Literature DB >> 29795916

Adjacent-Categories Mokken Models for Rater-Mediated Assessments.

Stefanie A Wind1.   

Abstract

Molenaar extended Mokken's original probabilistic-nonparametric scaling models for use with polytomous data. These polytomous extensions of Mokken's original scaling procedure have facilitated the use of Mokken scale analysis as an approach to exploring fundamental measurement properties across a variety of domains in which polytomous ratings are used, including rater-mediated educational assessments. Because their underlying item step response functions (i.e., category response functions) are defined using cumulative probabilities, polytomous Mokken models can be classified as cumulative models based on the classifications of polytomous item response theory models proposed by several scholars. In order to permit a closer conceptual alignment with educational performance assessments, this study presents an adjacent-categories variation on the polytomous monotone homogeneity and double monotonicity models. Data from a large-scale rater-mediated writing assessment are used to illustrate the adjacent-categories approach, and results are compared with the original formulations. Major findings suggest that the adjacent-categories models provide additional diagnostic information related to individual raters' use of rating scale categories that is not observed under the original formulation. Implications are discussed in terms of methods for evaluating rating quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mokken scaling; polytomous item response theory models; rating quality

Year:  2016        PMID: 29795916      PMCID: PMC5965541          DOI: 10.1177/0013164416643826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  4 in total

1.  Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.

Authors:  Ismail S Gyagenda; George Engelhard
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2009

2.  Constructing rater and task banks for performance assessments.

Authors:  G Engelhard
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1997

3.  Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; George Engelhard
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2012

4.  Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.

Authors:  Stephanie A Wind
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2014
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.