Literature DB >> 29795822

Development and Monte Carlo Study of a Procedure for Correcting the Standardized Mean Difference for Measurement Error in the Independent Variable.

William Robert Nugent1, Matthew Moore1, Erin Story1.   

Abstract

The standardized mean difference (SMD) is perhaps the most important meta-analytic effect size. It is typically used to represent the difference between treatment and control population means in treatment efficacy research. It is also used to represent differences between populations with different characteristics, such as persons who are depressed and those who are not. Measurement error in the independent variable (IV) attenuates SMDs. In this article, we derive a formula for the SMD that explicitly represents accuracy of classification of persons into populations on the basis of scores on an IV. We suggest an alternate version of the SMD less vulnerable to measurement error in the IV. We derive a novel approach to correcting the SMD for measurement error in the IV and show how this method can also be used to reliability correct the unstandardized mean difference. We compare this reliability correction approach with one suggested by Hunter and Schmidt in a series of Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, we consider how the proposed reliability correction method can be used in meta-analysis and suggest future directions for both research and further theoretical development of the proposed reliability correction method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  correcting for measurement error; meta-analysis; reliability correction; standardized mean difference

Year:  2014        PMID: 29795822      PMCID: PMC5965591          DOI: 10.1177/0013164414534067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  7 in total

1.  The meta-analysis of partial effect sizes.

Authors:  Stephen P Keef; Leigh A Roberts
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Major depressive disorder is associated with broad impairments on neuropsychological measures of executive function: a meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Assessment of depressive affect in clinical practice.

Authors:  W W Hudson; E K Proctor
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1977-12

4.  Effects of deficient reporting on meta-analysis: a conceptual framework and reanalysis.

Authors:  R G Orwin; D S Cordray
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment. Confirmation from meta-analysis.

Authors:  M W Lipsey; D B Wilson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1993-12

7.  Spirituality, contentment, and stress in recovering alcoholics.

Authors:  E Don Poage; Kay E Ketzenberger; James Olson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.913

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.