Jing Xu1, Xiaoting Zhao2, Dengfeng He3, Jinghui Wang1, Weiying Li2, Yinghui Liu1, Li Ma1, Mei Jiang2, Yu Teng2, Ziyu Wang2, Meng Gu2, Jianbin Wu2, Yue Wang2, Wentao Yue4,5, Shucai Zhang6. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101149, China. 2. Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101149, China. 3. Department of Traditional Chinese medicine, 263 Clinical Department of General Hospital of Beijing Military Region, Beijing, 101149, China. 4. Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101149, China. yuewt@ccmu.edu.cn. 5. Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100026, China. yuewt@ccmu.edu.cn. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101149, China. sczhang6304@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: AZD9291 is an irreversible, small-molecule inhibitor which has potency against mutant EGFR- and T790M-resistant mutation. Despite the encouraging efficacy in clinical, the acquired resistance will finally occur. Further study will need to be done to identify the acquired resistance mechanisms and determine the next treatment. METHODS: We established an AZD9291-resistant cell line (HCC827/AZDR) from parental HCC827 cell line through stepwise pulsed selection of AZD9291. The expression of EGFR and its downstream pathways were determined by western blot analysis or immunofluorescence assay. The sensitivity to indicated agents were evaluated by MTS. RESULTS: Compared with parental HCC827 cells, the HCC827/AZDR cells showed high resistance to AZD9291 and other EGFR-TKIs, and exhibited a mesenchymal-like phenotype. Almost complete loss of EGFR expression was observed in HCC827/AZDR cells. But the activation of downstream pathway, MAPK signaling, was found in HCC827/AZDR cells even in the presence of AZD9291. Inhibition of MAPK signaling had no effect on cell viability of HCC827/AZDR and could not reverse AZD9291 resistance because of the subsequent activation of AKT signaling. When treated with the combination of AKT and MAPK inhibitor, HCC827/AZDR showed remarkable growth inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of EGFR could be proposed as a potential acquired resistance mechanism of AZD9291 in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells with an EMT phenotype. Despite the loss of EGFR, the activation of MAPK pathway which had crosstalk with AKT pathway could maintain the proliferation and survival of resistant cells. Blocking MAPK and AKT signaling may be a potential therapeutic strategy following AZD9291 resistance.
PURPOSE: AZD9291 is an irreversible, small-molecule inhibitor which has potency against mutant EGFR- and T790M-resistant mutation. Despite the encouraging efficacy in clinical, the acquired resistance will finally occur. Further study will need to be done to identify the acquired resistance mechanisms and determine the next treatment. METHODS: We established an AZD9291-resistant cell line (HCC827/AZDR) from parental HCC827 cell line through stepwise pulsed selection of AZD9291. The expression of EGFR and its downstream pathways were determined by western blot analysis or immunofluorescence assay. The sensitivity to indicated agents were evaluated by MTS. RESULTS: Compared with parental HCC827 cells, the HCC827/AZDR cells showed high resistance to AZD9291 and other EGFR-TKIs, and exhibited a mesenchymal-like phenotype. Almost complete loss of EGFR expression was observed in HCC827/AZDR cells. But the activation of downstream pathway, MAPK signaling, was found in HCC827/AZDR cells even in the presence of AZD9291. Inhibition of MAPK signaling had no effect on cell viability of HCC827/AZDR and could not reverse AZD9291 resistance because of the subsequent activation of AKT signaling. When treated with the combination of AKT and MAPK inhibitor, HCC827/AZDR showed remarkable growth inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of EGFR could be proposed as a potential acquired resistance mechanism of AZD9291 in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells with an EMT phenotype. Despite the loss of EGFR, the activation of MAPK pathway which had crosstalk with AKT pathway could maintain the proliferation and survival of resistant cells. Blocking MAPK and AKT signaling may be a potential therapeutic strategy following AZD9291 resistance.
Authors: Catherine A Eberlein; Daniel Stetson; Aleksandra A Markovets; Katherine J Al-Kadhimi; Zhongwu Lai; Paul R Fisher; Catherine B Meador; Paula Spitzler; Eiki Ichihara; Sarah J Ross; Miika J Ahdesmaki; Ambar Ahmed; Laura E Ratcliffe; Elizabeth L Christey O'Brien; Claire H Barnes; Henry Brown; Paul D Smith; Jonathan R Dry; Garry Beran; Kenneth S Thress; Brian Dougherty; William Pao; Darren A E Cross Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kenneth S Thress; Cloud P Paweletz; Enriqueta Felip; Byoung Chul Cho; Daniel Stetson; Brian Dougherty; Zhongwu Lai; Aleksandra Markovets; Ana Vivancos; Yanan Kuang; Dalia Ercan; Sarah E Matthews; Mireille Cantarini; J Carl Barrett; Pasi A Jänne; Geoffrey R Oxnard Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Tony S Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Myung-Ju Ahn; Marina C Garassino; Hye R Kim; Suresh S Ramalingam; Frances A Shepherd; Yong He; Hiroaki Akamatsu; Willemijn S M E Theelen; Chee K Lee; Martin Sebastian; Alison Templeton; Helen Mann; Marcelo Marotti; Serban Ghiorghiu; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yuliana Yosaatmadja; Shevan Silva; James M Dickson; Adam V Patterson; Jeff B Smaill; Jack U Flanagan; Mark J McKeage; Christopher J Squire Journal: J Struct Biol Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 2.867
Authors: Jacob J Chabon; Andrew D Simmons; Alexander F Lovejoy; Mohammad S Esfahani; Aaron M Newman; Henry J Haringsma; David M Kurtz; Henning Stehr; Florian Scherer; Chris A Karlovich; Thomas C Harding; Kathleen A Durkin; Gregory A Otterson; W Thomas Purcell; D Ross Camidge; Jonathan W Goldman; Lecia V Sequist; Zofia Piotrowska; Heather A Wakelee; Joel W Neal; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ashley Maynard; Caroline E McCoach; Julia K Rotow; Lincoln Harris; Franziska Haderk; D Lucas Kerr; Elizabeth A Yu; Erin L Schenk; Weilun Tan; Alexander Zee; Michelle Tan; Philippe Gui; Tasha Lea; Wei Wu; Anatoly Urisman; Kirk Jones; Rene Sit; Pallav K Kolli; Eric Seeley; Yaron Gesthalter; Daniel D Le; Kevin A Yamauchi; David M Naeger; Sourav Bandyopadhyay; Khyati Shah; Lauren Cech; Nicholas J Thomas; Anshal Gupta; Mayra Gonzalez; Hien Do; Lisa Tan; Bianca Bacaltos; Rafael Gomez-Sjoberg; Matthew Gubens; Thierry Jahan; Johannes R Kratz; David Jablons; Norma Neff; Robert C Doebele; Jonathan Weissman; Collin M Blakely; Spyros Darmanis; Trever G Bivona Journal: Cell Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Neal Shah; Zhongwei Liu; Rachel M Tallman; Afroz Mohammad; Samuel A Sprowls; Pushkar A Saralkar; Schuyler D Vickers; Mark V Pinti; Weimin Gao; Paul R Lockman Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 4.430