Purpose: Correlates of receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancies may provide insights into why language development in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) deviates from typical language development and ultimately improve intervention outcomes. Method: We indexed receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancies of 65 initially preverbal children with ASD (20-48 months) to a comparison sample from the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Wordbank (Frank, Braginsky, Yurovsky, & Marchman, 2017) to quantify typicality. We then tested whether attention toward a speaker and oral motor performance predict typicality of the discrepancy 8 months later. Results: Attention toward a speaker correlated positively with receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancy typicality. Imitative and nonimitative oral motor performance were not significant predictors of vocabulary size discrepancy typicality. Secondary analyses indicated that midpoint receptive vocabulary size mediated the association between initial attention toward a speaker and end point receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancy typicality. Conclusions: Findings support the hypothesis that variation in attention toward a speaker might partially explain receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancy magnitude in children with ASD. Results are consistent with an input-processing deficit explanation of language impairment in this clinical population. Future studies should test whether attention toward a speaker is malleable and causally related to receptive-expressive discrepancies in children with ASD.
Purpose: Correlates of receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancies may provide insights into why language development in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) deviates from typical language development and ultimately improve intervention outcomes. Method: We indexed receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancies of 65 initially preverbal children with ASD (20-48 months) to a comparison sample from the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories Wordbank (Frank, Braginsky, Yurovsky, & Marchman, 2017) to quantify typicality. We then tested whether attention toward a speaker and oral motor performance predict typicality of the discrepancy 8 months later. Results: Attention toward a speaker correlated positively with receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancy typicality. Imitative and nonimitative oral motor performance were not significant predictors of vocabulary size discrepancy typicality. Secondary analyses indicated that midpoint receptive vocabulary size mediated the association between initial attention toward a speaker and end point receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancy typicality. Conclusions: Findings support the hypothesis that variation in attention toward a speaker might partially explain receptive-expressive vocabulary size discrepancy magnitude in children with ASD. Results are consistent with an input-processing deficit explanation of language impairment in this clinical population. Future studies should test whether attention toward a speaker is malleable and causally related to receptive-expressive discrepancies in children with ASD.
Authors: M K DeMeyer; G D Alpern; S Barton; W E DeMyer; D W Churchill; J N Hingtgen; C Q Bryson; W Pontius; C Kimberlin Journal: J Autism Child Schizophr Date: 1972 Jul-Sep
Authors: Matthew K Belmonte; Tanushree Saxena-Chandhok; Ruth Cherian; Reema Muneer; Lisa George; Prathibha Karanth Journal: Front Integr Neurosci Date: 2013-07-01
Authors: Thomas W Frazier; Eric W Klingemier; Christa J Anderson; Grace W Gengoux; Eric A Youngstrom; Antonio Y Hardan Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2021-02-08
Authors: Micheal Sandbank; Kristen Bottema-Beutel; Shannon Crowley; Margaret Cassidy; Jacob I Feldman; Marcos Canihuante; Tiffany Woynaroski Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Debra B Reinhartsen; Emil Cornea; Margaret DeRamus; Angelia B Waitt; Rebecca Edmondson Pretzel; Rebecca C Knickmeyer; Marsha L Davenport; John H Gilmore; Stephen R Hooper Journal: J Neurodev Disord Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 4.025