Literature DB >> 29795818

Real and Artificial Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items.

David Andrich1, Curt Hagquist2.   

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) for an item between two groups is present if, for the same person location on a variable, persons from different groups have different expected values for their responses. Applying only to dichotomously scored items in the popular Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method for detecting DIF in which persons are classified by their total scores on an instrument, Andrich and Hagquist articulated the concept of artificial DIF and showed that as an artifact of the MH method, real DIF in one item favoring one group inevitably induces artificial DIF favoring the other group in all other items. Using the dichotomous Rasch model in which the total score for a person is a sufficient statistic, and therefore justifies classifying persons by their total scores, Andrich and Hagquist showed that to distinguish between real and artificial DIF in an item identified by the MH method, a sequential procedure for resolving items is implied. Using the polytomous Rasch model, this article generalizes the concept of artificial DIF to polytomous items, in which multiple item parameters play a role. The article shows that the same principle of resolving items sequentially as with dichotomous items applies also to distinguishing between real and artificial DIF with polytomous items. A real example and a small simulated example that parallels the real example are used illustratively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial DIF; differential item functioning; partial credit; polytomous Rasch model; rating scales

Year:  2014        PMID: 29795818      PMCID: PMC5965593          DOI: 10.1177/0013164414534258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  6 in total

1.  Modeling effects of differential item functioning in polytomous items.

Authors:  W C Wang
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2000

2.  Conditional pairwise estimation in the Rasch model for ordered response categories using principal components.

Authors:  David Andrich; Guanzhong Luo
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2003

3.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.

Authors:  N MANTEL; W HAENSZEL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The efficacy of link items in the construction of a numeracy achievement scale--from kindergarten to year 6.

Authors:  Juho Looveer; Joanne Mulligan
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2009

5.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

6.  A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics.

Authors:  G Karabatsos
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2000
  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  Testing for Differential Item Functioning Under the D-Scoring Method.

Authors:  Dimiter M Dimitrov; Dimitar V Atanasov
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Using Mokken scaling techniques to explore carelessness in survey research.

Authors:  Stefanie Wind; Yurou Wang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-21

3.  Semi-automated Rasch analysis with differential item functioning.

Authors:  Feri Wijayanto; Ioan Gabriel Bucur; Karlien Mul; Perry Groot; Baziel G M van Engelen; Tom Heskes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Rasch analysis suggests that health assessment questionnaire II is a generic measure of physical functioning for rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  William J Taylor; Ketna Parekh
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  The Psychometric Properties of the Swedish Version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Based on Adolescent Data.

Authors:  Victoria Lönnfjord; Curt Hagquist
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2017-01-11

6.  Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in composite health measurement scale: Recommendations for characterizing DIF with meaningful consequences within the Rasch model framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Rouquette; Jean-Benoit Hardouin; Alexis Vanhaesebrouck; Véronique Sébille; Joël Coste
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cross-country comparisons of trends in adolescent psychosomatic symptoms - a Rasch analysis of HBSC data from four Nordic countries.

Authors:  Curt Hagquist; Pernille Due; Torbjørn Torsheim; Raili Välimaa
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Explaining differential item functioning focusing on the crucial role of external information - an example from the measurement of adolescent mental health.

Authors:  Curt Hagquist
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Construct validity of a global scale for Workplace Social Capital based on COPSOQ III.

Authors:  Hanne Berthelsen; Hugo Westerlund; Jan Hyld Pejtersen; Emina Hadzibajramovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development and validation of a new instrument to measure perceived risks associated with the use of tobacco and nicotine-containing products.

Authors:  Stefan Cano; Christelle Chrea; Thomas Salzberger; Thomas Alfieri; Gerard Emilien; Nelly Mainy; Antonio Ramazzotti; Frank Lüdicke; Rolf Weitkunat
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.