Christopher S Bibbs1,2, Maia Tsikolia3, Jeffrey R Bloomquist3, Ulrich R Bernier4, Rui-De Xue2, Phillip E Kaufman1. 1. Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2. Anastasia Mosquito Control District, St Augustine, FL, USA. 3. Entomology and Nematology Department, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 4. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mosquito mortality has been documented in numerous studies of spatial repellents but the concentration-dependent toxicity of spatial repellent vapors has not been documented. To address this issue, prallethrin, flumethrin, metofluthrin, transfluthrin, and meperfluthrin were selected for comparative study against Aedes albopictus (Skuse), Ae. aegypti (L.), Culex quinquefasciatus Say, and Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say. Mosquito were exposed to vapors of each chemical for 2, 4, and 24 h with mortality recorded at each time point. A second experiment involved exposing mosquitoes to vapors for 2 h, then transferring them to untreated holding containers and held for 24 h. For these mosquitoes, readings were only taken after 24 h to allow for metabolic detoxification and recovery. RESULTS: LC50 and LC90 data indicated that transfluthrin and meperfluthrin had the greatest toxicity across all species, followed by metofluthrin, prallethrin, and flumethrin. CONCLUSION: Our findings, through the direct comparison of these compounds, suggest that transfluthrin, meperfluthrin, and metofluthrin be considered for further development. The vapor toxicity for the aforementioned compounds significantly exceeds prallethrin, which is currently market available as an adulticidal active ingredient in public health pest control.
BACKGROUND: Mosquito mortality has been documented in numerous studies of spatial repellents but the concentration-dependent toxicity of spatial repellent vapors has not been documented. To address this issue, prallethrin, flumethrin, metofluthrin, transfluthrin, and meperfluthrin were selected for comparative study against Aedes albopictus (Skuse), Ae. aegypti (L.), Culex quinquefasciatus Say, and Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say. Mosquito were exposed to vapors of each chemical for 2, 4, and 24 h with mortality recorded at each time point. A second experiment involved exposing mosquitoes to vapors for 2 h, then transferring them to untreated holding containers and held for 24 h. For these mosquitoes, readings were only taken after 24 h to allow for metabolic detoxification and recovery. RESULTS: LC50 and LC90 data indicated that transfluthrin and meperfluthrin had the greatest toxicity across all species, followed by metofluthrin, prallethrin, and flumethrin. CONCLUSION: Our findings, through the direct comparison of these compounds, suggest that transfluthrin, meperfluthrin, and metofluthrin be considered for further development. The vapor toxicity for the aforementioned compounds significantly exceeds prallethrin, which is currently market available as an adulticidal active ingredient in public health pest control.
Authors: Gregor J Devine; Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec; Wilbert Bibiano-Marín; Norma Pavia-Ruz; Azael Che-Mendoza; Anuar Medina-Barreiro; Josue Villegas; Gabriela Gonzalez-Olvera; Mike W Dunbar; Oselyne Ong; Scott A Ritchie; Thomas S Churcher; Oscar D Kirstein; Pablo Manrique-Saide Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2021-01-26
Authors: Margaret Mendi Njoroge; Ulrike Fillinger; Adam Saddler; Sarah Moore; Willem Takken; Joop J A van Loon; Alexandra Hiscox Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Ingeborg H Cuba; Gary R Richoux; Edmund J Norris; Ulrich R Bernier; Kenneth J Linthicum; Jeffrey R Bloomquist Journal: Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis Date: 2021-11-18
Authors: Olivia Zarella; Uche Ekwomadu; Yamila Romer; Oscar D Kirstein; Azael Che-Mendoza; Gabriela González-Olvera; Pablo Manrique-Saide; Gregor Devine; Gonzalo M Vazquez-Prokopec Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 3.752