Literature DB >> 29800030

Use and Effectiveness of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Men.

Sriram Venigalla1, Ruben Carmona1,2, David M Guttmann1, Varsha Jain1, Gary M Freedman1, Amy S Clark3, Jacob E Shabason1.   

Abstract

Importance: Although adjuvant endocrine therapy confers a survival benefit among females with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, the effectiveness of this treatment among males with HR-positive breast cancer has not been rigorously investigated. Objective: To investigate trends, patterns of use, and effectiveness of adjuvant endocrine therapy among men with HR-positive breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study identified patients in the National Cancer Database with breast cancer who had received treatment from 2004 through 2014. Inclusion criteria for the primary study cohort were males at least 18 years old with nonmetastatic HR-positive invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery with or without adjuvant endocrine therapy. A cohort of female patients was also identified using the same inclusion criteria for comparative analyses by sex. Data analysis was conducted from October 1, 2017, to December 15, 2017. Exposures: Receipt of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patterns of adjuvant endocrine therapy use were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Association between adjuvant endocrine therapy use and overall survival was assessed using propensity score-weighted multivariable Cox regression models.
Results: The primary study cohort comprised 10 173 men with HR-positive breast cancer (mean [interquartile range] age, 66 [57-75] years). The comparative cohort comprised 961 676 women with HR-positive breast cancer (mean [interquartile range] age, 62 [52-72] years). The median follow-up for the male cohort was 49.6 months (range, 0.1-142.5 months). Men presented more frequently than women with HR-positive disease (94.0% vs 84.3%, P < .001). However, eligible men were less likely than women to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (67.3% vs 79.0%; OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.58-0.63; P < .001). Treatment at academic facilities (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25; P = .02) and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 2.55-3.15; P < .001) or chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34; P < .001) were statistically significantly associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy use in men. A propensity score-weighted analysis indicated that relative to no use, adjuvant endocrine therapy use in men was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: There is a sex disparate underuse of adjuvant endocrine therapy among men with HR-positive breast cancer despite the use of this treatment being associated with improved overall survival. Further research and interventions may be warranted to bridge gaps in care in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29800030      PMCID: PMC6233775          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  14 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca A Levine; Bhani Chawla; Shelli Bergeron; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Endocrine therapy for male breast cancer: rates of toxicity and adherence.

Authors:  H Visram; F Kanji; S F Dent
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955-1996.

Authors:  P E Goss; C Reid; M Pintilie; R Lim; N Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Jo Anne Zujewski; Leah Kamin; Sharon Giordano; Susan Domchek; William F Anderson; John M S Bartlett; Karen Gelmon; Zeina Nahleh; Jonas Bergh; Bruno Cutuli; Giancarlo Pruneri; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Julie Gralow; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen compared to aromatase inhibitors for 257 male breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Holm Eggemann; Atanas Ignatov; Bobbie J Smith; Udo Altmann; Gunter von Minckwitz; Freidrich W Röhl; Mark Jahn; Serban-Dan Costa
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Multidisciplinary clinic care improves adherence to best practice in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Stephen L Kelly; James E Jackson; Brigid E Hickey; Frank G Szallasi; Craig A Bond
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Adjuvant tamoxifen for male breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  G Ribeiro; R Swindell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Exclusion of Men from Randomized Phase III Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kelsey L Corrigan; Walker Mainwaring; Austin B Miller; Timothy A Lin; Amit Jethanandani; Andres F Espinoza; Matt Piotrowski; C David Fuller; Michael C Stauder; Simona F Shaitelman; George H Perkins; Wendy A Woodward; Sharon H Giordano; Benjamin D Smith; Ethan B Ludmir
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-04-28

2.  Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and black race: does sex matter?

Authors:  Mariam F Eskander; Yaming Li; Oindrila Bhattacharyya; Allan Tsung; Bridget A Oppong; Ahmad Hamad; Margaret Gatti-Mays; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.624

3.  Adjuvant radiation therapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer: a propensity-matched SEER analysis.

Authors:  Nisha Wu; Qiao Tan; Xiaohan Su; Yewei Yuan; Lingmi Hou; Junyan Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.340

4.  Incidence and survival outcomes of early male breast cancer: a population-based comparison with early female breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Kai Chen; Yaping Yang; Luyuan Tan; Lili Chen; Liling Zhu; Fengxi Su; Xue Liu; Shunrong Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

5.  Sex-Based Heterogeneity in the Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Yiqun Han; Jiayu Wang; Zijing Wang; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis for male breast cancer compared to female breast cancer.

Authors:  Nan Yao; Wenzai Shi; Tong Liu; Sarah Tan Siyin; Weiqi Wang; Ning Duan; Guoshuai Xu; Jun Qu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.