J L Isaksen1,2, C Graff2, C Ellervik3, J S Jensen3,4, P Rossing5,6,7, J K Kanters1, M T Jensen4,5,8. 1. Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 3. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Cardiology S, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark. 6. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 8. The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate depolarization and repolarization durations in people with Type 1 diabetes, including the relationship to age. METHODS: 855 persons with Type 1 diabetes without known heart disease were included and matched with 1710 participants from a general population study. Clinical examinations, questionnaires and biochemistry were assessed. A 10-second 12-lead ECG was performed and analysed digitally. RESULTS: QTc was longer in people with Type 1 diabetes compared to controls (414±16 vs. 411±19 ms, P <0.001), and particularly so in young people with Type 1 diabetes. The fully adjusted increase was 13.8 ms (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-19.0 ms, P <0.001) at age 20 years and 3.4 ms (CI: 1.5-5.3 ms, P<0.001) at age 40 years. The rate-corrected QRSc was increased in people with Type 1 diabetes (97±11 vs. 95±11 ms, P <0.001) and was age-independent (P =0.5). JTc was increased in the young people with Type 1 diabetes (10.7 ms (CI: 5.4-16.0 ms, P <0.001) at age 20 years), but not in older people with Type 1 diabetes (interaction age-diabetes, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For people with Type 1 diabetes, cardiac depolarization is increased at all ages, whereas repolarization is increased only relatively in young people with Type 1 diabetes. Hence, young people with Type 1 diabetes may be more prone to ventricular arrhythmias. The findings contribute to the understanding of sudden cardiac death in young people with Type 1 diabetes.
AIMS: To investigate depolarization and repolarization durations in people with Type 1 diabetes, including the relationship to age. METHODS: 855 persons with Type 1 diabetes without known heart disease were included and matched with 1710 participants from a general population study. Clinical examinations, questionnaires and biochemistry were assessed. A 10-second 12-lead ECG was performed and analysed digitally. RESULTS:QTc was longer in people with Type 1 diabetes compared to controls (414±16 vs. 411±19 ms, P <0.001), and particularly so in young people with Type 1 diabetes. The fully adjusted increase was 13.8 ms (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.6-19.0 ms, P <0.001) at age 20 years and 3.4 ms (CI: 1.5-5.3 ms, P<0.001) at age 40 years. The rate-corrected QRSc was increased in people with Type 1 diabetes (97±11 vs. 95±11 ms, P <0.001) and was age-independent (P =0.5). JTc was increased in the young people with Type 1 diabetes (10.7 ms (CI: 5.4-16.0 ms, P <0.001) at age 20 years), but not in older people with Type 1 diabetes (interaction age-diabetes, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For people with Type 1 diabetes, cardiac depolarization is increased at all ages, whereas repolarization is increased only relatively in young people with Type 1 diabetes. Hence, young people with Type 1 diabetes may be more prone to ventricular arrhythmias. The findings contribute to the understanding of sudden cardiac death in young people with Type 1 diabetes.
Authors: Elena Daskalaki; Anne Parkinson; Nicola Brew-Sam; Md Zakir Hossain; David O'Neal; Christopher J Nolan; Hanna Suominen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Christa F Jensen; Emil D Bartels; Thomas H Braunstein; Lars B Nielsen; Niels-Henrik Holstein-Rathlou; Lene N Axelsen; Morten Schak Nielsen Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2019-04
Authors: Katarina Hadova; Eva Kralova; Gabriel Doka; Lenka Bies Pivackova; Zuzana Kmecova; Peter Krenek; Jan Klimas Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.298