Literature DB >> 29796792

Livestock and livelihoods of smallholder cattle-owning households in Cambodia: the contribution of on-farm and off-farm activities to income and food security.

Katherine Ashley1, Holly Harrison2, Phalleap Hok Chan3, Suon Sothoeun3, James Robert Young2, Peter Andrew Windsor2, Russell David Bush2.   

Abstract

The majority of smallholder farming households in Cambodia are rurally based and rely on agriculture to support their livelihoods. However, in recent years, growth in the agriculture sector has stagnated with farmers facing several challenges including declining prices for traditional crops and irregular rainfall patterns. This has led to a need for farmers to diversify income sources with livestock promoted as a more viable livelihood activity, particularly the raising of cattle and poultry. However, uncertain profitability of livestock activities is a common perception by smallholders, especially where animals have not been traditionally viewed as a primary income source. To address this, information is required which compares the income and expenses associated with livestock raising to other on-farm activities and off-farm sources. This study reports on a survey of livelihood survey of 17 male and 21 female representatives of 20 households owning cattle in Cambodia, comparing the associated income and expenses of the various livelihood activities in the 12-month period from January to December 2016. Combined total household income from both on-farm and off-farm sources ranged from USD875 to 17730 with an average of USD6779, representing 51% and 49% from on-farm and off-farm activities, respectively. Cattle raising was the most common source of on-farm income (85%), contributing USD1064 and representing 22% of total household income. General household expenses, such as food and transportation (including expenses associated with off-farm employment), represented the majority of total household expenses (79%). Gross profit calculations indicated higher values for pig raising (USD1841.79), cattle (USD950.80) and non-rice crops (USD884) whilst the highest gross margin value was recorded for cattle (89.33%) followed by vegetables (85.27%) and non-rice crops (83.08%). Whilst wet season and dry season rice returned a negative gross profit value of USD197.27 and USD90.60 on average per household, respectively, both were ranked as most important for household consumption, followed by poultry, providing the main source of energy (rice) and protein (chicken meat) and sustaining household food requirements. The study concludes that although smallholder cattle-owning households in Cambodia undertake a diverse range of on-farm activities, as cattle raising provides a superior income source due to higher returns and lower variable costs, it could be promoted as a preferred livelihood activity by agencies conducting rural extension activities. Although consideration of available labour and monetary funds to invest in cattle raising is required, it was observed that income from off-farm sources may prove beneficial in providing the additional monetary funds to support cattle-raising activities and assist in providing generally poor smallholder households with enhanced economic resilience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Financial analysis; Livestock; Mixed farming systems; Returns

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29796792     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-018-1615-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of biological and economic efficiency of smallholder pig production systems in North Vietnam.

Authors:  U Lemke; B Kaufmann; L T Thuy; K Emrich; A Valle Zárate
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 2.  A one health perspective on HPAI H5N1 in the Greater Mekong sub-region.

Authors:  Dirk U Pfeiffer; Martin J Otte; David Roland-Holst; David Zilberman
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.268

3.  Impacts on rural livelihoods in Cambodia following adoption of best practice health and husbandry interventions by smallholder cattle farmers.

Authors:  J R Young; R A O'Reilly; K Ashley; S Suon; I V Leoung; P A Windsor; R D Bush
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.005

4.  Survey of smallholder beef cattle production systems in different agro-ecological zones of Cambodia.

Authors:  Pok Samkol; Keo Sath; Mikaela Patel; Peter Andrew Windsor; Kjell Holtenius
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 5.  The roles of livestock in developing countries.

Authors:  M Herrero; D Grace; J Njuki; N Johnson; D Enahoro; S Silvestri; M C Rufino
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A community-based education trial to improve backyard poultry biosecurity in rural Cambodia.

Authors:  Anne Conan; Aurélia Ponsich; Flavie Luce Goutard; Ratana Khiev; Arnaud Tarantola; San Sorn; Sirenda Vong
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.112

7.  Household practices related to disease transmission between animals and humans in rural Cambodia.

Authors:  Kristina Osbjer; Sofia Boqvist; Seng Sokerya; Chheng Kannarath; Sorn San; Holl Davun; Ulf Magnusson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Farming and the geography of nutrient production for human use: a transdisciplinary analysis.

Authors:  Mario Herrero; Philip K Thornton; Brendan Power; Jessica R Bogard; Roseline Remans; Steffen Fritz; James S Gerber; Gerald Nelson; Linda See; Katharina Waha; Reg A Watson; Paul C West; Leah H Samberg; Jeannette van de Steeg; Eloise Stephenson; Mark van Wijk; Petr Havlík
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2017-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.