Literature DB >> 29795928

An Unbiased Estimate of Global Interrater Agreement.

Denis Cousineau1, Louis Laurencelle2.   

Abstract

Assessing global interrater agreement is difficult as most published indices are affected by the presence of mixtures of agreements and disagreements. A previously proposed method was shown to be specifically sensitive to global agreement, excluding mixtures, but also negatively biased. Here, we propose two alternatives in an attempt to find what makes such methods so specific. The first method, RB , is found to be unbiased while at the same time rejecting mixtures, is detecting agreement with good power and is little affected by unequal category prevalence as soon as there are more than two categories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  category prevalence; interrater agreement; statistical test

Year:  2016        PMID: 29795928      PMCID: PMC5965630          DOI: 10.1177/0013164416654740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  2 in total

1.  High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Interrater agreement statistics with skewed data: evaluation of alternatives to Cohen's kappa.

Authors:  Shu Xu; Michael F Lorber
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-08-04
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Interrater reliability estimators tested against true interrater reliabilities.

Authors:  Xinshu Zhao; Guangchao Charles Feng; Song Harris Ao; Piper Liping Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.612

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.