Literature DB >> 29795955

A Multilevel Bifactor Approach to Construct Validation of Mixed-Format Scales.

Yan Wang1, Eun Sook Kim1, Robert F Dedrick1, John M Ferron1, Tony Tan1.   

Abstract

Wording effects associated with positively and negatively worded items have been found in many scales. Such effects may threaten construct validity and introduce systematic bias in the interpretation of results. A variety of models have been applied to address wording effects, such as the correlated uniqueness model and the correlated traits and correlated methods model. This study presents the multilevel bifactor approach to handling wording effects of mixed-format scales used in a multilevel context. The Students Confident in Mathematics scale is used to illustrate this approach. Results from comparing a series of models showed that positive and negative wording effects were present at both the within and the between levels. When the wording effects were ignored, the within-level predictive validity of the Students Confident in Mathematics scale was close to that under the multilevel bifactor model. However, at the between level, a lower validity coefficient was observed when ignoring the wording effects. Implications for applied researchers are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  construct validation; mixed-format scales; multilevel bifactor model; wording effects

Year:  2017        PMID: 29795955      PMCID: PMC5965661          DOI: 10.1177/0013164417690858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  15 in total

Review 1.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

2.  Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?

Authors:  H W Marsh
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-04

3.  Energy, fatigue, or both? A bifactor modeling approach to the conceptualization and measurement of vitality.

Authors:  Nina Deng; Rick Guyer; John E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: a bifactor answer to a two-factor question?

Authors:  Michael T McKay; Daniel Boduszek; Séamus A Harvey
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2014-06-18

5.  Comparing Cattell-Horn-Carroll factor models: differences between bifactor and higher order factor models in predicting language achievement.

Authors:  A Alexander Beaujean; Jason Parkin; Sonia Parker
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2014-05-19

6.  The hierarchical factor model of ADHD: invariant across age and national groupings?

Authors:  Maggie E Toplak; Geoff B Sorge; David B Flora; Wai Chen; Tobias Banaschewski; Jan Buitelaar; Richard Ebstein; Jacques Eisenberg; Barbara Franke; Michael Gill; Ana Miranda; Robert D Oades; Herbert Roeyers; Aribert Rothenberger; Joseph Sergeant; Edmund Sonuga-Barke; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; Margaret Thompson; Rosemary Tannock; Philip Asherson; Stephen V Faraone
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.

Authors:  Steven P Reise
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Measurement differences in depression: chronic health-related and sociodemographic effects in older Americans.

Authors:  Frances M Yang; Richard N Jones
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  Disparities in self-reported geriatric depressive symptoms due to sociodemographic differences: an extension of the bi-factor item response theory model for use in differential item functioning.

Authors:  Frances M Yang; Doug Tommet; Richard N Jones
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  ADHD in DSM-5: a field trial in a large, representative sample of 18- to 19-year-old adults.

Authors:  B Matte; L Anselmi; G A Salum; C Kieling; H Gonçalves; A Menezes; E H Grevet; L A Rohde
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Bayesian Multilevel Trifactor Item Response Theory Model.

Authors:  Ken A Fujimoto
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 2.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.