Literature DB >> 29796593

What is the agronomic potential of biofertilizers for maize? A meta-analysis.

Jennifer E Schmidt1, Amélie C M Gaudin1.   

Abstract

Biofertilizers are promoted as a strategy for sustainable intensification of agriculture, but their efficacy varies widely among published studies and it is unclear whether they deliver the promised benefits. Studies are commonly conducted under controlled conditions prior to deployment in the field, yet the predictive value of such studies for field-scale productivity has not been critically examined. A meta-analysis was conducted using a novel host crop-specific approach to evaluate the agronomic potential of bacterial biofertilizers for maize. Yield increases tended to be slightly higher and more variable in greenhouse studies using field soil than in the field, and greenhouse studies poorly predicted the influence of moderating climate, soil and taxonomic variables. We found greater efficacy of Azospirillum spp. and lower efficacy of Bacillus spp. and Enterobacter spp. under field conditions. Surprisingly, biofertilizer strains with confirmed plant-growth-promoting traits such as phosphorus solubilization, nitrogen fixation and phytohormone production in vitro were associated with lower yields in the field than strains not confirmed to possess these traits; only 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase synthesis increased yields. These results indicate the need for a novel biofertilizer development framework that integrates information from native soil microbial communities and prioritizes field validation of results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29796593     DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiy094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  7 in total

1.  Priming maize seeds with cyanobacteria enhances seed vigour and plant growth in elite maize inbreds.

Authors:  Vikas Sharma; Radha Prasanna; Firoz Hossain; Vignesh Muthusamy; Lata Nain; Shrila Das; Yashbir Singh Shivay; Arun Kumar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Rs-198 Liquid Biofertilizers Affect Microbial Community Diversity and Enzyme Activities and Promote Vitis vinifera L. Growth.

Authors:  Huadan Lu; Zhansheng Wu; Wenfei Wang; Xiaolin Xu; Xiaochen Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Field Site-Specific Effects of an Azospirillum Seed Inoculant on Key Microbial Functional Groups in the Rhizosphere.

Authors:  Sébastien Renoud; Jordan Vacheron; Danis Abrouk; Claire Prigent-Combaret; Laurent Legendre; Daniel Muller; Yvan Moënne-Loccoz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A Global Network Meta-Analysis of the Promotion of Crop Growth, Yield, and Quality by Bioeffectors.

Authors:  Michelle Natalie Herrmann; Yuan Wang; Jens Hartung; Tobias Hartmann; Wei Zhang; Peteh Mehdi Nkebiwe; Xinping Chen; Torsten Müller; Huaiyu Yang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Advancement of Metatranscriptomics towards Productive Agriculture and Sustainable Environment: A Review.

Authors:  Siti Suhailah Sharuddin; Norhayati Ramli; Mohd Zulkhairi Mohd Yusoff; Nor Azlan Nor Muhammad; Li Sim Ho; Toshinari Maeda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  The Status of Soil Microbiome as Affected by the Application of Phosphorus Biofertilizer: Fertilizer Enriched with Beneficial Bacterial Strains.

Authors:  Mateusz Mącik; Agata Gryta; Lidia Sas-Paszt; Magdalena Frąc
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Action of Microbial Biocontrol Agents against Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Rocío Roca-Couso; José David Flores-Félix; Raúl Rivas
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.