Literature DB >> 29798732

Transition from blastomere to trophectoderm biopsy: comparing two preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies strategies.

Lluc Coll1, Mònica Parriego2, Montserrat Boada2, Marta Devesa2, Gemma Arroyo2, Ignacio Rodríguez2, Bonaventura Coroleu2, Francesca Vidal3, Anna Veiga2.   

Abstract

SummaryShortly after the implementation of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) techniques for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), the discussion about the transition from day 3 to blastocyst stage biopsy was initiated. Trophectoderm biopsy with CCS is meant to overcome the limitations of cleavage-stage biopsy and single-cell analysis. The aim of this study was to assess the results obtained in our PGT-A programme after the implementation of this new strategy. Comparisons between the results obtained in 179 PGT-A cycles with day 3 biopsy (D+3) and fresh embryo transfer, and 204 cycles with trophectoderm biopsy and deferred (frozen-thawed) embryo transfer were established. Fewer embryos were biopsied and a higher euploidy rate was observed in the trophectoderm biopsy group. No differences in implantation (50.3% vs. 61.4%) and clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (56.1% vs. 65.3%) were found. Although the mean number of euploid embryos per cycle did not differ between groups (1.5 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8), the final number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer per cycle was significantly higher in the trophectoderm biopsy group (1.1 ± 1.3 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8). This factor led to an increased cumulative live birth rate in this last group (34.1% vs. 44.6%). Although both strategies can offer good results, trophectoderm biopsy offers a more robust diagnosis and the intervention is less harmful for the embryos so more euploid blastocysts are finally available for transfer and/or vitrification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro fertilization; Aneuploidy; Biopsy; Blastocyst; Cleavage stage; Live birth rate; Preimplantation genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29798732     DOI: 10.1017/S0967199418000084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zygote        ISSN: 0967-1994            Impact factor:   1.442


  4 in total

Review 1.  Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review.

Authors:  Naoki Aoyama; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-26

2.  Cryopreservation of euploid blastocysts obtained after fertilization of in vitro matured ovarian tissue oocytes: a case report.

Authors:  Anastasia Kirillova; Evgeniya Kovalskaya; Olga Brovkina; Aleksey Ekimov; Ekaterina Bunyaeva; Marat Gordiev; Nona Mishieva; Tatiana Nazarenko; Aydar Abubakirov; Gennady Sukikh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Preimplantation Genetic Screening and The Success Rate of In Vitro Fertilization: A Three-Years Study on Iranian Population.

Authors:  Mehdi Totonchi; Babak Babaabasi; Hadi Najafi; Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi; Lila Karimian; Navid Almadani; Anahita Mohseni Meybodi; Morteza Kimiai; Mehri Mashayekhi; Tahereh Madani; Hamid Gourabi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Application of Two Blastocyst Biopsy Strategies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing Treatment and Assessment of Their Effects.

Authors:  Han Yang; Dandan Yang; Qi Zhu; Kaijuan Wang; Chao Zhang; Beili Chen; Weiwei Zou; Yan Hao; Ding Ding; Zhaojuan Yu; Dongmei Ji; Dawei Chen; Yunxia Cao; Huijuan Zou; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.555

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.