Literature DB >> 29796224

Association between biofilm production, adhesion genes and drugs resistance in different SCCmec types of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from several major hospitals of Iran.

Lida Bimanand1, Morovat Taherikalani1, Farid Azizi Jalilian1, Nourkhoda Sadeghifard1, Sobhan Ghafourian1,2, Zahra Mahdavi1, Sattar Mohamadi1, Kouresh Sayehmiri3, Ali Hematian2, Iraj Pakzad1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The ability of bacteria to produce biofilm and adhesion makes them more resistant to antibiotics. The current study aims to evaluate the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and to determine the prevalence of adhesion genes, also their correlation with drug resistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 MRSA were collected from hospitals of Iran's western provinces during 2012 to 2013. The presence of ica A, B, C, D, clfA, cna, fnbA, mecA genes were determined by PCR technique. Biofilm formation was studied by microtiter plate assay, the clonal relations of the strains were examined by SCCmec and Spa typing.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated that 96 % of isolates were biofilm producers. The distributions of biofilm formation between isolates were 4.2%, 54.2%, 35.4% as high, moderate and weak, respectivelly. The highest biofilm production was observed from blood culture isolates. All virulent genes icaA,B, C, D, clfA, cna, fnbA were observed in moderate and weak biofilm formation isolates. Among high biofilm formation isolates, icaB and cna genes were not seen. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between ica, fnbA and the biofilm production, but there was not a significant correlation between the type of samples and drug resistance, spa type and SCCmec type with biofilm production (P>0.05). Frequency of All virulent genes in type III SCCmec was higher than other types.
CONCLUSION: The majority of MRSA isolates were biofilm producers and blood isolates ranked as the great biofilm producer. In these isolates ica D and fnbA genes are correlated with biofilm production.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiseptic; Biofilm; MRSA; Resistance genes qacA/B

Year:  2018        PMID: 29796224      PMCID: PMC5960757          DOI: 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.19378.5132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 2008-3866            Impact factor:   2.699


Instroduction

The surface adhering of bacteria to implantable medical devices is due to biofilm formation. Device associated infections distinctly impact patient morbidity and mortality (1). One of the most frequent causes of biofilm-associated infections is Staphylococcus aureus (2). Biofilm matrix and change of phenotypic characteristics of bacteria in biofilm related to infection result to resistance to antimicrobial drugs. In healthcare center, where there is an antibiotic abuse, a key survival mechanism factor of S. aureus is capacity to biofilm formation on implanted medical devices and damaged host tissues. Almost the majority of studies reported the icaA, D, B, C operon, produced polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA) (3), as main mechanism for biofilm formation. But another mechanism on biofilm formation independent of the ica operon has also been reported in S. aureus. The four ica operon biosynthesis genes are icaA, icaD, icaB, and icaC and a transcribed repressor, icaR (4). A study revealed mutation in the ica genes of S. aureus diminished biofilm development and PIA making (5). Another mechanism of ica independent biofilm formation mediated by the biofilm associated protein (Bap), this mechanism is sensitive to proteinase k (6). This study aims to evaluate the drug resistance, biofilm formation and prevalence of adhesion gene in S. aureus collected from four major hospitals of western provinces of Iran.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

Ninety six methicillin resistant S. aureus were collected from four major hospitals including Ilam, Kermanshah, Hamadan, and Khoramabad hospitals in Iran during 2012 to 2013. The presence of mecA gene confirmed by PCR. MRSA strains were stored at −80 °C in the appropriate media with 15% (v/v) glycerol until use.

Microtiter plate assay for assessment of biofilm formation

MRSA clinical isolates were grown overnight in Muller Hinton broth (MH; GibcoBRL) supplemented with 0.25% glucose. Cultures were then diluted 1:200 and incubated overnight in 96 microtiter plates at 35 °C. Microtiter wells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, dried in an inverted position, and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (2). Then, plates were incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes, and after 2 times washing, solubilized in 200 µl of 95% ethanol and then read with ELISA reader at 570 nm wavelength (Jenway, England).

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Susceptibility testing of isolates was done using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method according to the references of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (7). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to the following antibiotics was accomplished by using the disc diffusion method: oxacillin (1 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (30 μg), cefotaxime (Ce, 30 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), rifampin (5 μg), linezolid (30 μg), cinercide (15 μg), tigecycllin (5 μg), clindamycin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), and imipenem(10 μg)(Mast, Engeland).

Detection of virulence genes

DNA was extracted using a Genomic DNA purification kit (Fermentas, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The icaA, icaB, icaC, icaD, clfA, cna, fnbA, and mecA genes in S. aureus were investigated by polymerase chain reaction. All primer sequences and PCR condition are shown in Table 1. The PCR reactions were performed using Bio-Rad Thermocycle (Bio-Rad, USA). In the PCR, each reaction contained 1 μl (10 pmol) of forward primer, 1 μl (10 pmol) of reverse primer for each primer, 12,5 μl master mix, 4 μl of DNA extract and final volume was 25 μl by adding sterile water. PCR of icaC, icaD, can and fnbA genes were performed using an initial denaturation step 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 sec, 53 °C for 45 sec, 72 °C for 30 sec, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. While the cycling conditions for ica A, ica B and clfA genes were as follows: DNA denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 60 sec, 57 °C for 57 sec, 72 °C for 60 sec, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min. The cycling conditions for mecA gene was similar with ica C, but annealing temperature was 67 °C for 45 sec. The PCR products were stained with DNA safe and electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel at 80 V for 30 min.
Table 1

The PCR conditions and specific primers used in the present study

GenePrimer sequencePCR product (bp)Tm annealing (°C)
mecAF: GTG GAA GTT AGA TTG GGA TCA TAG54467
R: GTC AAC GAT TGT GAC ACG ATA GC
Ica AF: GAC CTC GAA GTC AAT AGA GGT18857
R: CCC AGT ATA ACG TTG GTA ACC
Ica BF: ATC GCT TAA AGC ACA CGA CGC90057
R: TAT CGG CAT CTG GTG TGA CAG
Ica CF: ATA AAC TTG AAT TGA TGT ATT900-110053
R: ATA TAT AAA ACT CTC TTA ACA
Ica DF: AGC CAA TAT CCA ACG GTA CAG25053
R: GTC ACG ACC TTT CTT ATA CGC
cnaF: AGG ATC AGA TTC AAG GTG ACA60053
R: GAG TGC CTT TCC CAA CCT GAC
clfAF: CGA TTG GGC GTG GCt TTC AGC30057
R: GCC AGT AGC CCA ATG TCA CGC
fnbAF: GCG GAG ATC AAA GAC ATA TCA11053
R: CCA TCT ATA GCT GTG TGG TCC
The PCR conditions and specific primers used in the present study

Statistical analysis

The data on production of biofilms by the strains of S. aureus was analyzed by the statistical software SPSS version 19.0. P-value were calculated using the Chi square test. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Out of 96 isolates of S. aureus examined, 92 (95.8%) produced biofilms. The power and distribution of bio-film production according to the source of isolates are shown in Table 2. The distribution of virulence genes is presented in Table 3 and 5. The results demonstrated that 96 % of isolates were biofilm producers. The distributions of biofilm formation between isolates were 4.2%, 54.2%, 35.4% as high, moderate and weak, respectivelly. The highest biofilm production was observed from blood culture isolates. All virulent genes icaA, B/C/D, clfA, cna, fnbA were observed in moderate and weak biofilm formation isolates. Among high biofilm formation isolates, icaB and cna genes were not seen. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between icaD and fnbA and the biofilm production (Figure 1), but there was not a significant correlation between the type of samples and drug resistance or spa type and SCCmec type with biofilm production (P>0.05). Frequency of all virulent genes in type III SCCmec was higher than other types. Table 4 demonstrates the antibiotic susceptibility results.
Table 2

Distribution of 96 biofilm forming strains of Staphylococcus aureus according to clinical samples

Clinical sample (No)No of strains according to degree of biofilm formationP-value

HighModerateWeakNon biofilm
No%No%No%No%
Urine 4122.11616.71919.844.2<0.05
Blood culture 3422.12121.91111.500<0.05
Ulcer 15001212.533.100<0.05
Sputum 60055.21100<0.05
Total 9644.25456.23435.444.2<0.05
Table 5

Frequency of Adhesion genes in deferent SCCmec types of Staphylococcus aureus

SCCmec TypesFrequency of adhesion genes (%)

ica Aica Bica Cica Dfnb Aclf Acna
Non type,20.85.22.115.615.620.81
III27.16.33.131.322.9266.2
IVc7.32.14.211.511.59.46.2
IVd9.412.19.46.210.52.1
V3.10012.12.10
Total67.714.611.568.858.368.815.6
P-Value>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05

Classification of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus, ica ABCD, Collagen adhesion-encoding gene (can), Clumping factor A gene (clf A), Fibronectin binding protein A gene (fnb A)

Figure 1

Electrophoresis of PCR products for identification of adhesion genes of S. aureus: A, M (100 bp marker), ica C (lane 1), ica D (lane 2), fnb A (lane 2), cna (lane 3) genes. B ica A (band 3), ica B(band 1), clf A(band 2)

Table 4

drug resistance pattern in biofilm former and non-biofilm former of staphylococcus aureus

AntibioticNon biofilm former(N=4)Biofilm former(N=92)Total(N=96)

S (%)R (%)S (%)R (%)S (%)R (%)
Tetracyclin752576.123.97624
Gentamicin752569.630.469.830.2
Oxacillin010023.976.122.977.1
Erythromycin100066.333.767.732.3
Vancomycin100010001000
Penicilln010001000100
Synercid100010001000
Amikacin100083.716.384.415.6
Imipenem100097.92.197.92.1
Linezolid100010001000
Tigecyclin100010001000
Ciprofloxacin752571.828.271.928.1
Clindamycin100071.828.272.927.1
Rifampin1000871387.512.5
Distribution of 96 biofilm forming strains of Staphylococcus aureus according to clinical samples Frequency of adhesion genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates according to sample sources The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus, ica ABCD, Collagen adhesion-encoding gene (can), Clumping factor A gene (clf A), Fibronectin binding protein A gene (fnb A) drug resistance pattern in biofilm former and non-biofilm former of staphylococcus aureus Frequency of Adhesion genes in deferent SCCmec types of Staphylococcus aureus Classification of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus, ica ABCD, Collagen adhesion-encoding gene (can), Clumping factor A gene (clf A), Fibronectin binding protein A gene (fnb A) Electrophoresis of PCR products for identification of adhesion genes of S. aureus: A, M (100 bp marker), ica C (lane 1), ica D (lane 2), fnb A (lane 2), cna (lane 3) genes. B ica A (band 3), ica B(band 1), clf A(band 2)

Discussion

The ability of bacteria to produce biofilm and adhesion makes them more resistant to antibiotics. Bacterial adhesion factor is considered as a virulence factor that plays an important role in infections associated with catheters and other indwelling medical devices (8). The ability of S. aureus to colonize in artificial material is associated with two main mechanisms; production of polysaccharide slime, and adhesions for the host matrix proteins that are adsorbed onto the biomaterial surface (9). When the biofilm formed, it would be easy to escape from immune systems and to cause chronic infections (10). Although PIA is important for biofilm formation by S. aureus, this study found that only one gene of ica operon i.e icaD and fnbA genes is related with biofilm production in this isolates. Our analysis demonstrated that the blood culture isolates were more biofilm producers. So that, we suggest more study should be done to determine why the biofilm formation in different conditions of body is not equal. The only reason we focused on is immune system and escaping of bacteria via biofilm production. Although, many genes and conditions are responsible to biofilm production but our results demonstrated that icaD and fnbA genes has a critical role in biofilm formation. Study by Arciola et al (11). demonstrated that all S. aureus biofilm positive strains possess icaD genes that required for full slime synthesis. Another study results confirmed that there is a relationship only between icaD and biofilm production in MRSA strains (12); this is consistent with our results that showed the main role of icaD for biofilm formation. In this study, in spite of this fact that SCCmec type III is the most prevalent in MRSA strains, but SCCmec non-type able strains are more prevalent than SCCmec type III among biofilm producers. This indicates that biofilm producers’ strains are mainly community acquired. Another study showed that MRSA strains which had the ability to produce biofilm were SCCmec type III and V (13).

Conclusion

The majority of MRSA isolates were biofilm producers and blood isolates placed as the great biofilm producer. Only icaD and fnbA genes are correlated with biofilm production, But there was not a significant correlation between the drug resistance or spa type and SCCmec type with biofilm production.
Table 3

Frequency of adhesion genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates according to sample sources

Percent of adhesion genesDegree of biofilm formationcnaclf Afnb Aica Dica Cica Bica A
High4.2013.13.14.20
Moderate32.29.46.344.837.634.411.4
Weak29.25.24.218.815.528.14.2
Non biofilm2.1002.12.12.10
Total67.714.611.568.858.368.815.6
P value>0.05>0.05<0.05>0.05<0.05>0.05>0.05

The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus, ica ABCD, Collagen adhesion-encoding gene (can), Clumping factor A gene (clf A), Fibronectin binding protein A gene (fnb A)

  11 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms.

Authors:  B D Hoyle; J W Costerton
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Host-bacteria interactions in foreign body infections.

Authors:  P François; P Vaudaux; T J Foster; D P Lew
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Genes encoding adhesion factors and biofilm formation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Morocco.

Authors:  Bahija Serray; Salwa Oufrid; Imane Hannaoui; Fatna Bourjilate; Nabila Soraa; Mostafa Mliji; Mohammed Sobh; Abderrahmane Hammoumi; Mohammed Timinouni; Mohamed El Azhari
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 4.  Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease.

Authors:  Nathan K Archer; Mark J Mazaitis; J William Costerton; Jeff G Leid; Mary Elizabeth Powers; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.882

5.  Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections.

Authors:  C R Arciola; L Baldassarri; L Montanaro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Slime production and expression of the slime-associated antigen by staphylococcal clinical isolates.

Authors:  M G Ammendolia; R Di Rosa; L Montanaro; C R Arciola; L Baldassarri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: importance and implications.

Authors:  James P O'Gara; Hilary Humphreys
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Predominance of SCCmec types IV and V among biofilm producing device-associated Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from tertiary care hospitals in Mysuru, India.

Authors:  Pradeep Halebeedu Prakash; Vineeth Rajan; Shubha Gopal
Journal:  Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 1.731

9.  A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the identification of collagen adhesin gene (CNA) in Staphylococcus-induced prosthesis infections.

Authors:  L Montanaro; C R Arciola; E Borsetti; M Brigotti; L Baldassarri
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.479

10.  Role of biofilm-associated protein bap in the pathogenesis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Carme Cucarella; M Angeles Tormo; Carles Ubeda; M Pilar Trotonda; Marta Monzón; Critòfol Peris; Beatriz Amorena; Iñigo Lasa; José R Penadés
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the Frequency of Biofilm-Forming Genes (icaABCD) in Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Strains Isolated from Human and Livestock.

Authors:  C Mohammadi Mollaahmadi; Y Anzabi; J Shayegh
Journal:  Arch Razi Inst       Date:  2021-12-30

2.  Investigating the relation between resistance pattern and type of Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Christiana Rezk Bottros Youssef; Ashraf Ahmed Kadry; Amira Mohammed El-Ganiny
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2022-02

3.  Ability of biofilm production and molecular analysis of spa and ica genes among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mitra Omidi; Farzaneh Firoozeh; Mahmood Saffari; Hossein Sedaghat; Mohammad Zibaei; Azad Khaledi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-01-07

4.  Epidemiological Characteristics of Staphylococcus Aureus in Raw Goat Milk in Shaanxi Province, China.

Authors:  Weidong Qian; Lanfang Shen; Xinchen Li; Ting Wang; Miao Liu; Wenjing Wang; Yuting Fu; Qiao Zeng
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-08

5.  The Prevalence, Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus in Bulk Ready-To-Eat Foods.

Authors:  Qi Lin; Honghu Sun; Kai Yao; Jiong Cai; Yao Ren; Yuanlong Chi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-09-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.