| Literature DB >> 29796035 |
Sanaz Asemani1, Vahid Montazeri2, Behzad Baradaran3, Mohammad Amin Tabatabiefar4, Saeed Pirouzpanah5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Berberis vulgaris (BV) juice consumption on insulin homeostasis, glycemic profiles of patients with benign breast disease (BBD). This parallel design, triple-blind, randomized and placebo controlled clinical trial was conducted on 85 eligible women diagnosed with BBD who recruited from Nour-Nejat hospital, Tabriz, Iran. Participants were randomly allocated into either intervention group who received BV juice (480 mL/day, n = 44) or BV juice placebo at the same time (480 mL/day, n = 41). After a 7 day run-in period, treatments were administered for the duration of 8 weeks. Participants, care givers and those who assessed laboratory analyses were blinded to the assignments (IRCT registry no: IRCT2012110511335N2). The relative treatment effects of BV supplementation showed decreased serum levels of insulin for 19%, C-peptide for 8%, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) for 16% and glucose to insulin ratio for 22% but HOMA-B increased 44% relative to placebo group over 8 weeks BV supplementation. Although these changes were not statistical significant, the mean changes for C-peptide and HOMA-B were significant just after adjusting for baseline data and covariates. Administration of BV juice showed controlling effects on HOMA related indices, consequently might have beneficial effects on insulin signaling-related functions in women with benign breast tumor.Entities:
Keywords: Benign breast disease; Berberis vulgaris; Breast cancer; Fasting blood sugar; Homeostasis model assessment
Year: 2018 PMID: 29796035 PMCID: PMC5958330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram of the progress through different time compartments of a parallel randomized trial of BV and BV placebo received groups during 8 weeks of intervention. BBD, breast benign tumor disorder; BV, Berberis vulgaris
Demographic and dietary characteristics of BBD patients in placebo and intervention groups at the baseline of study
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 38.45 ± 6.9 | 40.0 | 36.17 ± 7.6 | 40.0 | 0.16 |
| Age at firs delivery (years) | 21.4 ± 3.9 | 20.5 | 21.0 ± 3.8 | 19.5 | 0.66 |
| Age at first menses (years) | 13.4 ± 1.6 | 13.0 | 13.0 ± 1.5 | 13.0 | 0.75 |
|
| |||||
| Total calorie intake (kcal/day) | 10.26 ± 4.07 | 9.07 | 11.99 ± 6.19 | 10.68 | 0.49 |
| Protein intake (g/day) | 52.49 ± 19.20 | 47.24 | 56.41 ± 22.49 | 51.49 | 0.41 |
| Carbohydrate intake (g/day) | 1359 ± 457 | 1298 | 1407 ± 483 | 1272 | 0.21 |
| Fat intake (g/day) | 5.10 ± 3.05 | 4.60 | 4.28 ± 1.93 | 4.20 | 0.25 |
| Saturated fatty acids(g/day) | 32.89 ± 12.20 | 32.49 | 37.15 ± 13.96 | 35.05 | 0.04 |
| Mono saturated fatty acids(g/day) | 9.61 ± 4.19 | 9.18 | 10.65 ± 5.09 | 9.70 | 0.16 |
| Poly saturated fatty acids | 10.47 ± 9.52 | 10.24 | 11.20 ± 10.34 | 10.36 | 0.25 |
| Dietary fiber (g/day) | 0.83 ± 1.16 | 0.76 | 0.69 ± 0.91 | 0.41 | 0.13 |
| Soluble fiber (g/day) | 113 ± 182 | 76 | 120 ± 99 | 84 | 0.64 |
| Insoluble fiber (g/day) | 13.31 ± 6.73 | 11.74 | 14.93 ± 5.66 | 13.48 | 0.61 |
Independent sample t-test was used to compare data. All data were expressed as mean±standard deviation (S.D.) and related median.
Characteristics of histopathological, familial and multivitamin use status among BBD patients in placebo (n = 40) and intervention (n = 40) groups at the baseline of study
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Fibrocystic | 34(85.0) | 35(87.5) | < 0.001 |
| Fibroadenoma | 6(15.0) | 5(12.5) | |
| Others | |||
|
| |||
| No | 35(87.5) | 30(75.0) | < 0.001 |
| Positive | 5(12.5) | 10(25.0) | |
|
| |||
| No | 40(100.0) | 39(97.5) | < 0.001 |
| Positive | 0 | 1(2.5) | |
|
| |||
| Never | 40(100) | 40(100) | N/A |
| Ever | 0 | 0 | |
| Current | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||
| No | 38(95.0) | 35(87.5) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 2(5.0) | 5(12.5) | |
|
| |||
| ≤2 | 1(50.0) | 3(60.0) | 0.680 |
| >2 | 1(50.0) | 2(40.0) | |
|
| |||
| No | 22(55) | 25(62.5) | 0.11 |
| Yes | 18(45) | 15(37.5) | |
|
| |||
| No | 33(82.5) | 28(70) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | 7(17.5) | 12(30) | |
BC, breast cancer; BBD, benign breast disorders.
Chi-square test was performed.
Data was expressed in the form of number of participants (relative frequency, %).
Figure 2.Pearson correlation coefficient value obtained to show the validity of insulin-related indices (dependent variable) in association with serum C-peptide concentration (independent variable) at baseline compartment of the study (n = 80
Serum levels of glycaemic and insulinemic biomarkers at baseline compartment of study and 8 weeks after the intervention in women with BBT who received BV supplementation (BV group) versus placebo juice consumers (control).
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 39 | 0.38 | 0.33 | N/A | 39 | 0.50* | 0.17 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 35 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 35 | 0.51* | 0.22 | 0.72 | 0.10 | (-0.08-0.28) | 0.26 | 0.81 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 40 | 2.27 | 1.06 | N/A | 40 | 2.97* | 1.13 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 40 | 2.56 | 1.12 | 0.23 | 40 | 3.42* | 1.44 | 0.16 | -0.15 | (-0.62-0.32) | 0.13 | 0.92 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 40 | 92.22 | 14.73 | N/A | 40 | 87.85 | 12.14 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 40 | 89.25 | 9.33 | 0.28 | 40 | 91.00 | 10.85 | 0.22 | -6.12 | (-12.7-0.50) | 0.97 | 1.06 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 39 | 0.09 | 0.09 | N/A | 40 | 0.11 | 0.04 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 39 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 37 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.01 | (-0.03-0.06) | 0.44 | 0.84 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 39 | 13.30 | 49.87 | N/A | 39 | 9.69* | 6.54 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 36 | 10.26 | 15.86 | 0.05 | 36 | 9.80* | 9.49 | 0.05 | 375 | (21-730) | 0.86 | 1.44 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 39 | 0.72 | 0.15 | N/A | 40 | 0.62* | 0.06 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 38 | 0.67 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 37 | 0.62* | 0.07 | 0.94 | -0.04 | (-0.11-0.02) | 0.29 | 0.94 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Control | 39 | 345.08 | 219 | N/A | 39 | 186.01* | 49.14 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 |
|
| 36 | 271 | 194 | 0.11 | 36 | 185.23* | 79.07 | 0.92 | 0.15 | (-0.05-0.35) | 0.28 | 0.78 |
All data are expressed in geometric mean ± S.D.. N/A: not applied to this model.
Paired t-test was performed to compare within changes in intervention group during the study.
Independent sample t-test was performed between group.
Repeated measure of ANOVA was carried out in the main effect of model.
Homeostatic model assessment.
Assessment of B-cell functionality.
quantitative insulin sensitivity check index glucose to insulin ratio.
Glucose to insulin ratio.
Changes of dependent variables (plasma levels of glycemic and insulinemic biomarkers) with BV supplementation in women with BBD
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 0.54 ± 0.02a | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.783 |
| Model 2 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.2 | 0.669 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 2.97 ± 0.07 | 3.33 ± 0.12 | 0.029 |
| Model 2 | 2.96 ± 0.07 | 3.35 ± 0.13 | 0.018 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 87.64 ± 0.40 | 94.70 ± 1.24 | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 87.70 ± 0.41 | 94.20 ± 1.44 | < 0.001 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.183 |
| Model 2 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.633 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 666 ± 78 | 973 ± 147 | 0.114 |
| Model 2 | 664 ± 76 | 977 ± 142 | 0.048 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 0.447 |
| Model 2 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 0.359 |
|
| |||
| Model 1 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.02 | 0.697 |
| Model 2 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.252 |
All data are expressed in geometric mean ± S.E..
This p-value obtained from performing ANCOVA.
Weighted least square was performed in ANOVA with adjustment for baseline variable (model 1).
Model 2 obtained from performing ANCOVA after adjustment for the frequency of lactation (n) and BMI (kg/m2) at baseline in addition to baseline variable.
Homeostatic model assessment.
Assessment of B-cell functionality.
quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.
Glucose to insulin ratio.