BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness of the telephone chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guided by a pre-recorded instructional audio when compared with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation. METHODS: It was a prospective, blind, randomised controlled study involving 109 medical students without previous CPR training. In a standardized mannequin scenario, after the step of dispatcher-assisted cardiac arrest recognition, the participants performed compression-only resuscitation guided over the telephone by either: (1) the pre-recorded instructional audio (n=57); or (2) verbal dispatcher assistance (n=52). The simulation video records were reviewed to assess the CPR performance using a 13-item checklist. The interval from call reception to the first compression, total number and rate of compressions, total number and duration of pauses after the first compression were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the recording-assisted and dispatcher-assisted groups based on the overall performance score (5.6±2.2 vs. 5.1±1.9, P>0.05) or individual criteria of the CPR performance checklist. The recording-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter time interval from call receipt to the first compression (86.0±14.3 vs. 91.2±14.2 s, P<0.05), higher compression rate (94.9±26.4 vs. 89.1±32.8 min-1) and number of compressions provided (170.2±48.0 vs. 156.2±60.7). CONCLUSION: When provided by untrained persons in the simulated settings, the compression-only resuscitation guided by the pre-recorded instructional audio is no less efficient than dispatcher-assisted CPR. Future studies are warranted to further assess feasibility of using instructional audio aid as a potential alternative to dispatcher assistance.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To assess the effectiveness of the telephone chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guided by a pre-recorded instructional audio when compared with dispatcher-assisted resuscitation. METHODS: It was a prospective, blind, randomised controlled study involving 109 medical students without previous CPR training. In a standardized mannequin scenario, after the step of dispatcher-assisted cardiac arrest recognition, the participants performed compression-only resuscitation guided over the telephone by either: (1) the pre-recorded instructional audio (n=57); or (2) verbal dispatcher assistance (n=52). The simulation video records were reviewed to assess the CPR performance using a 13-item checklist. The interval from call reception to the first compression, total number and rate of compressions, total number and duration of pauses after the first compression were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the recording-assisted and dispatcher-assisted groups based on the overall performance score (5.6±2.2 vs. 5.1±1.9, P>0.05) or individual criteria of the CPR performance checklist. The recording-assisted group demonstrated significantly shorter time interval from call receipt to the first compression (86.0±14.3 vs. 91.2±14.2 s, P<0.05), higher compression rate (94.9±26.4 vs. 89.1±32.8 min-1) and number of compressions provided (170.2±48.0 vs. 156.2±60.7). CONCLUSION: When provided by untrained persons in the simulated settings, the compression-only resuscitation guided by the pre-recorded instructional audio is no less efficient than dispatcher-assisted CPR. Future studies are warranted to further assess feasibility of using instructional audio aid as a potential alternative to dispatcher assistance.
Authors: Christian Vaillancourt; Aikta Verma; John Trickett; Denis Crete; Tammy Beaudoin; Lisa Nesbitt; George A Wells; Ian G Stiell Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2007-08-29 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Tomas Nuño; Bentley J Bobrow; Karen A Rogge-Miller; Micah Panczyk; Terry Mullins; Wayne Tormala; Antonio Estrada; Samuel M Keim; Daniel W Spaite Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Raina M Merchant; Benjamin S Abella; Edem J Abotsi; Thomas M Smith; Judith A Long; Martha E Trudeau; Marion Leary; Peter W Groeneveld; Lance B Becker; David A Asch Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Steven M Bradley; Carol E Fahrenbruch; Hendrika Meischke; Judith Allen; Megan Bloomingdale; Thomas D Rea Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Sang Do Shin; Nurun Nisa Amatullah De Souza; Hideharu Tanaka; Tatsuya Nishiuchi; Kyoung Jun Song; Patrick Chow-In Ko; Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong; Nalinas Khunkhlai; Ghulam Yasin Naroo; Abdul Karim Sarah; Yih Yng Ng; Wen Yun Li; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Philip Weng Kee Leong; Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong; Shalini Arulanandam; Marie Xin Ru Ng; Yih Yng Ng; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Desmond Ren Hao Mao Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 1.858