Susanne Jacobsson1, Daniel Golparian1, Nicole Scangarella-Oman2, Magnus Unemo1. 1. WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections, National Reference Laboratory for Sexually Transmitted Infections, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. 2. GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Abstract
Objectives: Increased antimicrobial resistance surveillance and new effective antimicrobials are crucial to maintain treatable gonorrhoea. We examined the in vitro activity of gepotidacin, a novel triazaacenaphthylene, and the effect of efflux pump inactivation on clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates and international reference strains (n = 252) and compared gepotidacin with antimicrobials currently or previously recommended for gonorrhoea treatment. Methods: MICs (mg/L) were determined by agar dilution (gepotidacin) or by Etest (seven other antimicrobials). The gyrA and parC genes were sequenced and the impact of inactivation of the MtrCDE, MacAB and NorM efflux pumps on gepotidacin MICs was examined. Results: Gepotidacin showed potent in vitro activity against all gonococcal isolates (n = 252; MIC ≤4 mg/L). The modal MIC, MIC50, MIC90 and MIC range of gepotidacin were 0.5, 0.5, 1 and 0.032-4 mg/L, respectively. Inactivation of the MtrCDE efflux pump, but not MacAB or NorM, decreased the gepotidacin MICs for most strains. No significant cross-resistance between gepotidacin and any other antimicrobials, including the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin, was identified. However, the ParC D86N mutation (possibly together with additional antimicrobial resistance mutation), which is associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, was associated with increased gepotidacin MICs. Conclusions: Gepotidacin demonstrated high in vitro activity against gonococcal strains, indicating that gepotidacin could potentially be an effective option for gonorrhoea treatment, particularly in a dual antimicrobial therapy regimen and for patients with resistance or allergy to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Nevertheless, elucidating in vitro and in vivo resistance emergence and mechanisms in detail, together with further gonorrhoea clinical studies, ideally also including chlamydia and Mycoplasma genitalium are essential.
Objectives: Increased antimicrobial resistance surveillance and new effective antimicrobials are crucial to maintain treatable gonorrhoea. We examined the in vitro activity of gepotidacin, a novel triazaacenaphthylene, and the effect of efflux pump inactivation on clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates and international reference strains (n = 252) and compared gepotidacin with antimicrobials currently or previously recommended for gonorrhoea treatment. Methods: MICs (mg/L) were determined by agar dilution (gepotidacin) or by Etest (seven other antimicrobials). The gyrA and parC genes were sequenced and the impact of inactivation of the MtrCDE, MacAB and NorM efflux pumps on gepotidacin MICs was examined. Results:Gepotidacin showed potent in vitro activity against all gonococcal isolates (n = 252; MIC ≤4 mg/L). The modal MIC, MIC50, MIC90 and MIC range of gepotidacin were 0.5, 0.5, 1 and 0.032-4 mg/L, respectively. Inactivation of the MtrCDE efflux pump, but not MacAB or NorM, decreased the gepotidacin MICs for most strains. No significant cross-resistance between gepotidacin and any other antimicrobials, including the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin, was identified. However, the ParC D86N mutation (possibly together with additional antimicrobial resistance mutation), which is associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, was associated with increased gepotidacin MICs. Conclusions: Gepotidacin demonstrated high in vitro activity against gonococcal strains, indicating that gepotidacin could potentially be an effective option for gonorrhoea treatment, particularly in a dual antimicrobial therapy regimen and for patients with resistance or allergy to extended-spectrum cephalosporins. Nevertheless, elucidating in vitro and in vivo resistance emergence and mechanisms in detail, together with further gonorrhoea clinical studies, ideally also including chlamydia and Mycoplasma genitalium are essential.
Authors: Magnus Unemo; Monica M Lahra; Michelle Cole; Patricia Galarza; Francis Ndowa; Irene Martin; Jo-Anne R Dillon; Pilar Ramon-Pardo; Gail Bolan; Teodora Wi Journal: Sex Health Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.706
Authors: Yanran Lu; Chelsea A Mann; Sheri Nolan; Jessica A Collins; Elizabeth Parker; Jonathan Papa; Sandip Vibhute; Seyedehameneh Jahanbakhsh; Mary Thwaites; David Hufnagel; Manzour H Hazbón; Jane Moreno; Timothy T Stedman; Thomas Wittum; Daniel J Wozniak; Neil Osheroff; Jack C Yalowich; Mark J Mitton-Fry Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Sabine Schuster; Martina Vavra; Raphael Köser; John W A Rossen; Winfried V Kern Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Aline Barth; Mohammad Hossain; Darin B Brimhall; Caroline R Perry; Courtney A Tiffany; Sherry Xu; Etienne F Dumont Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-10-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nicole E Scangarella-Oman; Mohammad Hossain; Paula B Dixon; Karen Ingraham; Sharon Min; Courtney A Tiffany; Caroline R Perry; Aparna Raychaudhuri; Etienne F Dumont; Jianzhong Huang; Edward W Hook; Linda A Miller Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 5.191