Sarah L McGuinness1,2, S Fiona Barker1, Joanne O'Toole1, Allen C Cheng1,2, Andrew B Forbes1, Martha Sinclair1, Karin Leder1,3. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) disproportionately affect those living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to determine whether hygiene interventions delivered in childcare, school or domestic settings in LMICs effectively prevent or reduce ARIs. METHODS: We registered our systematic review with PROSPERO (CRD42017058239) and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception to 17 October 2017 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of hygiene interventions on ARI morbidity in adults and children in community-based settings in LMICs. We stratified data into childcare, school and domestic settings and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess evidence quality. RESULTS: We identified 14 cluster RCTs evaluating hand-hygiene interventions in LMICs with considerable heterogeneity in setting, size, intervention delivery and duration. We found reduced ARI-related absenteeism and illness in childcare settings (low- to moderate-quality evidence). In school settings, we found reduced ARI-related absenteeism and laboratory-confirmed influenza (moderate- to high-quality evidence), but no reduction in ARI illness (low-quality evidence). In domestic settings, we found reduced ARI illness and pneumonia amongst children in urban settlements (high-quality evidence) but not in rural settlements (low-quality evidence), and no effect on secondary transmission of influenza in households (moderate-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that hand-hygiene interventions delivered in childcare, school and domestic settings can reduce ARI morbidity, but effectiveness varies according to setting, intervention target and intervention compliance. Further studies are needed to develop, deliver and evaluate targeted and sustainable hygiene interventions in LMICs.
OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) disproportionately affect those living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to determine whether hygiene interventions delivered in childcare, school or domestic settings in LMICs effectively prevent or reduce ARIs. METHODS: We registered our systematic review with PROSPERO (CRD42017058239) and searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception to 17 October 2017 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of hygiene interventions on ARI morbidity in adults and children in community-based settings in LMICs. We stratified data into childcare, school and domestic settings and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess evidence quality. RESULTS: We identified 14 cluster RCTs evaluating hand-hygiene interventions in LMICs with considerable heterogeneity in setting, size, intervention delivery and duration. We found reduced ARI-related absenteeism and illness in childcare settings (low- to moderate-quality evidence). In school settings, we found reduced ARI-related absenteeism and laboratory-confirmed influenza (moderate- to high-quality evidence), but no reduction in ARI illness (low-quality evidence). In domestic settings, we found reduced ARI illness and pneumonia amongst children in urban settlements (high-quality evidence) but not in rural settlements (low-quality evidence), and no effect on secondary transmission of influenza in households (moderate-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that hand-hygiene interventions delivered in childcare, school and domestic settings can reduce ARI morbidity, but effectiveness varies according to setting, intervention target and intervention compliance. Further studies are needed to develop, deliver and evaluate targeted and sustainable hygiene interventions in LMICs.
Keywords:
acute respiratory infections; behaviour change; changement de comportement; handwashing; hygiene; hygiène; infections respiratoires aiguës; lavage des mains; low- and middle-income countries; pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire
Authors: Tahmina Parvin; Elizabeth D Thomas; Kelly Endres; Daniel Leung; Md Sazzadul Islam Bhuyian; Ismat Minhaj Uddin; Md Tasdik Hasan; Fatema Zohura; Jahed Masud; Shirajum Monira; Jamie Perin; Munirul Alam; A S G Faruque; Christine Marie George Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Christine Marie George; Jamie Perin; Tahmina Parvin; Sazzadul Bhuyian; Elizabeth D Thomas; Shirajum Monira; Fatema Zohura; Tasdik Hasan; David Sack; Munirul Alam Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.707
Authors: Ian Ross; Joanna Esteves Mills; Tom Slaymaker; Richard Johnston; Guy Hutton; Robert Dreibelbis; Maggie Montgomery Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-12
Authors: Jason Abaluck; Laura H Kwong; Ashley Styczynski; Stephen P Luby; Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak; Ashraful Haque; Md Alamgir Kabir; Ellen Bates-Jefferys; Emily Crawford; Jade Benjamin-Chung; Shabib Raihan; Shadman Rahman; Salim Benhachmi; Neeti Zaman Bintee; Peter J Winch; Maqsud Hossain; Hasan Mahmud Reza; Abdullah All Jaber; Shawkee Gulshan Momen; Aura Rahman; Faika Laz Banti; Tahrima Saiha Huq Journal: Science Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 63.714
Authors: Jenna Swarthout; Pavani K Ram; Charles D Arnold; Holly N Dentz; Benjamin F Arnold; Stephen Kalungu; Audrie Lin; Sammy M Njenga; Christine P Stewart; John M Colford; Clair Null; Amy J Pickering Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Denise Duijster; Helen Buxton; Habib Benzian; Jed Dimaisip-Nabuab; Bella Monse; Catherine Volgenant; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.380