| Literature DB >> 29796090 |
Juan Manuel Vinas Rios1, Martin Sanchez-Aguilar2, Thomas Kretschmer3, Christian Heinen4, Fatima Azucena Medina Govea2, Sanchez-Rodriguez Jose Juan5, Thomas Schmidt4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The predictors of shunt dependency such as amount of subarachnoid blood, acute hydrocephalus (HC), mode of aneurysm repair, clinical grade at admission and cerebro spinal fluid (CSF) drainage in excess of 1500 ml during the 1st week after the subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have been identified as predictors of shunt dependency. Therefore our main objective is to identify predictors of CSF shunt dependency following non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Entities:
Keywords: Hydrocephalus; Intraventricular hemorraghe; Shunt dependency; Subarachnoid hemorraghe; Vasospasmus
Year: 2018 PMID: 29796090 PMCID: PMC5964876 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-018-0160-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Patient Saf Surg ISSN: 1754-9493
Demographic, clinical, and radiological variables at admission and early management of the studied patients
| Shunt ( | Non-Shunt ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 6/15 | 42/44 | 0.53 |
| Age (years) (median, range) | 57 (29-78) | 56 (21-83) | 0.77 |
| Clinical grade at admission | |||
| H-Ha 1-3 | 15 (71.4%) | 65 (75.5%) | 0.72 |
| H-Ha 4-5 | 6 (28.6%) | 21 (24.5%) | |
| Radiology at admission | |||
| Modified Fisher 1 + 2 (minimal SAH) | 3 (14.2%) | 38 (44.2%) | |
| Modified Fisher 3 + 4 (large SAH) | 18 (85.8%) | 48 (55.8%) | 0.008 |
| Bleeding Supratentorial | 5 (24%) | 18 (21%) | |
| Bleeding Infratentorial | 1 (5%) | 0 | 0.09 |
| Evans index (median, range) | 0.29 (0.23-0.33) | 0.27 (0.21-0.36) | 0.52 |
| Third ventricle in mm | 8 (4.7-13.7) | 6.9 (3-14.3) | |
| Ventricular Score | 79.3 (60-92.6) | 70 (51-103.7) | 0.003 |
| Aneurysmal Source of bleeding | |||
| Middle cerebral artery | 7 (33%) | 20 (23%) | |
| Internal carotid artery | 3 (14%) | 8 (9%) | |
| Anterior cerebral artery | 5 (24%) | 21 (24%) | |
| Posterior circulation | 4 (19%) | 11 (13%) | |
| Non-aneurysmal | 2 (9%) | 26 (30%) | 0.08 |
| Surgical Intervention | |||
| EVD/LDb | 16 (76%) | 28 (32%) | < 0.001 |
| Lamina Terminalis Opening | 5 (24%) | 17 (20%) | 0.09 |
| Decompressive craniectomy | 1 (5%) | 6 (7%) | 0.07 |
| CSF Drainage | |||
| Drainage week 1 (ml) (median, range) | 1523 ± 158 | 1258 ± 122 | 0.63 |
| Drainage week 1-3 (ml) (median, range) | 3364 ± 308 | 2683 ± 233 | 0.76 |
| Clinical vasospasm | 15 (71%) | 36 (42%) | 0.015 |
Significant differences between groups were determined by chi-square test or Fisher exact test for dichotomized or categorical data as appropriate
Continuous data were determined using independent sample T-student test or Mann-Whitney U-test
a HH Hunt and Hess grade
b EVD/LD Extraventricular drainage or lumbar drainage performed
Fig. 1Example of ventricle size estimation
Endovascular treatment (EVT) versus surgical treatment (clipping) in the studied patients
| EVT ( | Surgical ( | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 16/24 | 13/26 | 0.75 |
| Age (years) | 53 (21-80) | 55 (23-77) | 0.87 |
| Clinical grade at admission H-H | |||
| H-Ha 1-3 | 27 (67.5%) | 25 (64%) | 0.08 |
| H-Ha 4-5 | 13 (32.5%) | 14 (36%) | |
| Radiology At Admission | |||
| Modified Fisher 1 + 2 (minimal SAH) | 12 (30%) | 8 (20.5%) | 0.08 |
| Modified Fisher 3 + 4 (large SAH) | 28 (70%) | 31 (79.5%) | |
| Bleeding Supratentorial | 6 (15%) | 17 (43%) | |
| Bleeding Infratentorial | 0 | 1 (2%) | 0.006 |
| Evans index | 0.28 (0.22-0.34) | 0.27 (0.21-0.33) | 0.45 |
| Ventricular Score | 71.5 (58-94.7) | 70.2 (66.8-73.6) | 0.001 |
| Le Roux 0-3 | 0 | 7 (18%) | 0.001 |
| Le Roux ≥4 | 40 (100%) | 32 (82%) | |
| Aneurysmal source of bleeding | |||
| Middle cerebral artery | 6 (40%) | 21 (54%) | |
| Internal carotid artery | 8 (20%) | 3 (8%) | |
| Anterior cerebral artery | 15 (37%) | 11 (28%) | |
| Posterior circulation | 11 (27%) | 4 (11%) | 0.001 |
| Surgical intervention | |||
| Shunt | 8 (20%) | 10 (26%) | 0.004 |
| EVD/LD | 24 (60%) | 14 (36%) | 0.03 |
| Lamina Terminalis Opening | N/A | 22 (56%) | |
| Decompressive craniotomy | 0 | 7 (18%) | 0.001 |
| CSF Drainage | |||
| Drainage week 1 (ml) (median, range) | 1427 ± 456 | 1495 ± 772 | 0.72 |
| Drainage week 1-3 (ml) (median, range) | 2635 ± 1020 | 3107 ± 1240 | 0.67 |
| Clinical Vasospasmus | 27 (67%) | 16 (41%) | 0.023 |
Significant differences between groups are determined by Pearson chi-square test. Continuous data were determined using the independent sample t test
a HH Hunt and Hess grade
b EVD/LD Extraventricular drainage or lumbar drainage performed
Best logistic regression model for shunt dependency
| Parameter | OR | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasospasmus | 5.7 | 4.7 | 6.7 | 0.016 |
| Intraventricular Hemorrhage | 10.9 | 8.0 | 12.8 | < 0.001 |