Literature DB >> 29798953

Comparative pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar to reference bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Prasad Dattatray Apsangikar1, Sunil Ramdev Chaudhry1, Manoj Murlidhar Naik1, Shashank Babarao Deoghare2, Jamila Joseph2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish clinical biosimilarity of BevaciRelbevacizumab biosimilar (study bevacizumab) with the reference innovator bevacizumab in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients with mCRC were enrolled across 20 centers and randomized to receive study and reference bevacizumab in this Phase III clinical study. Of these, 116 patients were administered bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan regimen. The primary endpoint of the study was objective response rate (ORR) at week 25, and the secondary endpoints assessed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and assessment of pharmacokinetics and safety along with immunogenicity in both treatment arms.
RESULTS: The ORR was 60.53% in study bevacizumab and 66.67% in reference arm. The proportions of subjects showing CR and PR were comparable in both the arms. The median PFS at 1 year was 3.83 months in test arm and 4.6 months in reference arm. The mean OS was 10.91 months in test arm and 14.68 months in reference arm. The difference in ORR, median PFS, and OS was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The median Tmaxwas 6.00 h in both the arms. The median t½ was 330.63 h and 226.14 h, respectively, for test and reference bevacizumab. The adverse event profile of both products was in line with the known profile of bevacizumab.
CONCLUSION: The study biosimilar bevacizumab was found to be noninferior and clinically biosimilar to the reference bevacizumab, thereby meeting an unmet medical alternative need in mCRC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bevacizumab; colorectal; comparative; metastatic colorectal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29798953     DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_394_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Cancer        ISSN: 0019-509X            Impact factor:   1.224


  4 in total

1.  Characteristics of Clinical Trials Evaluating Biosimilars in the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doni Bloomfield; Elvira D'Andrea; Sarosh Nagar; Aaron Kesselheim
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 33.006

2.  Safety and efficacy of bevacizumab biosimilar in recurrent/ progressive glioblastoma.

Authors:  Gunjesh Kumar; Hollis DSouza; Nandini Menon; Sujay Srinivas; Dilip Harindran Vallathol; Mounika Boppana; Annu Rajpurohit; Abhishek Mahajan; Amit Janu; Abhishek Chatterjee; Rahul Krishnatry; Tejpal Gupta; Rakesh Jalali; Vijay M Patil
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-01-13

3.  A phase 1 randomized study compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of HLX04 to reference bevacizumab sourced from the United States, the European Union, and China in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Zhu; Hongjie Qian; Jixuan Sun; Min Wu; Chen Yu; Yanhua Ding; Xiaodi Zhang; Katherine Chai; Xiaojiao Li
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Is there an efficacy-effectiveness gap between randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Shihui Fu; Rui Meng; Yu Ren; Ye Shang; Lei Tian
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.