Changes in Presentation, Management and Outcomes.

Authors:  S Michael Griffin; Rhys Jones; Sivesh Kathir Kamarajah; Maziar Navidi; Shajahan Wahed; Arul Immanuel; Nick Hayes; Alexander W Phillips
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint.

Authors:  Cristian Deana; Luigi Vetrugno; Elena Bignami; Flavio Bassi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  A comparison between thoracic epidural analgesia and rectus sheath catheter analgesia after open midline major abdominal surgery: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Anton Krige; Sarah G Brearley; Céu Mateus; Gordon L Carlson; Steven Lane
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Combined Programmed Intermittent Bolus Infusion With Continuous Infusion for the Thoracic Paravertebral Block in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, and Double-blinded Study.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Xinyi Huang; Yulong Cui; Yangfan Xiao; Xu Zhao; Junmei Xu
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.423

5.  Paravertebral catheter versus EPidural analgesia in Minimally invasive Esophageal resectioN: a randomized controlled multicenter trial (PEPMEN trial).

Authors:  B F Kingma; W J Eshuis; E M de Groot; M L Feenstra; J P Ruurda; S S Gisbertz; W Ten Hoope; M Marsman; J Hermanides; M W Hollmann; C J Kalkman; M D P Luyer; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; H J Scholten; M Buise; M J van Det; E A Kouwenhoven; F van der Meer; G W J Frederix; E Cheong; K Al Naimi; M I van Berge Henegouwen; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.