Literature DB >> 29799314

Risk factors for anterior bone loss in cervical disc arthroplasty.

David Christopher Kieser1, Derek Thomas Cawley2, Takashi Fujishiro2, Simon Mazas2, Louis Boissière2, Ibrahim Obeid2, Vincent Pointillart2, Jean-Marc Vital2, Olivier Gille2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors of anterior bone loss (ABL) in cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and the subsequent effect of this phenomenon. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective radiological review of 185 patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up after CDA (using Bryan, Discocerv, Mobi-C, or Baguera C). Postoperative radiographs were examined and compared to the initial postoperative films to determine the percentage of ABL. The relationship of ABL to potential risk factors was analyzed. RESULTS Complete radiological assessment was available in 145 patients with 193 CDRs and 383 endplates (average age 45 years, range 25-65 years, 54% women). ABL was identified in 63.7% of CDRs (48.7% mild, 11.9% moderate, 3.1% severe). Age (p = 0.770), sex (p = 0.200), postoperative alignment (p = 0.330), midflexion point (p = 0.509), maximal flexion (p = 0.080), and extension (p = 0.717) did not relate to ABL. There was no significant difference in the rate of severe ABL between implants. Multilevel surgery conferred an increased risk of any and severe ABL (p = 0.013 for both). The upper endplate, defined as superior to the CDA, was more commonly involved (p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference whether the endplate was between or not between implants (p = 0.226). The development of ABL did not affect the long-term range of movement (ROM) of the CDA, but did increase the overall risk of autofusion. ABL was not associated with pain or functional deficits. No patients required a reoperation or revision of their implant during the course of this study, and there were no cases of progressive ABL beyond the first year. CONCLUSIONS ABL is common in all implant types assessed, although most is mild. Age, sex, postoperative alignment, ROM, and midflexion point do not relate to this phenomenon. However, the greater the number of levels operated, the higher the risk of developing ABL. The development of ABL has no long-term effect on the mechanical functioning of the disc or necessity for revision surgery, although it may increase the rate of autofusion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABL = anterior bone loss; ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ALL = anterior longitudinal ligament; AP = anteroposterior; CDA = cervical disc arthroplasty; HO = heterotrophic ossification; NDI = neck disability index; ROM = range of movement; VAS = visual analog scale; avascular necrosis; bone loss; cervical disc replacement; disc arthroplasty; osteolysis; stress shielding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29799314     DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE171018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  7 in total

Review 1.  The lexicon for periprosthetic bone loss versus osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jenna M Wahbeh; Sang-Hyun Park; Patricia Campbell; Edward Ebramzadeh; Sophia N Sangiorgio
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ian J Wellington; Cameron Kia; Ergin Coskun; Barrett B Torre; Christopher L Antonacci; Michael R Mancini; John P Connors; Sean M Esmende; Heeren S Makanji
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Association between anterior bone loss and anterior heterotopic ossification in hybrid surgery.

Authors:  Junbo He; Hao Liu; Tingkui Wu; Chen Ding; Kangkang Huang; Ying Hong; Beiyu Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Anterior bone loss after cervical disc replacement: A systematic review.

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu; Ying Hong; Bei-Yu Wang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Effects of endplate coverage and intervertebral height change on heterotopic ossification following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Shen; Yi Yang; Hao Liu; Xin Rong; Chen Ding; Yang Meng; Bei-Yu Wang; Ying Hong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Multilevel cervical arthroplasty-clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Rui Reinas; Djamel Kitumba; Leopoldina Pereira; António M Baptista; Óscar L Alves
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-03

7.  Implant complications after one-level or two-level cervical disc arthroplasty: A retrospective single-centre study of 105 patients.

Authors:  Xin-Jie Liang; Wei-Yang Zhong; Ke Tang; Zheng-Xue Quan; Xiao-Ji Luo; Dian-Ming Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.